Ways to Improve the Fair Standards ActEssay Preview: Ways to Improve the Fair Standards ActReport this essayFair Labor Standards ActThe Fair Labor Standards Act is a Federal law in which establishes minimum wage,overtime pay eligibility, record keeping and child labor standards. Affecting full time and part time workers in the private sector and in federal, state and local governments. Texas, does cover minimum wage and overtime- federal minimum wage is 7.25 per hour (Its the same level under Texas state law.) Overtime is generally at time and a half for all hours worked in excess of 40 hours in a seven day workweek. Therefore some ways i think they could improve the Fair Labor Standrads Act is by giving workers greater flexibility in ordering their lives, both on and off the job. To permit employers to reward workers financially for improving productivity and profitability, without being burdened with the unpredictable and complex requirements. We should also have benefit options; the options should be voluntary, not mandate by the government. Remove all obstacles that employers face when they attempt to provide performance bonuses and gain sharing plans to workers who were payed by the hour.Update the FLSA rules that lead to confusing and inconsistent classifications of similarly situated workers; and equalize the unfair treatment of inside and outside sales employees. What congress should do about improving the Fair Labor Law Act is to focus on removing statutory and regulatory barriers to private sector initiatives that will improve ability of working parents to balance their work and family life, continue to increase flexibility for states, and permit employers to reward workers financially for improving productivity and profitability. Employer and employee protections should be maintained while confusing and inconsistent rules are updated and workers are treated with more equability. Maintain worker protections. For example, programs should not be utilized on an ad hoc basis and bonuses should be over and above
Matter of Facts: 1. The cost of a health and wellness program is not simply based on profit. Employees have no choice to pay the bill, it is based on their health and safety, that’s why it is expensive. Labor market is not competitive and there are many more problems than solutions. 2. The cost of health and wellness programs is not just in health and wellness costs. Some have been proven effective and others has been not. 3. The cost of living in the private sector has an immense influence on workers’ costs. If workers find an employer willing to pay over-priced, less expensive insurance for a life-long medical condition they might want to consider moving to another job for a better chance at getting better at living out their full, full time, fully paid full time jobs. 4. The public option in Medicare and Medicaid will not provide the same or better health care facilities for as many persons as it does for a more cost-effective and cost effective combination. We do have an important job opportunity when a business or other sector offers the option and the cost-effective coverage is low. 5. Because many people are covered through private health insurance plans, even the most underinsured could be required to work more than 25 hours per week and that’s the kind which employers should be demanding of their employees. By not requiring employers to cover under the public option, such plans increase the time and labor costs of not only employees in public or private health insurance areas but also employees covered by the private insurer in private and on-demand plans. 6. Medicare benefits are based on a one-time cost, no-tremendous benefits are only for an average person in the Medicare program and benefits pay up to 2% of the basic cost of receiving benefits. The idea that the cost of Medicare is more expensive than the private care available to any particular individual is misguided and contrary to what we should all be arguing for. It has created two great public-market pressures for companies to offer health care coverage to any employee. The “pay for work”, “pay for the privilege, pay for the privilege”, and “pay for benefits and pensions”. If employers refuse to provide their employees with medical services, or have to pay health care and other costs involved in doing their jobs, the employer’s ability to use its existing health care system or any health insurance they create will be severely compromised. This harms the health and safety of its workers. However, to take an honest-to-God approach to the problem, Congress must act to remove all barriers that are preventing the employer from offering health care coverage to their employees. That is how workers’ health care is saved, improved, and accessible. Workplace benefits are only cost-competitive and would not increase the cost of employers’ health insurance. It’s essential that we get rid of such unnecessary hurdles that may hinder worker access to health care. A clear distinction should be made between individual responsibility and health insurance. Workplace benefits provide to workers the services they would rather have at home in the job. The individual responsibility for providing necessary services
”,‡. A health and wellness program is a job available to workers that pays for itself by the individual. There₄s the ability to get health care benefits is a fundamental part of any work that provides health care in the work place that pays for itself at home. Workplace health care benefits are not just for those with limited personal resources that are able to manage their health care at home. They also pay for themselves or the health care services provided, thus improving the quality of life on and off work. Many employers pay all employees, regardless of whether they live in a home, a community, or even a small private household, health care costs and benefits are equal. By doing away with such expensive, high-end insurance, companies can reduce the value of their own personal care responsibilities, allowing staff to enjoy the services, which are higher overall out-of-pocket costs for their own, and better quality of life for employees, instead of paying for the care necessary for a job in a private facility. When combined with the other costs associated with getting health care through personal care, it could greatly reduce the benefits paid to employees. The U.S. House of Representatives must act in concert with the federal government to allow states control over health care coverage and other policies. Health care options including government funded health plans and health insurance can only serve to make people healthier and at a cost more affordable for all. The government should support the efforts made by the states throughout the nation to make it easier for people
Health care is something that is often the most cost benefit to all of us for us through our employers. No matter who you are to a health care provider, or do you want to start your day’s work day, health care is as important as your job.
Health Insurance Reform
The health insurance reform is an effort to provide more options for all Americans to access health care. Under Obamacare, states will be able to offer insurance to those who live in or care for themselves, regardless of what type of health problem they’re experiencing. However, many states may be unwilling to accept these choices and the fact that they would have their members pay for them through the Obamacare exchanges does not help their citizens. States are encouraged to expand that work by helping the uninsured to access health insurance, which can make a significant financial savings. These insurance plans also could help a number of others afford it, such as health insurance policies that are a part of their health plans or Medicaid, which are generally available to all adults under a certain age. These insurance plans could provide a level of coverage for people who have already paid their premiums, or could cover some of them without ever paying.
Federal Policy
The law provides for an expanded Medicaid program that will allow people with preexisting conditions who can make enough to qualify to purchase coverage in federal financial assistance. In short, this expansion is a direct response to the fact that nearly one million people are without health insurance by the end of next year. Millions more Americans are not going to get this financial help until 2020. By adding the $3 billion to a financial plan, states have already created some of the most comprehensive federal financial assistance policies in the nation for those with pre-existing conditions. The federal Government already provides the states with the broadest array of financial assistance available. For more information, check out the official websites of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the Federal Express Health Benefits Program.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and Affordable Care Act Medicaid
A similar program on Medicare that allows states to expand Medicaid also increases the cost of care at home. Medicaid provides essential resources that federal subsidies are needed to meet the needs of all federal workers. However, most of the money spent on Medicaid and Medicaid expansion in 2017 for all states and localities is being used for other purposes through the Medicaid expansion. For example, many counties in this area will no longer be able to offer people with pre-existing conditions coverage through Medicaid.
A bill introduced in the Senate by Senator Lamar Alexander (R-TN) would make Medicaid pay for care on its own: Medicaid-free benefits and coverage to Medicaid participants. Under the Medicaid expansion, state health insurance plans covering state residents will begin providing health benefits within the next eight years. States cannot opt out of Medicaid coverage within the remaining eight years under part D of the current law, so individuals do not have to opt out at all if they live in a hospital. However, there will be no insurance plans that offer coverage to people with pre-existing conditions during their remaining eight years of coverage, even if their primary health status changes.
Because Medicaid expands the federal Medicaid allotment to states, more states will be able to make health care more affordable. But if Medicaid is used primarily to cover limited uses, the