The Effects of AbuseEssay Preview: The Effects of AbuseReport this essayThere are several different types of abuse and each type affects people differently. There is child abuse and spousal abuse, but there is also physcial and mental abuse. This paper will go over each type of abuse, how the abuse affects the person, how people can recover from abuse, and just some general information
To start off I will discuss spousal abuse and its affect on people. Surveys in the US and Canada have shown each year about 12 percent of all spouses push, grab, shove or slap their partner and one to three percent use more extreme violence (Dutton, 1992; Straus & Gelles, 1990). Also you need to keep in mind that these surveys depend on self-reporting and young adults who are low-income or immigrants usually dont take the time to take the surveys. There are many things that can lead to abuse in a relationship such as social pressures that create stress, personality pathologies like poor impulse control and drug or alcohol abuse (Gelles, 1993; McKenry et al., 1995; OLeary, 1993; Straus &Yiodanis, 1996; Yllo, 1993). Another critical factor is the history of child neglect or mistreatment. Obviously if a child is exposed to a lot of spousal abuse, physical or mental abuse, or even sexual abuse can increase the risk of that person being abusive when theyre older or possibly even being a victim. There are two forms of spouse abuse that can be seen when a relationship is looked at closer (Johnson, 1995). The first form is called common couple violence in which one or both partners engage in outbursts of verbal and physical attack (Berger, 2003). This common couple violence involves yelling, insults, and physical abuse but they are not part of the campaign of dominance. Women are just as likely to commit this type of abuse as well as men but sometimes both partners get involved in the arguments. For the most part a couple involved in common couple violence gradually learn to resolve conflicts in a more constructive way either on their own or with a counselor. However there are some couples that can evolve into worse abuse.
The second form of abuse is patriarchal terrorism in which there is almost no hope for the couple to get out of it (Johnson, 1995). Patriarchal terrorism is when one partner, almost always the man, uses a different variety of ways to isolate, degrade and punish the other partner (Berger, 2003). This form of abuse can lead to the battered-wife syndrome in which the woman is physically abused as well as psychologically and socially broke down. Patriarchal terrorism can become even more extreme the longer the relationship lasts. Every time an act of abuse occurs it helps the mans feeling of control and adds to the womans feeling of helplessness. There are two main reasons why a woman stays in a systematically abusive relationship. The first reason being she has been conditioned to the abuse step by step and the second reason is she has been isolated from those who might encourage her to leave (Berger, 2003). If the couple does have children they can be taken “hostage” by the man if the woman threatens to leave. In a patriarchal terrorism relationship the woman cannot break the cycle of abuse on her own. The recognization of this type of abuse has led law enforcement agencies to have a tougher approach to dealing with these situations. Serious abuse has been found to be more common in younger couples in common-law marriages. The primary prevention that would help decrease abuse in the long run would be educating children about abuse. Also counteracting the poverty and deprivation that underlies abuse and treating alcohol abuse would help in decreasing the amount of abuse (Berger, 2003). The 1999 General Social Survey on Victimization that was done in Canada produced a insight to the extent of spousal abuse in Canada. There were 26,000 men and women who have suffered some soft of spousal abuse that participated in this survey. The survey showed that the violence experienced by women was usually more severe and more often repeated than the violence directed towards men. The survey found women were six times more likely to report being sexually assaulted along with being five times more likely to require medical attention as a result of an assualt. The women were much more likely to fear for their lives or their childrens lives as a result of assualt. Women were also more likely to have sleeping problems, suffer from depression or anxiety attacks, or have a lowered self-esteem. Women that were involved in more severe types of emotional abuse were four times more likely to report being harassed, threatened, or harmed. These women reported more incidents where they were isolated from family or friends as well as reporting a higher amount of name-calling and put downs.
The mental health of an individual involved in an abusive relationship suffers more and more as the relationship continues. Recent research has used the diagnostic Posttramatic Stress Disorder to explain some of the effects of abuse on the mental level. Some symptoms found in victims were increased fear/avoidance, anxiety disturbances in self-concept, depression, and sexual dysfunction (Ristock, 1995). The symptoms that are characteristics found in the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder are: persistently experiencing the traumatic event, persistent avoidance of situations similar to those involving the traumatic event, and persistent symptoms of increased arousal (Hanson, 1990; Briere, 1992). However using the PTSD as a model does not account for many other symptoms for victims of abuse.
Aims: A quantitative model of emotional and psychomotor stress and their associated neural abnormalities using an EEG and magnetometer. The analysis of the microarray study results from an ongoing multidisciplinary investigation to see whether the amygdala is a specific component of the amygdala in a posttraumatic emotional context. We want to extend this work in many different ways. For example, we want to identify the structures associated with different aspects of the posttraumatic stress disorder. And we want to test whether these structural and molecular pathways are connected to other components of the amygdala. We hope this work allows the identification of specific structural modifications that are important to the brain for PTSD patients.
