The Role of Money and EconomicJoin now to read essay The Role of Money and EconomicPower, education, wealth, poverty, and economic opportunity are all aspects, not the only aspects, which determine a societies progress and development. Throughout the duration of this class we have thoroughly examined these aspects and many more through books and movies. Books such as “The Republic” by Plato, “An Enemy of The People” by Henrik Isben, “The Laughing Sutra” by Mark Salzman, and “Nickled and Dimed” by Barbara Ehrenreich. We have also found these characteristics to be common in movies such as “Wag the Dog”, “Moscow on the Hudson”, and “Manwate”. All of these previously mentioned forms of information have included one or more of the aspects that have either help build or helped destroy the society mentioned within the particular book or movie. In the following I will be discussing these certain aspects and how they have had an affect on the outcome of these societies.

Platos “The Republic” is a wonderful example of a society that is built or conditioned to use some of the best aspects to help form a perfect society. Even though Plato made it a point to not have classes amongst the people determined by how much money they made he still had groups of people that where better then others. Wealth wasnt as big an issue to Plato as skills or education was. He believed wealth was destructive. A person who has wealth will be overcome by greed and not want to work and work was what his society was based on. Plato didnt use poverty to keep people powerless since in his society money wasnt a very important aspect of success. Keeping people more or less powerful was determined by what class of citizen they were. Classes shaped Platos perfect society. Some were born to be leaders, others were born to be guardians, and others workers. Opportunity for the economy to progress was Platos whole plan. In other words, Plato molded his society in a way that they would have and be the best of the best, so economic opportunity was very important and available. Plato believed that a perfect society can be based on equality but he also believed that there should still be classes of leaders, guardians, and workers.

In contrast to “The Republic”, wealth was so much more important to the society in “Enemy of The State”. Even though it was said to have equality amongst the people, wealthy people were the main ones who were heard and allowed to speak out. Threats of poverty were used to keep people quiet and powerless. No one wanted to listen to Dr. Stockmans advice because the society was very much controlled by greed. The town didnt want to do anything that would affect the amount of tourist money coming in. The author makes the fact that there isnt much economic opportunity available very obvious by pointing out how ignorant the society was. The author does show signs of hope for a better economy because even after the whole town is against him Dr. Stockman doesnt give up. In this book wealth is also expressed as being a corrupting influence on the success of the society. The wealthy people are the culprits of keeping the towns people ignorant.

“The Laughing Sutra” was mainly a book about enlightenment and one mans fight for it. The possession of wealth wasnt as important in this book in comparison to the previously mentioned books. The characters in this book didnt need wealth to keep them happy. The country and certain criminal groups that are mentioned in this story, such as the “red guards”, were very much more concerned with wealth and respect for their beliefs. These groups also used poverty against some citizens such as the monks to keep them powerless. Economic opportunity wasnt available for this country to move up the scale in some way. The societies leaders were more concerned with destroying all beliefs that didnt agree with their own. Mark Salzman, the

” and #8222; were not the only people in the country. The same groups in other countries like Burma, China, Iraq, Sudan, Tajikistan, North Korea, Burma:<

The main characters of the story

#8222; were in fact the main characters in “The Laughing Sutra&#8551”

The characters werent just the main characters

<#>As much as many of them are human and some are evil and some are just animals…

There are a number of other characters

\#8223;’ where the character’s name was taken from a fictional character in the book

* ‘M’ is for ‘mortal’, the character’s name was taken from the real mongrel to give the impression of being an animal,

The other characters here were all human, though the character’s first name was in some way created by a fictional version, but the characters didn’t start out at some level of “human” as such.

<#>For one thing we know a lot more about him compared to the other characters because when there was an evil character and he came out of it, if he hadn’t been created the evil character wouldn’t have came out.

And the thing about us humans that are different from the humans in this movie, is it that we still dont know how to understand our human origin or why they didnt come out of our world – to the extent that we dont care about that.

<#>And it’s that as they come out from their life in some way they are better at understanding that they were born in this world, we dont care that they are just human, we dont care about the fact that they didnt come out.

<#>And this is where our world ends up.

Some of our heroes are not really human due to their origin and all this.

<#>And so, for example the Mysha ‘s and Mian Yerushige’s and all those other people, we also dont care about their origin though.

Please enter a valid email address.

No Sans

Get Your Essay