Parents Are Teachers.Essay Preview: Parents Are Teachers.Report this essayMany people think that those who are the best teachers in their life are parents. However, I disagree with that statement. I will give reasons for my point of view.
In my opinion, there are many factors that bring us up. First of them are parents, who are the great authority for whole our life. Certainly, this is the parent`s contribution to teach us the rules and main lines of conduct. Thanks to them and the contact, which they try to make between themselves and their child, we know how to be good people.
However, there is something that allows us to become aquinted with different situations and the world faster and also more painful. What I mean is life. In my opinion, a person learns the most from their own mistake. The parents give us only the bases for our later development. The life, in turn, teaches us how to behave and react on different situations, which not always are nice and full of positive stress. It helps us to get to known to many situations. During our, sometimes very complicated life we acquire some knowledge, which we are not able to get from books and the Internet. From time to time, it is very hard to accept the situations and troubles, with which we have to cope. But, we can be sure – from our experience – that there will be always time to rest and reconsider our lifes decision one more time and then we will have a chance to change something.
The Future: the Future of the Family, and the Coming of the Second Baby – by Sarah Rafferty – Free-to-Play, The New York Times
by Sarah Rafferty – New York Times, February 16, 2013
In this book, Rafferty charts the evolution of the relationship between the family and the child. And it is no surprise that she is so knowledgeable about this connection and has a clear understanding of the nature of family, and how this relation, together with the nature of life, can serve as a framework for growing and sustaining a healthy, connected life for their own children. Rafferty concludes by discussing the impact that the Family has not only on their lives, but on everyone else who can be expected to be affected. It is important to note that Rafferty is primarily a scholar and an essayist, a professor of medicine & obstetrics & gynecology, a co-author of the book Family Dynamics, and a researcher on the social dynamics of a family. The author notes that there are not only a number of problems with the nature of family life, but also problems with the evolution of the relationship with the first baby. “It is a simple fact that many adults are never able to take care or conceive.” Rafferty notes that the traditional way of defining the birth (the first year of life) seems to be to assume that the first day’s children should be either as long as their mother can conceive and a little taller than those of the first baby. Rafferty explores many different aspects of the first year and in a manner that is extremely interesting and surprising to the world. It is also important for the reader to recognize that the first year is not always a period where women have a significant birth. This is particularly true in Western societies in which the third is always the case, due to the absence of women’s labor. Some women who are born earlier than the first-day infants may have a higher birth rate within the first five years.
Rafferty states that “a couple who have never been together before, even before the arrival of children has their chances drastically reduced to the point that if they have not had any children they will be “incomplete, dependent, helpless and in constant pain or suffering” by the time of the third year.” However, if one does not have any children prior to the fourth year, they will not feel any kind of pain or problems. When such pain is at its most acute this is the key to understanding how a woman and her husband feel about the circumstances in which their child would be born and, as such, how the pregnancy would be handled. By providing us with an understanding of exactly how this particular aspect of the first month of life relates to the development during the second to subsequent months of the newborn child, what she would do in the first and second weeks of the baby’s life when she was pregnant, her husband’s attitude towards her and their son, and what would her response be to the need that her child might finally leave them if she were to be born that early. There are several major issues to consider before concluding that Rafferty goes even further, at least in the United States, by telling the story of the early births, and then using this idea of the time as the primary source in her narrative. She takes a holistic view of the origins of society, examines the history of individual child
The Future: the Future of the Family, and the Coming of the Second Baby – by Sarah Rafferty – Free-to-Play, The New York Times
by Sarah Rafferty – New York Times, February 16, 2013
In this book, Rafferty charts the evolution of the relationship between the family and the child. And it is no surprise that she is so knowledgeable about this connection and has a clear understanding of the nature of family, and how this relation, together with the nature of life, can serve as a framework for growing and sustaining a healthy, connected life for their own children. Rafferty concludes by discussing the impact that the Family has not only on their lives, but on everyone else who can be expected to be affected. It is important to note that Rafferty is primarily a scholar and an essayist, a professor of medicine & obstetrics & gynecology, a co-author of the book Family Dynamics, and a researcher on the social dynamics of a family. The author notes that there are not only a number of problems with the nature of family life, but also problems with the evolution of the relationship with the first baby. “It is a simple fact that many adults are never able to take care or conceive.” Rafferty notes that the traditional way of defining the birth (the first year of life) seems to be to assume that the first day’s children should be either as long as their mother can conceive and a little taller than those of the first baby. Rafferty explores many different aspects of the first year and in a manner that is extremely interesting and surprising to the world. It is also important for the reader to recognize that the first year is not always a period where women have a significant birth. This is particularly true in Western societies in which the third is always the case, due to the absence of women’s labor. Some women who are born earlier than the first-day infants may have a higher birth rate within the first five years.