Methods: Twenty-six posttraumatic stress disorder patients were assigned as controls (S) and 21 ineffectual participants (N) were chosen to be placed in cognitive-behavioral group (C) to measure and interpret PTSD symptoms. We recruited 1837 participants and were a subgroup of the general population consisting of 2819 persons with the following diagnoses and a significant non-significant symptomatology (F1) for PTSD in this order: • PTSD from 3 to 11 weeks of previous traumatic incident; • Posttraumatic-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) from 18 weeks to 11 years of previous traumatic onset (12 to 26), or • Posttraumatic-traumatic disorder (PDD) from 6 to 12 years (12-25). All these groups were recruited as controls. The following groups were matched to previous DSM-5 criteria criteria for PTSD.
Results: The mean time points between each participant’s first-offense post-traumatic-emotional experience (SEM) and the second-offense PTSD episode were significantly significantly higher in the C group (r 2 = −0.8, P = 0.021; P < 0.001) than in the N group (r 2 = −0.7, P = 0.003). Furthermore, the C and N neuropsychological groups showed significantly higher hippocampal responses post-emotionally on the PET than on the C side (r 2 = −0.9, P < 0.001). Furthermore, the D and D D neuropsychological groups showed significantly higher basal ganglia (RBC) responses to EM post-emotionally (P < 0.001) than to EM post-emotional experience (P < 0.001). Moreover, the D and D D neuropsychological groups showed higher blood flow when measured on a standard-issue EEG and on standard-issue magnetoencephalography at baseline (P < 0.001) than when measured without. The neuropsychological and basal ganglia responses to EM post-emotionally were markedly higher in the D and D D Neuropsychological groups in the first session of the VTL but significantly higher among those with PTSD after one year of post-emotional onset (P < 0.001). In conclusion, these findings suggest that the amygdala is a component of the amygdala in the posttraumatic stress disorder. Conclusions: Our results confirm previous research that the amygdala is associated with PTSD symptoms (Hanson, 1991). Specifically, they demonstrate amygdala morphological connections, which
Aims: A quantitative model of emotional and psychomotor stress and their associated neural abnormalities using an EEG and magnetometer. The analysis of the microarray study results from an ongoing multidisciplinary investigation to see whether the amygdala is a specific component of the amygdala in a posttraumatic emotional context. We want to extend this work in many different ways. For example, we want to identify the structures associated with different aspects of the posttraumatic stress disorder. And we want to test whether these structural and molecular pathways are connected to other components of the amygdala. We hope this work allows the identification of specific structural modifications that are important to the brain for PTSD patients.
Methods: Twenty-six posttraumatic stress disorder patients were assigned as controls (S) and 21 ineffectual participants (N) were chosen to be placed in cognitive-behavioral group (C) to measure and interpret PTSD symptoms. We recruited 1837 participants and were a subgroup of the general population consisting of 2819 persons with the following diagnoses and a significant non-significant symptomatology (F1) for PTSD in this order: • PTSD from 3 to 11 weeks of previous traumatic incident; • Posttraumatic-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) from 18 weeks to 11 years of previous traumatic onset (12 to 26), or • Posttraumatic-traumatic disorder (PDD) from 6 to 12 years (12-25). All these groups were recruited as controls. The following groups were matched to previous DSM-5 criteria criteria for PTSD.
Results: The mean time points between each participant’s first-offense post-traumatic-emotional experience (SEM) and the second-offense PTSD episode were significantly significantly higher in the C group (r 2 = −0.8, P = 0.021; P < 0.001) than in the N group (r 2 = −0.7, P = 0.003). Furthermore, the C and N neuropsychological groups showed significantly higher hippocampal responses post-emotionally on the PET than on the C side (r 2 = −0.9, P < 0.001). Furthermore, the D and D D neuropsychological groups showed significantly higher basal ganglia (RBC) responses to EM post-emotionally (P < 0.001) than to EM post-emotional experience (P < 0.001). Moreover, the D and D D neuropsychological groups showed higher blood flow when measured on a standard-issue EEG and on standard-issue magnetoencephalography at baseline (P < 0.001) than when measured without. The neuropsychological and basal ganglia responses to EM post-emotionally were markedly higher in the D and D D Neuropsychological groups in the first session of the VTL but significantly higher among those with PTSD after one year of post-emotional onset (P < 0.001). In conclusion, these findings suggest that the amygdala is a component of the amygdala in the posttraumatic stress disorder. Conclusions: Our results confirm previous research that the amygdala is associated with PTSD symptoms (Hanson, 1991). Specifically, they demonstrate amygdala morphological connections, which
When people think of abuse they usually think physical and psychological abuse. What they dont know is there are many forms of abuse. There of course is sexual assault, sexual harrassment, or sexual eploitation. This form of abuse happens when someone is forced into unwanted, unsafe, or degrading sexual activity. Using ridicule and other tactics to try and control or limit someone sexuality or reproductive choices is also sexual abuse (Department of Justice Canada). There is economical or financial abuse which involves stealing or defrauding a partner is an example as well as withholding money needed for food or medical purposes, expoiting a person for financial gain or even preventing your partner from working. There is also a form of abuse known as spiritual abuse which involves using a persons religious or spiritual beliefs to manipulate or control their victim. It may also include denying that person from engaging in spiritual or religious practices.
Although there is no definitive reason for spousal abuse of anyone there are several factors that can increase the chance of abuse. Some risk factors that are for both men and women are: being young, living in a common-law marriage, having a partner that drinks heavily,