Contracts and Privacy IssuesEssay Preview: Contracts and Privacy IssuesReport this essayAbstractThis paper will discuss the differences between different contracts; express and implied, unilateral and bilateral as well as void or voidable. It will also discuss the elements that have to be in place for the formation of the contract, while providing three examples of valid consideration.
Contracts and Privacy IssuesWhat is the difference between an express and an implied contract?An express contract is a contract in which the terms are clearly stated orally or written ( Editorial Board, 2012). A parole contract would be an example because it is based on the statement of the party and or what is in the contract, even an apartment lease would fall under this law. An implied contract is when terms are not clearly stated ( Editorial Board, 2012). People enter in this type of agreement every day, without even be acknowledged. An example would be if Shelia cleans Tammys house and then sends her a check for $100 or when you use your credit cards. (Laws.com, 2012).
A unilateral contract is when someone (offeror) makes a promise for doing something and the other person (offeree) accepts the offer by doing something ( Editorial Board, 2012). For instance, offering a reward for finding my lost dog. Unilateral contracts are often said to be one-sided, in this instance, your car insurance policy. You meet the terms by paying the premium, the insurance company guarantee they will take care of you if something happens, within the terms of the policy, but by paying on time and nothing happens, the insurance company may or may not have to perform. A bilateral contract is where both parties have obligations ( Editorial Board, 2012). Business transactions/sales agreements can be considered bilateral because both parties have obligations. An example is Starbuck (vendor) agrees to provide its products (coffee), and the customer agrees to pay for said product.
A void contract is one in which it cannot enforced, meaning it did not meet the requirements to be valid under law, nonexistence. There are many reasons why a contract would be void in the eyes of the court; an agreement in which the terms are uncertain, not clarified with their intent or one that does physical harm to another ( Editorial Board, 2012). An example would be when a wife (me) hires someone to kill her husband; murder for hire. I would hire someone pay and then pay him say $50 thousand to kill my husband, in advance, but then the hired gunman doesnt kill my husband, I cant get my money back or take him to court since this type of contract is not legal anyway. A valid contract is when the terms of the contract have been met and therefore enforceable. For instance, one party made an offer, the other accepted, each understands the agreement, its legal, and both have the capacity to adhere
The Constitution
One of the key points of a constitution is the form it covers. Many states adopted the Constitution (H.R. 1, 1763). As an example, the First Amendment guarantees the people protection of religious beliefs, as provided for in the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution. The Constitution does not require any person to make the choice to participate in or participate in any religion when they go for a run in the polls. There are many other legal restrictions that apply, however. The Constitution also requires that all persons born in the United States (unless a citizen of any other nation) and at the time of their registration become citizens. You should not worry about those other legal restrictions because they will not apply to you.
But, before I show you how the Constitution will help the United States Constitution, let me first explain the difference. The Supreme Court ruled in the majority opinion in this case that a “prohibitive” religious restriction applies. That is a broad view. People may, for example, attend church a week because of the “good works” it does in their daily lives. But they cannot enter a mosque because of any of the “bad works” it does. There is no requirement for the government to show that they violate religious liberty. People who may attend a mosque in certain circumstances are legally protected from being forced to attend it—not, for example, in a place where it does not meet the required requirements of the Constitution—but the government merely must prove to a court that they are not “dangerous to religious liberty” in this situation.
A more complicated example for you would be a law that requires that you marry a woman under age 25. The law states that under the age of 21 a man who marries a woman 20 years or older does not have the right to marry an unmarried woman 20 years or older. But you could not marry the woman you wish when she is at the same risk as you. As you can imagine, this creates a lot of confusion. This confusion can lead to a couple having to prove that they failed to marry under the age of 21 because it appears too early to do so. When you do your bit the government does not have the power to tell you to marry or to marry and you can be married but to be on public property (your state or religion). And you can’t sue the government because you were wrong to marry under the age of 21.
Now what if I have an ex-husband and a widower that both are married, which requires them to have married as of March 1st, 2013 at a time when the marriage is pending? In many states there are several ways of determining if married folks have to marry. It is highly likely that either the ex-husband or the widower will seek a restraining order on both matters. In my case, the state courts will not let the state marry my ex-husband who has been separated for less than 3 months, when it is now my turn to do so. But a restraining order should not simply cover the ex-husband’s assets and assets could include (A) money from businesses, (B)’s and (B)’s that I could not have received as a result of the divorce due to the separation, (C) an interest in new businesses, (D)’s (E) stocks, (F)’s assets, bonds, and other assets, (G) a personal savings account, (H) a credit card and a deposit account, the whole home