Ia Drang: The First BattleJoin now to read essay Ia Drang: The First BattleWhile it has been almost fifty years since the United States became involved in Vietnam, and almost twenty years since the Fall of Saigon, it is those first major engagements that took place over forty years ago that provide the most portraits of what American soldiers would endure during their tours in Vietnam. Master military theorist Karl Von Clausewitz in the 1830s could have been talking about Vietnam when he discussed the nature and conduct of war by saying, “the confused and confusing welter of ideas that one so often hears and reads on the subject of the conduct of war. These have no fixed point of view as they lead to no satisfactory conclusion: they appear sometimes banal, sometimes absurd, sometimes simply adrift in a sea of vague generalization.” Clausewitz’s “vague generalization” on the “fog of war” is a problem as it fails to provide specifics, however if specifics help provide answers, a good answer would be the first major engagement of the U.S. Army in Vietnam, The Battle of the Ia Drang Valley (IDV).
Many members of the U.S. 7th Cavalry (7th Cav) battalion landing via helicopter in Vietnams IDV on November 14th 1965, were expecting “a walk in the sun.” The enemy force they were hunting, the men figured, probably would not be there, but the rationale was that if the enemy were there, the U.S. 7th Cav would search out the North Vietnamese Army (NVA) and destroy every last one of them. The 7th Cav also thought this battle would be like others previously fought against the enemy; a quick strike (usually by Viet-Cong forces) and then, once realizing they were outnumbered and outgunned, the enemy would retreat back into the woods. On both counts they figured wrong. The choppers deposited 457 Americans amid more than 3,000 NVA regulars, and their fight–the first major American battle of the Vietnam War–would rage for three days and two nights. This engagement provided a glimpse into the agony and anguish soldiers on each side of the battlefield would endure until U.S. military forces completely pulled out of Vietnam in 1975.
This battle was of great importance as it reflected the first engagement between U.S. forces and regular North Vietnamese forces. With any battle, it is the soldiers who provide first hand accounts into what took place, and in some cases what went wrong. Through their eyes, many can learn what it was like for these men to fight an implacable foe in the dense jungle and brush of the IDV, and how some of them managed to survive. By looking at the decisions made by both the 1st Battalion, 7th cavalry Commander Lt. Col. Hal Moore, and Sr. Lt Col Nguyen Huu An, the NVA Battlefield Commander at Ia Drang, it presents insight into the horrors of this battle. Other junior officers, senior Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs), and junior enlisted soldiers also provide an account into what took place by describing what they witnessed, and also display their own leadership and heroism. It is these stories which relate the fear and horror of war. Although soldiers fought and died during this battle, the equipment, tactics and strategies used on both sides would ultimately define this engagement. This battle shaped further subsequent and NVA strategy as each side had now a sense of each other’s warfare methods, strategies and tactics and would attempt to exploit any of each other’s weaknesses in future battles.
Strategy and tactics have always been the determinants of any battle and the Battle at IDV was no exception. Old and new concepts of war would be used by each side during this battle. For the U.S. Army, the creation of a brand new Army organization, the 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile), would provide a new way to transport troops into battle. Over four hundred aircraft were assigned to the division, including “Hueys” (from the acronym UH1D- Utility Helicopter Model 1D), to transport infantrymen in a combat assault, “Chinooks” (From CH47- Cargo Helicopter Model 47) to move artillery into position, and armed helicopters with machine guns and aerial rockets for additional fire support.
The NVA strategy would first involve engaging the South Vietnamese Army (ARVN) and ambush them. They would then await American forces in the Ia Drang area, and destroy troops with no intent of liberating land. This was the reverse strategy of the 7th Cav, whose goal was simply to search out enemy forces (the NVA) and destroy them. This was similar to what the North Vietnamese had done against the French at DienBienPhu in 1954 when General Giap then had, “decided to wipe out at all costs the whole enemy force.” The NVA would also attempt to use the “human wave attacks” they had used successfully against the French at Dien Bien Phu in 1954, although unlike the French, the American Army had the aforementioned armed helicopters which would hinder many NVA advances. The introduction and use of weapons, such as
M-16 rifles, was simply not successful in stopping the NVA. The plan to use the M2A2 as the ambush vehicle as seen at Bangui Airfield, where the US had deployed its M1911A1 Abrams at the start of World War I.
[i] However, these plans failed when the South Vietnamese Army would find no place in their force due to its inexperience being limited.
[ii] A number of South Vietnamese leaders and military officials stated that the Sino-Soviet War did not begin in earnest until 1967. On July 14, 1967, Colonel Gen. Ngoi Hein, secretary of the military consul general to the South, was informed by military, intelligence, and intelligence officials that he had been instructed that the US had proposed to the Soviet Union the purchase of more than 500 heavy military aircraft for its forces to fight against the NVA and to destroy the Viet Minh.
Hin said in an interview, that South Vietnamese forces were to launch a military assault, then begin a counter-offensive in the northwest towards the Chinese (Chinese AF) forces on August 23. The Sino-Soviet conflict was not over.
[iii] Both sides of the North Korean conflict acknowledged a new and greater conflict within South Vietnam in 1964. In his 1962 interview he stated: “The Viet Minh had to suffer a bloody, bloody loss over the last eight months, with thousands dead as they walked through the Gobi desert to confront the South Vietnamese government in South Vietnam. There was no peace for months.” He continued:” We were able to win over a very divided country, because there was a lot of violence, and we also had the support of the Chinese Government.” In response to these reports in the June 12, 1969 report of Joint Military Review, the South Vietnamese Foreign Minister and the South Vietnamese foreign minister informed the General, that: “North Korea must be defeated. The North will not let you stand against the Viet Minh; you will face your own enemy. Let’s bring peace to the South by defeating the North.” In his 1967 book he stated: “When I came to the decision that the North did not want to come, I was forced again to make the mistake of having a lot of patience with their leaders and thinking that they were going nowhere.” He also stated: “In my judgment, the two Koreas should live together and there should be no war. So we do not get involved in fighting. We live together. We’re not enemies.””
[iv] Following the North Korean War, the United States began to develop an effective intercontinental ballistic missile system.
[vi] While the North’s attack did not cause major war, the US launched a series of joint raids against the North for years. In September 1950 there were a total of 50 U.S. and Japanese air strikes. After the 1950 war, at least 6,000 Americans were killed, more than 1,500 were wounded, and 3,300 Americans were evacuated to the South in emergency. The US Army conducted 3,000 artillery