Hhs Law Profile PaperEssay Preview: Hhs Law Profile PaperReport this essayLaw Profile 2Delivery of human services will be challenge with some form of dilemma that requires ethical reasoning. Building ethical framework is an essential tool of communication. According to Manning (2003), “the ethical framework includes the organizations mission, value statement, and ethical code.” (p. 221). Values are important elements of the organizations contract with the clients and serves as a guide in making a fair decision. The human service sectors are challenged with decisions that require ones honest opinion. Some human service workers may make unethical decisions that could result from a lack of knowledge and could be unethical unintentionally. By knowing the agencys policies of what is required as a professional worker will help prevent ethical dilemmas. One known dilemma that human service workers have been faced with is the behavior of discrimination. Discrimination is defined as the act of recognizing or making a difference in distinctions. It is an unethical and illegal act to discriminate against clients and their rights.
First and foremost, leaders are responsible for maintaining standards that promotes an organization free from discrimination. The human service sector should generate an ethical system that enforces application of the organizations rules and principles. Human service workers should perform professionally in all aspects of business. They should avoid demeaning conduct and treat all clients equally, fairly, and without any discrimination. Each client should be treated with respect, dignity, and acceptance. However, workers should be aware of state, federal, and local laws. In addition, the organizations policy should address expectations of services that are provided to clients as well as informing clients of their rights. If a client feels that their rights have been violated and are being treated differently and unjust, consequently, they may seek justice through the law.
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VI), as Amended, is a law that impacts the delivery of human services. This law was enacted as part of the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964. Its primary purpose according to United States Department of Justice is “to prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, and national origin in programs and activities receiving federal financial assistances.” The ethical dilemma in the 1960s caused for such law to be enforced. The United States Department of Justice website, www.usdoj.gov/crt/cor/coord/titlevi.php is a reliable resource that is available to learn about the Title IV of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Furthermore, it provides other reliable resources such as the Title VI hotline number (1-888-848-5306) and the Title VI Legal Manual (HTML or PDF). Section 2000d of the manual provides a more detailed description of general rules, regulations, and orders
, in particular provisions in the statute that apply to civil rights.
A law or other legal fact that conflicts with or affects the substantive rights of another person is deemed a denial to, or failure to provide adequate assistance. For example, in determining whether an organization’s mission is a violation of your rights and under what law or legal theories do you take the action? What does the civil rights law define? What constitutes a denial and is a denial only due to a lack of resources? In this case, there have been, and continue to be, other forms of denial: discrimination for sexual orientation; in the context of civil rights law, a denial is a denial of the right to be treated as a human being, or of the need for an equal opportunity to receive education and services based on your sexual orientation or gender identity; and a denial that you are denied services that could improve your situation. The basic question: what actions are required to satisfy a denial? The most important part of the legal response: the denial of your individual right to an equal opportunity. If you are denied a service under a governmental regulation, or the requirement that you provide services based on your sexual orientation or gender identity and the organization’s purpose, you may be denied services under a federal law that limits discrimination, in the amount or duration specified in the statute. You may also be denied services by state or federal law, because the statute would interfere with your ability to work. However, the federal statute does not specifically restrict your ability to discriminate. It explicitly does not deny you an equal protection right that you may have under local law (such as your right to hire a lawyer) and federal law that governs financial assistance. The following are the specific actions that are required to comply with the denial or denial of your rights:
• The organization’s mission to discriminate; and
• If your decision to take your rights to object will result in a reduction of your educational or employment rights.
For more information on the civil rights or discrimination laws, see the Department of Justice’s Web site https://www.usdoj.gov/crt/crt.php
A denial of social or political benefits under a federal law may result in a higher cost. For instance, a federal statute that does not require the recipient of social services to disclose that you are one percent gay or transgender or to provide such services must be followed. The following actions must be taken to comply with the statute:
• The organization’s mission to deny human resources services; and
• Failure to comply with any of these actions.
A denial of services under a federal law may have adverse consequences. For example, for some statutes, such as title V, these may result in a change in the outcome of the litigation. Thus, a federal law would make it more difficult (and/or costly) to prevent discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. In addition, the federal law does not create a single agency to determine what type of assistance you will receive under federal law or what state or federal agency you will be assigned to. In many instances, you will actually have to choose. In that instance, a denial of benefits would result in greater discrimination and additional cost. You may choose between the state law that prohibits this discrimination and the federal law that does not prohibit this discrimination. In some instances, you could have to provide basic services outside the United States. For example, in the state of California, where the law requires public universities to provide students who perform sex or gender based educational activities in an environment that would result