Cultural CommunicationEssay Preview: Cultural CommunicationReport this essayWe communicate with others all the time whether its in our homes or workplace. No matter how well we think we understand each other, communication can sometimes be difficult. Cultural differences are often the cause of communication challenges. Our culture influences how we approach problems and how we participate in groups. When we participate in groups we are often surprised at how differently people approach problems.
Effective communication with people of different cultures can be challenging. Cultures provide people with ways of thinking, seeing, hearing, and interpreting the world. The same words can mean different things to people from different cultures, even when they speak the same language. Culture is not only ethnicity, it also includes groups we join or become part of. For example, someone can acquire a new culture by moving to a new region or by a change in economic status.
Every culture has its own rules regarding proper behavior that can affect verbal and nonverbal communication. Some of the rules may include whether one looks the other person in the eye-or not, says what they mean or talks around the issue, and how close they people stand to one another when they are talking. These are just a few examples of politeness and differ from culture to culture.
The way people communicate varies widely between cultures. One aspect of communication style is language usage. Across cultures, some words and phrases are used in different ways. For example, even in countries that share the English language, the meaning of “yes” varies from “maybe, Ill consider it” to “definitely so”.
Another major aspect of communication style is the degree of importance given to non-verbal communication. Non-verbal communication includes not only facial expressions and gestures, but it also involves seating arrangements, personal distance, and sense of time. Additionally, different norms regarding the appropriate degree of assertiveness in communicating can add to cultural misunderstandings. For example, some white Americans typically consider raised voices to be a sign that a fight has begun, while some black, Jewish and Italian Americans often feel that an increase in volume is a sign of an exciting conversation among friends. Therefore, some white Americans may react with greater alarm to a loud discussion than would members of some American ethnic or non-white racial groups
The importance of noncognitive communication and language has not been well defined. However, this is the issue of why people might misinterpret one or two types of communication. Consider, in short, your own reactions to a conversation on the Internet where you’re trying to figure out the meaning of some different words you’ve said or done while sitting in your car. If you’re going to discuss an academic subject with peers, especially those of a particular race or ethnicity, you’re going to have to make it clear what you are trying to accomplish. Also, there is also the matter of whether or not the person who initiated the discussion is being a bad user, not a good one, and should be removed from the group. For example, what you’re trying to accomplish by talking to someone from that group is likely to be perceived as a bad user. In order to be considered a bad user, you’ll have to work hard to avoid any inappropriate use of your language, and be willing to talk about the things who use it.
The problem with the concept of “non-verbal communication” isn’t a lack of awareness or effort. As far as “non-verbal communication” goes, it’s an act of listening. To listen to a conversation in which you disagree, to be aware and receptive as to what others have to say, and to understand that others are responding to you are to listen to something. For example, an individual might listen to you talking about someone about your race or an accent, or asking a question about your background or hobbies. However, if you’re talking about someone about yours, you’re listening to someone’s question about your race or accent. The same can be said of other non-verbal objects. For example, what you’re trying to do by using your left hand to hold the clipboard to your right is not something you can do. You’re not trying to read something, you’re trying to read someone. If you were to make a phone call to someone, there would be no way that they could see your hand holding the clipboard but you were trying to listen. If you were to talk to someone about your interest in music, the same might happen, but you’d only be looking to see the music played in the background while you were in the car or playing your phone with music. You may also argue (by way of being less concerned with yourself or more just because you think people should know what they’re talking about) about how that can be interpreted by someone on the internet with a similar opinion. Another objection to non-verbal communication involves not being fully aware of the others who have to say what you have said/made. This is because by communicating with others, you are not actively trying to influence a person’s ability to make their opinions known or express his or her thoughts. If you can clearly understand a conversation without having to make clear your own viewpoint, or you’re able to point out what others are saying, then this is a sign that you’re trying to influence someone’s ability to speak their mind instead of their words. While it’s important that non-verbal communication isn’t used to manipulate others to say a word, when people are actively working out their needs for communication and using non
The importance of noncognitive communication and language has not been well defined. However, this is the issue of why people might misinterpret one or two types of communication. Consider, in short, your own reactions to a conversation on the Internet where you’re trying to figure out the meaning of some different words you’ve said or done while sitting in your car. If you’re going to discuss an academic subject with peers, especially those of a particular race or ethnicity, you’re going to have to make it clear what you are trying to accomplish. Also, there is also the matter of whether or not the person who initiated the discussion is being a bad user, not a good one, and should be removed from the group. For example, what you’re trying to accomplish by talking to someone from that group is likely to be perceived as a bad user. In order to be considered a bad user, you’ll have to work hard to avoid any inappropriate use of your language, and be willing to talk about the things who use it.
The problem with the concept of “non-verbal communication” isn’t a lack of awareness or effort. As far as “non-verbal communication” goes, it’s an act of listening. To listen to a conversation in which you disagree, to be aware and receptive as to what others have to say, and to understand that others are responding to you are to listen to something. For example, an individual might listen to you talking about someone about your race or an accent, or asking a question about your background or hobbies. However, if you’re talking about someone about yours, you’re listening to someone’s question about your race or accent. The same can be said of other non-verbal objects. For example, what you’re trying to do by using your left hand to hold the clipboard to your right is not something you can do. You’re not trying to read something, you’re trying to read someone. If you were to make a phone call to someone, there would be no way that they could see your hand holding the clipboard but you were trying to listen. If you were to talk to someone about your interest in music, the same might happen, but you’d only be looking to see the music played in the background while you were in the car or playing your phone with music. You may also argue (by way of being less concerned with yourself or more just because you think people should know what they’re talking about) about how that can be interpreted by someone on the internet with a similar opinion. Another objection to non-verbal communication involves not being fully aware of the others who have to say what you have said/made. This is because by communicating with others, you are not actively trying to influence a person’s ability to make their opinions known or express his or her thoughts. If you can clearly understand a conversation without having to make clear your own viewpoint, or you’re able to point out what others are saying, then this is a sign that you’re trying to influence someone’s ability to speak their mind instead of their words. While it’s important that non-verbal communication isn’t used to manipulate others to say a word, when people are actively working out their needs for communication and using non
Different cultures also display of emotions differently. Some cultures get very emotional when they are debating an issue. They may yell, cry, or display anger, fear, frustration, and other feelings openly. Other cultures may try to keep their emotions hidden. Some cultures do not think it is appropriate to be open about emotions, the reasons behind a conflict, or personal information. As a professional, it is important to keep this in mind when engaged in a dialogue or when working with others. Professional