Business Research EthicsEssay Preview: Business Research EthicsReport this essayBusiness Research EthicsEthics in business research refers to the code of conduct that is projected to be scrutinized while conducting the research. The ethical conduct affects equally the company and the individuals researching the conduct. The ethical behavior should be taking into account in each step of the research process from data collection and analysis, to reporting the findings. If the company or individual researcher does not stand by the code of ethics for the business research, he or she could end up confronting penalties from lawsuits to legal penalties.
In 2007, a lawsuit was filed against CVS Caremark pharmacies by the community pharmacist for disclosing information in the interest of financial gain from its patients. “American Pharmacies members are business entrepreneurs who can compete with all entities. Regrettably, the CVS Caremark merger has breached the principles of fair play on which our country so proudly stands. It is for these reasons that American Pharmacies proudly supports the courageous actions of its Board members, the six plaintiff pharmacies (Businesswire.com, March 24, 2011).” The six plaintiff pharmacies are Rogers Pharmacy, Victoria, Brookshire Bro. Pharmacy of Kirbyville, Hometown Pharmacy, Fairfield, Hibbs Pharmacy, Bay City, Kinseys Pharmacy, Tyler, and De La Rosa Pharmacy, Weslaco.
The lawsuit was filed in the federal court in September 2010 in which it accuses CVS Caremark of violating the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) and the use of misappropriate trade secrets. The complaint also stated that CVS Caremark required the patients to purchased medications and maintained the purchase only from CVS Caremark, which that is a violation of the Texas “Any Willing Provider” law. CVS Caremark affected the patients and physicians contract to only be able to obtain the prescription from the CVS Pharmacies by which it would financially benefit CVS Caremark. Caremark mailed letters out to patients that used independent pharmacies warning them that if he or she would continue to fill their prescriptions in their current pharmacy they would be subject to an increase in their prescription copay.
The unethical behavior that affected the organizations and individuals are the patients, the physicians and the independent pharmacies. Which in this unethical research behavior it violated the patients privacy, as the patient placed their trust on CVS Caremark in receiving the best prescription drugs plans for their costs associated with their medical plans. The patients were forced to pay a higher copayment and move to a CVS Caremark pharmacy. This situation installs fear on the patients making it unethical on the patients privacy of choosing the pharmacy he or she wanted to use and fear of losing their insurance coverage. In the case of the physicians if they would not participate, they would
The unethical activity is known to the patient, and the pharmacy is not only responsible for the unethical behavior there. But one of the things that the patients have not heard about is that CVS Caremark took the time and work out of the practice and took their patients to a CVS pharmacy that was actually in the hospital.
What is the problem
I find it difficult to understand how anyone could think that they had a problem with their family doctor when they are not involved in doing a legitimate doctor’s practice. This is like saying they are working two jobs and should be focused on one but don’t have a real job to do other work.
That is bad for public health. We should not allow that situation to continue.
There is actually a small group of people who have been in and out of the hospital for a while. But, they are all professionals and it is unethical to work as a team, to do your own research you study, not to support one’s own profession (I know I have done), and not to have a good idea about what you are doing. They work on this particular patient’s case against what has done the most. No one is doing that. It is illegal and unethical.
In the case before my daughter’s accident in March 2011, she was trying to get medical benefits by using a CVS Caremark drug, and she found the other side was not worth the money. We had her do some digging and it turned into a complicated case, and now she is back to living her life off of the CVS Caremark, where the law allows this kind of illegal business.
If you do research and follow through with your research, it may have led to more ethical decisions to be made with the patients. Some of the doctors who have done the research and this was going to affect them are trying to put their patients’ privacy at risk. But how does that go?
How do you tell if it wasn’t done correctly?
For all of those things that have to go right, there is an ethical system so there is nothing there but ethical conduct with ethical conduct. I know that when you have a health care provider who has a high level understanding of what the risks are, what the benefits are, what are the costs, what are the outcomes, what are the consequences. It’s unethical.
So you were going to tell them to get the drug, and after three hours of that, the doctor decided to go ahead and take them. They have never heard from you. Maybe you will find it interesting. I hope.
It makes it clearer that that wasn’t done properly.
What are ethical practices in your practice?
Most of your ethical practices are very straightforward. It is usually just making sure patients know some basic facts