What Makes an Effective Leader in Today’s World?Join now to read essay What Makes an Effective Leader in Today’s World?Todays world is fraught with a multitude of complications and problems ranging from terrorism, which is set to wipe out scores of people, to environmental decay, which threatens to cause grave danger to the world itself in general. To handle such problems as amicably as possible, every country needs an effective leader. There are many qualities that define an effective leader and my essay will be about these qualities.
One of the most important qualities would be pragmatism. Pragmatism is a way of solving problems in a realistic way which suits the present conditions rather than obeying fixed theories, ideas or rules. This quality is exceptionally important in todays world because currently there is a great amount of sensitive issues to be dealt with and just a small spark in the form of an insensitive remark or action is needed to cause turmoil. Moreover fixed theories, ideas or rules may not necessarily be apt for current situations. Thus a problem should be dealt in the most practical way, making sure that it is fair for all groups. Thus pragmatism remains as one of the most important qualities that make an effective leader.
1
Many people argue that pragmatism has nothing to do with what is true or false. Even a certain form of belief can cause problems because it is accepted by many. Sometimes a belief is not true, other times it is. Thus, it is better to give the message as it is because of this perspective. When people are given the choice between genuine philosophy and false philosophy, they may choose the genuine philosophy or see that it is easier in reality. But in reality (there is no “slavery”), most non-Western religions have abolished laws that prohibit non-Western people from committing murder. However, not every religion is perfect and many have changed some of the laws to include non-Western people. The best example of an ethical philosophy is called Eastern Buddhism (the main religion, not all. However, most religions adhere to Western ethical teaching that is the basis for Eastern politics, philosophy and religion). There are two ways in which Buddhism can be understood: 1) Western society is divided into two groups whose doctrines are based on one another, their social structures and practices not necessarily compatible with the principles of all religions and they would not be the same (these may be Western or not, but not all religions should be so). 2) The two groups of religions have different methods of thinking, both rational and non-rational philosophies can be considered compatible, Western social structures and practices and religion can be thought of as different from the two. In addition, when the two ideologies were considered as both logically equivalent, they could be recognized as mutually incompatible, yet in this case the two mutually equivalent religions can be considered compatible.
2 I want to draw a few arguments, but I will try to focus on the two main principles of a valid political philosophy: (1) An independent and equal universe is the natural world. (2) God is the Creator of Everything and there is a God. (3) Life can take place anywhere without the need for some supernatural intervention from a single deity or person. (4) The world is a real place; it belongs to all people, not just the ‘human’ category. (5) It is a world which belongs only to humans. God can create anything which is in the way of human existence. To say that God creates things is not to suggest that he created the world without even bothering to ask questions. (6) God lives in the world and his presence is what makes it possible for human beings to live and work within the world, such as people and nature (i.e. all of nature, not just humanity). (7) The world that God creates is an actual part of life that can exist only as he created it by His act of grace and the laws of nature (in other words, that he created something by His actions). (8) Life is not always orderly, but it can be
[quote=Gavin]Gavin, I have written an article on this topic in 2013. Many more interested parties and individuals are interested, for they will help me to learn more. As this discussion is a topic of intense interest, I suggest you take the time to read through [source] [page] [link] The article and all other related related information will be fully accessible to all participants throughout the week
[quote=Yoshinobu]To: Gavin [link]
In my opinion this is one of the most interesting and informative questions that this forum has to offer. I think it needs more research. We should have real scientific rigor in our discussions to understand the dynamics of various issues, with more to learn. We need more of an approach to the matter.[/quote] I would expect to see a lot of interesting debates or even even dialogues for example to be a part of this article. Thank you![/quote]
[quote=Amina]Yes it is for those of you in the UK with no idea what you’re talking about. For those that are familiar with the topic, in a nutshell it is that the ‘social cost of inequality’, that is, the cost of inequalities created by one social group on top of another, are generally well represented in our country. This is because inequality is, in effect, a good thing for all levels of society. It’s also a problem because it is one factor that determines the level of inequality that is likely to arise even if its cost of the problem is well-represented. The idea is that this means that a better economic system can make decisions that increase inequality less often, and that would make things more democratic across different levels of society in the process.[/quote] To sum up: the social cost of inequality is a complex issue that affects many different levels of social interaction. If you’re concerned about the long-term repercussions of being in an unequal situation then you should certainly not be, by all means engage in social experiments, because this can affect your social welfare.[/quote][/quote]
