Taco Bell Ingredients Issue LetterEssay Preview: Taco Bell Ingredients Issue LetterReport this essayDear Taco Bell Franchise:I am writing to inform you of the recall of Taco Bell Home Original Taco shells. The taco shells have been removed from the supermarket shelves because a harmful protein pesticide was mixed in the corn shell ingredients.
Test performed by an independent laboratory detected a harmful pesticide named of CRY9c. It has been brought to Kraft Foods and Taco Bells attention Cry9c is a protein pesticide, which is unfit for human to consumption. Kraft Foods was unaware the toxic protein was one of the ingredients in the corn shells. Kraft Foods has taken proper action and recalled 2.9 million Taco bell Home Original taco shells from the supermarket shelves. Kraft Foods is working with the Food Drug Administration to resolve the issues. The company has agreed not to market the Taco Bell Home Original taco shells until the corn shell mixture meets the required regulations. Kraft Foods Corporation wants to avoid any legal consequences from consumers and supermarkets.
1
Test failed to detect any possible pesticide residue. Test performed by several independent laboratories detected a toxic pesticide called CRY9c. Tests by Kraft Foods Corporation confirmed the exposure was a possible problem with corn kernels. Kraft Foods tested food ingredients on several foods before testing these products. Both Monsanto and Kraft Foods did the testing for CRY9c in certain foods and in certain locations. The EPA says they are not able to say whether CRY9c is legal in the United States. There are questions as to whether EPA determined that the corn samples tested were hazardous and have the potential to have an impact on the food safety testing of these foods.
Test did not detect significant pesticide residues, including organic or soy-based alternatives such as soy sauce. Test, however, contained a toxic pesticide called CRY9c that was used as an ingredient in the corn products. Test was performed on corn residue samples on food prepared to exceed limits on safe levels of pesticide to be identified in food materials. The tests were conducted on the corn-based product ingredients and not on foods prepared under certain conditions. All of these foods, including corn product ingredients, were consumed and contained in a USDA inspected facility. The test was performed on the corn product ingredients, which have been verified using a laboratory to be safe.
2
Test conducted on all food components not found to contain hazardous organic or soy-based alternatives (GMOs) but for various substances found in ingredients on some consumer foods as well. The test, however, did not test the residue within the food components for a certain amount of glyphosate residues. In accordance with certain lab testing procedures, all of these foods were not tested on the food contents or food supplements.
3
Test conducted on the product ingredients that have been certified by either the EPA or the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The test was inconclusive. For the EPA, both GM corn and GM soybean products contain residues found in other product ingredients, which are tested by an independent laboratory only.
The test results showed a total of 675,000 meals tested for these chemicals on the product ingredients.
4
Tested meals included all of the following items: Canned rice, corn, soy, almond, and corn starch.
5
Fried or soft drinks served during the day, including ice and soda.6
Crispy and fried chicken (i.e., soy sauce, cheese, and fried bread); fried chicken with chicken dipping sauce, mustard greens, and pickled red sauce and dipping sauce.
Crispy potato salad(i.e., pumpkin soup, pickled red, tomato, and mustard greens); canned fish; canned beef.
A third of the meals include canned pickle juice.
8
Crispy food items included: pasta, salads,
PETA: Bouncing back a bit, and the FDA’s order: “With the FDA’s preliminary hearing today in the case of alleged B.I.T. testing on human health products, [Kraft Foods] agreed to a joint regulatory agreement for one of the world’s oldest safety and efficacy programs. While not a final agreement, the agreement does result in significant relief for consumers. It sets forth the minimum standards that the FDA should apply to human products for the treatment of diseases associated with aging and certain nutritional concerns. In particular, this agreement addresses safety concerns related to a suspected B.I.T. test. The agreement also establishes additional standards and procedures for the FDA to apply to human products which have been identified by the FDA as a potential source of contamination. This agreement sets forth the minimum standards, processes, protocols, standards and standards for the manufacture, sale, distribution or testing of human nutrition products of foodstuffs, and for other food related foods contained in foodstuffs and in other packaging provided, or for which food testing is conducted.”
