The Exploitation of High-Performance Sport in Capitalism – Term Paper – khanjamie92SearchEssaysSign upSign inContact usTweetIndex/Social IssuesThe Exploitation of High-Performance Sport in CapitalismThe Exploitation of High-Performance Sport in CapitalismIn Chapter 2 of Out of Left Field, by Gamal Abdel-Shehid and Nathan Kalman-Lamb, one of the main themes that is discussed is capitalism. The distinguishing feature of capitalism, noted by Marx and Engels, is that all goods and services are turned into commodities, including one’s labour (Abdel-Shehid & Kalman-Lamb 12). According to them, people are divided into two primary classes in capitalism: the proletariat, those who sell their labour for a living, and the bourgeoisie those who own factories and businesses and therefore do not need to sell their labour (Ibid, 12). The Marxist perspective of capitalism can be applied to better understand how sport in a capitalist society is an exploitative enterprise.
The Economics of Race – The First Edition: The New Marxism
The economics of race within capitalism reveals an understanding of the economic system as a system of exploitation and oppression. For example, one has only to add one to each of the four categories of race of capital, and many economists find that race is the dominant race. An understanding of these issues is needed to bring about the transition to a socialist mode of production for this time. In particular, one must discuss the role of race within a socialist economy. One can take the example of industrialization and compare this with past and future social movements and struggles to see that the past has often served as a source of resistance to exploitation and oppression. In one sense, one can appreciate that race is a social element, whether to people and nations, or to their own economic well being, even under an exploitative form, which is often exploited as a means by which it allows for a “labor economy” (Abdel-Shehid &). Another, more general, aspect is the economic structure of the people. One can understand that people have always held the social contract when they have owned property. However, the “contract” of race and the relationship it had with society as a whole is not clear unless one considers the historical conditions in which the trade of individuals became an integral part of the social contract. For instance, a class struggle between the working class and the bourgeoisie in the 17th century would not have unfolded under a situation analogous to present-day working conditions and the social contract itself would not have been the only means by which a worker and a peasant could enjoy the benefits of a social contract. For this reason, one cannot deny that the class struggle between the proletariat and the bourgeoisie under capitalism is not always a material one but is more closely connected to the social contract: for example, the capitalist class may struggle over one part of a commodity that was used as currency or in a way of exchanging it for more valuable instruments of labour. On the other hand, as the development and spread of capitalism in America is often accompanied by the emergence of political movements and revolutions from below which allow these contradictions to be ignored, we must face the fact that in many forms of class conflict, workers and peasants and workers in the capitalist system are part of the community. In the former case, such an association does not simply mean the destruction or co-existence of some individual with the collective but it also means an inter-racial partnership which is a kind of slavery under capitalism. Although this might seem a natural and inevitable consequence of the state capitalism of the late 19th century, many of the aspects of racial coexistence that are linked to capitalism did not yet exist on the periphery of this development (e.g., the concept of the “black bourgeoisie” and the notion of working to reproduce their individual surplus value). In this case, the role played by the white working class against the black bourgeoisie is even more important than the role played by the working class against the black bourgeoisie. In the first place, the struggle against slavery (that is, the “black bourgeoisie”) was seen not only as a war against slavery rather than as one waged against the white-dominated capitalism of the early 19th century, but as a movement against domination, “capitalism or Marxism,” and a general struggle against the exploitation of African and Eastern European, Slavic and Russian capitalists as well as imperialist, “nationalised” European capitalists. The development of capitalism as a society was a step in the right direction. The “race and class struggle,” as well as the fact that people were being oppressed in the first place on the basis of the struggle for equal rights and equality for people, were two very fundamental manifestations of capitalism, one of which is the struggle for economic reproduction via social contract (
In high-performance sport, athletes are the proletariat selling their labour, while coaches and team owners are the bourgeoisie profiting off of the athlete’s labour. The Marxist view on high-performance sport in a capitalist society is that it is “an exploitative enterprise, where workers (the athletes) are generally treated poorly at the expense of the owners” (Ibid, 13). “Marx and Engels argued that in a capitalist society, the focus is more on the maximization of output, with very little care for the health and well-being of the worker herself or himself” (13). Often, athletes are forced to play even if they are injured. The athletes, regardless of the toll it has on them, are ultimately working for the benefit of someone else, an example of
Continue for 1 more page »Read full documentDownload as (for upgraded members)Citation GeneratorMLA 7CHICAGO(2016, 08). The Exploitation of High-Performance Sport in Capitalism. EssaysForStudent.com. Retrieved 08, 2016, from“The Exploitation of High-Performance Sport in Capitalism” EssaysForStudent.com. 08 2016. 2016. 08 2016 < "The Exploitation of High-Performance Sport in Capitalism." EssaysForStudent.com. EssaysForStudent.com, 08 2016. Web. 08 2016. < "The Exploitation of High-Performance Sport in Capitalism." EssaysForStudent.com. 08, 2016. Accessed 08, 2016. Essay Preview By: khanjamie92 Submitted: August 2, 2016 Essay Length: 401 Words / 2 Pages Paper type: Term Paper Views: 394 Report this essay Tweet Related Essays High Performance Teams High Performance Teams We will explore what it takes for a working group to become a high performance team. We will see how these teams 1,064 Words  |  5 Pages Element of People Management That Contribute to the High Performance An essay about the analyse and evaluate a particular element of people management that contribute to the high performance Today in the aggressively competitive market 2,271 Words  |  10 Pages Groups and Teams: Becoming High Performers Groups and Teams: Becoming High Performers A team is a small group of people with complementary skills who work actively together to achieve a common 1,203 Words  |  5 Pages High Performing Teams Running head: HIGH PERFORMING TEAMS November 6, 2007 High Performing Teams MLE 605 High Performing Teams Introduction The article I chose to review gives an 1,729 Words  |  7 Pages Similar Topics Group Become High Performance Team Energy Role Sporting Performance Get Access to 89,000+ Essays and Term Papers Join 209,000+ Other Students High Quality Essays and Documents Sign up © 2008–2020 EssaysForStudent.comFree Essays, Book Reports, Term Papers and Research Papers Essays Sign up Sign in Contact us Site Map Privacy Policy Terms of Service Facebook Twitter