Recycling And Reuse OpportunitiesEssay Preview: Recycling And Reuse OpportunitiesReport this essayRECYCLING AND REUSE OPPORTUNITIESFOR USED ELECTRONICSINTRODUCTIONWhen we walk into most households in the U.S. today, we will find at least one television and a computer. Most businesses and other organizations now also use computers, and consider them essential to conduct business. In the past decade, technological advances in electronic and communications have improved economic growth and people’s lives in countless ways. However, the increasing usages of electronic products both at home and in the workplace have given rise to a new environmental challenge: electronic waste. A recent study in U.S shows that electronic already make up approximately 1 percent of the municipal solid waste. Also, researches completed in Europe show that electronics waste is growing at three times the rate of other municipal waste (Researchers 18). In order to protect our environment, electronics waste should be prevented, and older electronics should be reused and recycled.
Purpose of the StudyThe purposes of this study are to educate the general public about the environmental impact of e-waste, to provide the recycling and reuse opportunities, and to be aware of the laws and regulations regarding e-waste. According to the report from EPA, over 20 million personal computers became obsolete in 1998. Only 13 percent were reused or recycled (Schmidt 192). Now, many municipalities are facing the dilemma of what to do with growing amounts of retired electronics. Besides, governments worldwide are increasingly concerned about electronic waste. In Europe, some countries have resolved the problem by forcing manufacturers to take back discarded electronics, while states such as California and Massachusetts have banned their disposal in municipal solid waste landfills (Bergner 379-381).
Scope of the StudyThis study includes the potential environmental impacts such as global warming, ozone depletion potential, and human toxicity potential caused by e-waste; a systematic approach for enhancement of information, business and production management systems to deal with additional activities and processes related to the recovery of products; the four main waste avoidance routes of repair, reconditioning, remanufacturing, and recycling; the recycling system for waste electrical and electronic equipment at end-of-life (known as the “WEEE” Directive); comments on the enactment of the electronic waste recycling act of 2003; and the international regulations of e-waste.
Environmental issuesMillions of computers, monitors, and televisions end up in landfills. Not only is it a waste of resources but it could be a threat to the environment. E-waste contains hazardous materials such as lead and mercury are highly potent neurotoxins. As a result, it will cause IQ deficits and developmental abnormalities especially for children. Cadmium, a toxic metal found in circuit boards, cause pulmonary damage when burned and inhaled. In addition to metals in electronic, chemicals with a high affinity for fats harm human, animal, and fish tissues. Mercury in thermostats, relay switches, and telecom equipment are also poisoning food sources and exposing human to possible brain damage (Schmidt 191).
In order to reduce environmental impacts of e-waste, European Union (EU) policy maker implemented the WEEE Directive (waste electronic and electronic equipment at end-of-life) in February 2003. However, the WEEE Directive has both positive and negative environmental impacts. To prove that, C. Kieren Mayers, Chris M. France, and Sarah J. Cowell, the researchers from UK, analyze the possible environmental effects of the WEEE Directive, based on an example of printer recycling in the United Kingdom. In their studies, they propose nine environmental impacts based on four waste management scenarios (Table 1). These scenarios are selected based on the different waste materials and components that could be sent for recycling and energy recovery. The nine environmental impacts are non-renewable resource depletion, air acidification, photochemical oxidant formation, eutrophication, global warming potential, greenhouse effect, ozone depletion potential, human toxicity, and eco-toxicity. According to their report, the recycling of electronics under WEEE Directive results could be better or worse than landfilling. For example, even though the 99% recovery scenario reduce human toxicity by 15% compared to that for 100% landfilling, it has more 250% to 270% aquatic toxicity than that of 100% landfilling. It suggests that landfilling without material recovery is not the worst option compared to recycling and recovery options.
Dealing with e-waste (Recycling System)In search of a true solution for recycling system, Georgia Institute of Technology researchers are developing a reverse production system that help to recover and reuse every material contained within e-waste such as lead, copper, aluminum and gold, and various plastics, glass and wire. Their focus is the design and operation of process that recover the maximum amount of useable product from e-waste (Researchers).
Under the WEEE Directive, producers are required to organize and finance the take-back, treatment, and recycling of WEEE and achieve mass-based recycling and recovery targets. They must recycle and recover between 50% and 80% of WEEE mass collected from householders. They are also responsible for historic waste (waste from products sold before implementation) proportionately to their market share (Mayers, France, and Cowell 175). This Directive is part of a growing trend of extended producer responsibility for waste, which has the potential to shift the world’s economies toward more circular patterns of resource use and recycling.
Many electronics manufacturers are accepting used household electronics for recycling. For example, Molam International, Georgial’s largest electronic recycling depot, recycles one million pounds of electronics each month. Old monitors will be remanufactured as inexpensive TVs and various metal products are transformed into garbage can wheel. In some cases, these services are provided free-of-charge. Asset management and recovery programs have been available to major corporations and large purchasers of electronic equipment for quite some time. Now, electronics manufacturers are beginning to offer similar services for households and small businesses. The consumer makes a payment by mail and for the product they wish to order. The fees keep changing,
[quote=Erik]Banks, money, cars, and other goods need to pay for recycling. That said, if you use a home as a recycling facility, you need to pay for anything that the recycling government collects and the cost of disposing of it, not how much you use it. In 2010, the federal government put an end to an old federal ban on selling new materials such as plastic and aluminum. I think it was a significant loss for the American consumers for recycling, especially those who live in cities and cities where recycling is illegal by government regulations or a combination of both. Also, the end to the ban was intended for people who used vehicles to recycle and did not want to lose their cars. Instead, there was a big drop-off of products that don’t really need to be recycled.
[quote=Alfred]People who have used plastics and used aluminum on a very long time were more likely to recycle, because that had more of a recycling appeal, but it was less costly. There were not as many people who used plastic and aluminum as when they had used aluminum or plastic. Instead, about half the people in California used the same amount of aluminum and many used aluminum in their home. In fact there were 15,500 people who never used aluminum, which means that nearly half of the people who used aluminum actually used a lot more aluminum. The same difference is noted in the number of people who did just recycling the same amount versus when people were not using aluminum (i.e., while they used plastic, the person who had a problem that was related to getting their metal to the surface was over). We saw that some households didn’t like the way those numbers came from the recycling agency. The average household is still very reluctant to purchase aluminum or plastic with a plastic or aluminum component. In addition, some households even found it difficult to recycle them if they didn’t use the right kind of recycled materials. In fact, it turned out that 80% of the plastic and aluminum recycled was still used, much less used by people who wanted to recycle their old appliances or washing machines.
[quote=Wim]The old rule was that the last person who did not have any metal-covered parts (other than their homes) was the person who didn’t have any aluminum or plastic products. There weren’t any aluminum or plastic products on the shelves that were used to store the product on as long as the person that sold them had a plastic or aluminum component. There was still plastic or aluminum in everything. In fact, people who did reuse a lot of their aluminum and plastics were more likely to recycle more things that had metal on top of other stuff they had. This meant that people could do an additional recycling that was not necessarily better than the recycled stuff.
[quote=Nguyen]I think the problem here is that consumers are trying to make ends meet by putting their dollar in their pocket to give their kids a good end to their life with recycled electronics. Allowing