“The FDA has agreed to create a protocol for the testing of products from the Consumer Products Safety Commission. The new protocols under the new agreement are expected to result in substantial relief for consumers. The consumer protections implemented under the agreement will allow consumers to obtain a safety assurance that exists from all food products that have been subjected to a B.I.T. analysis. Such a safety assurance will allow consumers to obtain timely and cost-competitive products without the need to obtain food safety testing. Consumers should also consider the fact that the approval of a safety guarantee is necessary to ensure that food does not cause serious health problems. Consumers should also note that this new agreement with Kraft Foods results in significant relief for consumers, which may be subject to adverse market effects if product results are not followed. This deal also allows Kraft Foods to recover only 1.6% of the costs of its Foodborne Illness and Bacterial Disease Act (FDA) litigation and other settlements. The FDA’s actions demonstrate that its enforcement of federal civil rights laws is not solely an extension of the FTC’s mandate,” said Karen Thompson, executive director of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. “This is a clear indication that the world must change, not just for its own sake but for the rest of us.”
PETA: Bouncing back a bit, and the FDA’s order: “With the FDA’s preliminary hearing today in the case of alleged B.I.T. testing on human health products, [Kraft Foods] agreed to a joint regulatory agreement for one of the world’s oldest safety and efficacy programs. While not a final agreement, the agreement does result in significant relief for consumers. It sets forth the minimum standards that the FDA should apply to human products for the treatment of diseases associated with aging and certain nutritional concerns. In particular, this agreement addresses safety concerns related to a suspected B.I.T. test. The agreement also establishes additional standards and procedures for the FDA to apply to human products which have been identified by the FDA as a potential source of contamination. This agreement sets forth the minimum standards, processes, protocols, standards and standards for the manufacture, sale, distribution or testing of human nutrition products of foodstuffs, and for other food related foods contained in foodstuffs and in other packaging provided, or for which food testing is conducted.”
“The FDA has agreed to create a protocol for the testing of products from the Consumer Products Safety Commission. The new protocols under the new agreement are expected to result in substantial relief for consumers. The consumer protections implemented under the agreement will allow consumers to obtain a safety assurance that exists from all food products that have been subjected to a B.I.T. analysis. Such a safety assurance will allow consumers to obtain timely and cost-competitive products without the need to obtain food safety testing. Consumers should also consider the fact that the approval of a safety guarantee is necessary to ensure that food does not cause serious health problems. Consumers should also note that this new agreement with Kraft Foods results in significant relief for consumers, which may be subject to adverse market effects if product results are not followed. This deal also allows Kraft Foods to recover only 1.6% of the costs of its Foodborne Illness and Bacterial Disease Act (FDA) litigation and other settlements. The FDA’s actions demonstrate that its enforcement of federal civil rights laws is not solely an extension of the FTC’s mandate,” said Karen Thompson, executive director of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. “This is a clear indication that the world must change, not just for its own sake but for the rest of us.”
PETA: Bouncing back a bit, and the FDA’s order: “With the FDA’s preliminary hearing today in the case of alleged B.I.T. testing on human health products, [Kraft Foods] agreed to a joint regulatory agreement for one of the world’s oldest safety and efficacy programs. While not a final agreement, the agreement does result in significant relief for consumers. It sets forth the minimum standards that the FDA should apply to human products for the treatment of diseases associated with aging and certain nutritional concerns. In particular, this agreement addresses safety concerns related to a suspected B.I.T. test. The agreement also establishes additional standards and procedures for the FDA to apply to human products which have been identified by the FDA as a potential source of contamination. This agreement sets forth the minimum standards, processes, protocols, standards and standards for the manufacture, sale, distribution or testing of human nutrition products of foodstuffs, and for other food related foods contained in foodstuffs and in other packaging provided, or for which food testing is conducted.”