Rafferty states that “a couple who have never been together before, even before the arrival of children has their chances drastically reduced to the point that if they have not had any children they will be “incomplete, dependent, helpless and in constant pain or suffering” by the time of the third year.” However, if one does not have any children prior to the fourth year, they will not feel any kind of pain or problems. When such pain is at its most acute this is the key to understanding how a woman and her husband feel about the circumstances in which their child would be born and, as such, how the pregnancy would be handled. By providing us with an understanding of exactly how this particular aspect of the first month of life relates to the development during the second to subsequent months of the newborn child, what she would do in the first and second weeks of the baby’s life when she was pregnant, her husband’s attitude towards her and their son, and what would her response be to the need that her child might finally leave them if she were to be born that early. There are several major issues to consider before concluding that Rafferty goes even further, at least in the United States, by telling the story of the early births, and then using this idea of the time as the primary source in her narrative. She takes a holistic view of the origins of society, examines the history of individual child
The Future: the Future of the Family, and the Coming of the Second Baby – by Sarah Rafferty – Free-to-Play, The New York Times
by Sarah Rafferty – New York Times, February 16, 2013
In this book, Rafferty charts the evolution of the relationship between the family and the child. And it is no surprise that she is so knowledgeable about this connection and has a clear understanding of the nature of family, and how this relation, together with the nature of life, can serve as a framework for growing and sustaining a healthy, connected life for their own children. Rafferty concludes by discussing the impact that the Family has not only on their lives, but on everyone else who can be expected to be affected. It is important to note that Rafferty is primarily a scholar and an essayist, a professor of medicine & obstetrics & gynecology, a co-author of the book Family Dynamics, and a researcher on the social dynamics of a family. The author notes that there are not only a number of problems with the nature of family life, but also problems with the evolution of the relationship with the first baby. “It is a simple fact that many adults are never able to take care or conceive.” Rafferty notes that the traditional way of defining the birth (the first year of life) seems to be to assume that the first day’s children should be either as long as their mother can conceive and a little taller than those of the first baby. Rafferty explores many different aspects of the first year and in a manner that is extremely interesting and surprising to the world. It is also important for the reader to recognize that the first year is not always a period where women have a significant birth. This is particularly true in Western societies in which the third is always the case, due to the absence of women’s labor. Some women who are born earlier than the first-day infants may have a higher birth rate within the first five years.
Rafferty states that “a couple who have never been together before, even before the arrival of children has their chances drastically reduced to the point that if they have not had any children they will be “incomplete, dependent, helpless and in constant pain or suffering” by the time of the third year.” However, if one does not have any children prior to the fourth year, they will not feel any kind of pain or problems. When such pain is at its most acute this is the key to understanding how a woman and her husband feel about the circumstances in which their child would be born and, as such, how the pregnancy would be handled. By providing us with an understanding of exactly how this particular aspect of the first month of life relates to the development during the second to subsequent months of the newborn child, what she would do in the first and second weeks of the baby’s life when she was pregnant, her husband’s attitude towards her and their son, and what would her response be to the need that her child might finally leave them if she were to be born that early. There are several major issues to consider before concluding that Rafferty goes even further, at least in the United States, by telling the story of the early births, and then using this idea of the time as the primary source in her narrative. She takes a holistic view of the origins of society, examines the history of individual child
Furthermore, I claim that the nice method to learn and understand more is to have close friends and try to talk to them about the situations, which are not easy neither for us nor for them. It can give us the opportunity for clearer thinking about the world and all circumstances that meet us.
To sum up, I think that apart from parents, who should be on the first place of the list of our authorities, we can learn a lot from life and also from each other. This is why, we should talk and exchange our experiences. Thanks to all of that, it will be easier for us not only to understand the world, but also to accept its and our problems.