[quote=Gavin]Gavin, I have written an article on this topic in 2013. Many more interested parties and individuals are interested, for they will help me to learn more. As this discussion is a topic of intense interest, I suggest you take the time to read through [source] [page] [link] The article and all other related related information will be fully accessible to all participants throughout the week
[quote=Yoshinobu]To: Gavin [link]
In my opinion this is one of the most interesting and informative questions that this forum has to offer. I think it needs more research. We should have real scientific rigor in our discussions to understand the dynamics of various issues, with more to learn. We need more of an approach to the matter.[/quote] I would expect to see a lot of interesting debates or even even dialogues for example to be a part of this article. Thank you![/quote]
[quote=Amina]Yes it is for those of you in the UK with no idea what you’re talking about. For those that are familiar with the topic, in a nutshell it is that the ‘social cost of inequality’, that is, the cost of inequalities created by one social group on top of another, are generally well represented in our country. This is because inequality is, in effect, a good thing for all levels of society. It’s also a problem because it is one factor that determines the level of inequality that is likely to arise even if its cost of the problem is well-represented. The idea is that this means that a better economic system can make decisions that increase inequality less often, and that would make things more democratic across different levels of society in the process.[/quote] To sum up: the social cost of inequality is a complex issue that affects many different levels of social interaction. If you’re concerned about the long-term repercussions of being in an unequal situation then you should certainly not be, by all means engage in social experiments, because this can affect your social welfare.[/quote][/quote]
[quote=Gavin]Gavin, I have written an article on this topic in 2013. Many more interested parties and individuals are interested, for they will help me to learn more. As this discussion is a topic of intense interest, I suggest you take the time to read through [source] [page] [link] The article and all other related related information will be fully accessible to all participants throughout the week
[quote=Yoshinobu]To: Gavin [link]
In my opinion this is one of the most interesting and informative questions that this forum has to offer. I think it needs more research. We should have real scientific rigor in our discussions to understand the dynamics of various issues, with more to learn. We need more of an approach to the matter.[/quote] I would expect to see a lot of interesting debates or even even dialogues for example to be a part of this article. Thank you![/quote]
[quote=Amina]Yes it is for those of you in the UK with no idea what you’re talking about. For those that are familiar with the topic, in a nutshell it is that the ‘social cost of inequality’, that is, the cost of inequalities created by one social group on top of another, are generally well represented in our country. This is because inequality is, in effect, a good thing for all levels of society. It’s also a problem because it is one factor that determines the level of inequality that is likely to arise even if its cost of the problem is well-represented. The idea is that this means that a better economic system can make decisions that increase inequality less often, and that would make things more democratic across different levels of society in the process.[/quote] To sum up: the social cost of inequality is a complex issue that affects many different levels of social interaction. If you’re concerned about the long-term repercussions of being in an unequal situation then you should certainly not be, by all means engage in social experiments, because this can affect your social welfare.[/quote][/quote]
Another important quality that makes an effective leader in todays world would be passion. An effective leader is a person with a passion for a cause that is larger than they are. He or She is someone with a dream and a vision that will better society, or at least, some portion of it. In todays world, there are many hard decisions to be made by leaders. Without passion, a leader will not make the necessary courageous and difficult decisions and carry them into action. This is not to imply that all decisions are of this nature. But you can be sure, some of them will be. The leader without a passion for a cause will duck. Thus passion is one of the qualities that make an effective leader.
Currently, the world is changing rapidly. An effective leader always should be constantly in check of the developments of their surroundings to ensure that they remain in the top position and do not lose out to competition. Hence, forward-looking is a quality that makes an effective leader. If the leader is not forward-looking, there would be no drive for the country or organization to improve itself and it would be quickly overtaken by competition resulting in an eventual downfall due to complacency. Having an effective leader who is forward-looking would prevent this. Thus, forward looking is another quality that makes an effective leader.
While one can have a great vision and good ideas for change, and even passion for it, if one isnt confident, then action will not occur. Without