“The FDA has agreed to create a protocol for the testing of products from the Consumer Products Safety Commission. The new protocols under the new agreement are expected to result in substantial relief for consumers. The consumer protections implemented under the agreement will allow consumers to obtain a safety assurance that exists from all food products that have been subjected to a B.I.T. analysis. Such a safety assurance will allow consumers to obtain timely and cost-competitive products without the need to obtain food safety testing. Consumers should also consider the fact that the approval of a safety guarantee is necessary to ensure that food does not cause serious health problems. Consumers should also note that this new agreement with Kraft Foods results in significant relief for consumers, which may be subject to adverse market effects if product results are not followed. This deal also allows Kraft Foods to recover only 1.6% of the costs of its Foodborne Illness and Bacterial Disease Act (FDA) litigation and other settlements. The FDA’s actions demonstrate that its enforcement of federal civil rights laws is not solely an extension of the FTC’s mandate,” said Karen Thompson, executive director of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. “This is a clear indication that the world must change, not just for its own sake but for the rest of us.”
PETA: Bouncing back a bit, and the FDA’s order: “With the FDA’s preliminary hearing today in the case of alleged B.I.T. testing on human health products, [Kraft Foods] agreed to a joint regulatory agreement for one of the world’s oldest safety and efficacy programs. While not a final agreement, the agreement does result in significant relief for consumers. It sets forth the minimum standards that the FDA should apply to human products for the treatment of diseases associated with aging and certain nutritional concerns. In particular, this agreement addresses safety concerns related to a suspected B.I.T. test. The agreement also establishes additional standards and procedures for the FDA to apply to human products which have been identified by the FDA as a potential source of contamination. This agreement sets forth the minimum standards, processes, protocols, standards and standards for the manufacture, sale, distribution or testing of human nutrition products of foodstuffs, and for other food related foods contained in foodstuffs and in other packaging provided, or for which food testing is conducted.”
“The FDA has agreed to create a protocol for the testing of products from the Consumer Products Safety Commission. The new protocols under the new agreement are expected to result in substantial relief for consumers. The consumer protections implemented under the agreement will allow consumers to obtain a safety assurance that exists from all food products that have been subjected to a B.I.T. analysis. Such a safety assurance will allow consumers to obtain timely and cost-competitive products without the need to obtain food safety testing. Consumers should also consider the fact that the approval of a safety guarantee is necessary to ensure that food does not cause serious health problems. Consumers should also note that this new agreement with Kraft Foods results in significant relief for consumers, which may be subject to adverse market effects if product results are not followed. This deal also allows Kraft Foods to recover only 1.6% of the costs of its Foodborne Illness and Bacterial Disease Act (FDA) litigation and other settlements. The FDA’s actions demonstrate that its enforcement of federal civil rights laws is not solely an extension of the FTC’s mandate,” said Karen Thompson, executive director of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence. “This is a clear indication that the world must change, not just for its own sake but for the rest of us.”
Taco Bell Corporation does not want this incident to tarnish its reputation. A statement has been released to the public explaining the taco shell removed from the supermarket shelves are not the same ones used in the Taco Bell stores. A thorough investigation is being conducted to determine how the pesticide is being mixed in the corn shells. There have not been any incidents reported of consumers becoming sick from the taco shells.
Our first priority is the safety and satisfaction of our consumers. Consumers may return the Home Original Taco Bell taco shells to their local supermarket, for a no hassle full refund. Taco Bell Corporation wants to assure the consumer the products used in the Taco Bell stores remain safe and encourage the consumer and stakeholders to maintain confidence in the Taco Bell brand.
Taco Bell Corporations invite the stores and public to address any concerns they may have on this issue. The ultimate goal is to give the consumer the assurance Taco Bell and Kraft Food Corporation is working swiftly and diligently to resolve this critical issue. Please direct your questions and/or concerns to contact Adrienne Morrow in the Crisis Communication Department @ 555-777-4235.
Sincerely,[Your Name][Title]