Cuban Missile Crisis AnalysisJoin now to read essay Cuban Missile Crisis AnalysisCuban Missile Crisis AnalysisThe Cuban Missile Crisis was one of the most important events in United States history; it’s even easy to say world history because of what some possible outcomes could have been from it. The Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962 was a major Cold War confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union. After the Bay of Pigs Invasion the USSR increased its support of Fidel Castros Cuban regime, and in the summer of 1962, Nikita Khrushchev secretly decided to install ballistic missiles in Cuba. President Kennedy and the other leaders of our country were faced with a horrible dilemma where a decision had to be made. Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara outlined three possible courses of action for the president:
Determination: to remove American power from the international system which was at the center of the Cuban Missile Crisis. As well to prevent the Cuban “interventionist and communist” regime from getting control of Cuba, a declaration of martial law. The Cuban Missile Crisis was the only time where Soviet Union was responsible for the Cuban Missile Crisis. At the time, the American people could have expected that the Soviet Union could do things like put a nuclear bomb on the island of Cuba, or stop its aggression, without nuclear weapons on the island. But no such plan came into existence. Nor the Cuban revolution was ever organized in a way that would allow for military confrontation with the USA. The Cuban Missile Crisis was the first major Cold War incident since 9/11, and it is quite different from the Cold War that has started.
Cuban Missile Crisis: How to react, what to do…
In 1953, the Cuban Government of a new political administration in Cuba declared martial law and was launched with a series of missiles, some of which attacked civilian citizens in Cuba. The U.S. military has since claimed responsibility for the events and continues to use Cuban ballistic missiles as a means to invade countries.
Sixty-three Cubans were killed in the attack and tens of thousands are estimated to have fled the island. However, the Cuban Government has been forced to explain that those who are still alive will be able to escape to Cuba.
The following information is provided via the U. S. Embassy to the United Nations (U.N.):
* The President of the United States, acting on instructions from his top American officials, issued a statement condemning the attacks by Cuban missile attack.
* President Barack Obama addressed the United Nations General Assembly
* Cuban leader Cuban Leader Fidel Castro described the events of that day as a historic moment in international relations
* The Cuban missile crisis is one of the most important military and diplomacy crises in U.S. foreign policy history
* I call on the Cuban government to immediately and forcefully remove any weapons that could threaten the interests of the United States or anyone else -including any foreign government that has nuclear weapons.
* The Cuban Missile Crisis is a devastating attack on the stability of the Caribbean.
* In recent years, the Cuban leader has repeatedly used nuclear weapons and launched missiles on US embassies, state departments and other international bodies. This attack is an attack on the United States as well as the entire world and poses a major military threat to our world position. It poses an existential threat for the United States.
* Since the election of John Kerry, Cuba has been attacked as well as attacked by other countries. Cuba has been attacked again and again in defense of its sovereignty, which was undermined by the US bombing of Cuba. Cuba has been attacked again and again in military and political conflict against the US of A; Russia and China (the United States of B; Russia and China).
* In fact, this war is the most expensive in history if one estimates U.S. and French forces combined to defend themselves against the very first Soviet invasion against the USA from 1952 through 1967.
* In the past, the United States and the rest of the capitalist world have repeatedly attacked Cuba from within.
“The political course of action” of openly approaching Castro, Khrushchev, and U.S. allies in a gambit to resolve the crisis diplomatically, an option that McNamara and others considered unlikely to succeed; “a course of action that would involve declaration of open surveillance” coupled with “a blockade against offensive weapons entering Cuba”; and “military action directed against Cuba, starting with an air attack against the missiles” (Chang, 2).
When U.S. reconnaissance flights revealed the clandestine construction of missile launching sites, President Kennedy publicly denounced (Oct. 22, 1962) the Soviet actions. The options of taking military action against Cuba and Russia luckily never took
place and President Kennedy chose to impose a naval blockade on Cuba and declared that any missile launched from Cuba would warrant a full-scale retaliatory attack by the United States against the Soviet Union. On Oct. 24, Russian ships carrying missiles to Cuba turned back, and when Khrushchev agreed (Oct. 28) to withdraw the missiles and dismantle the missile sites, the crisis ended as suddenly as it had begun. The United States ended its blockade on Nov. 20, and by the end of the year the missiles and bombers were removed from Cuba.
The chosen level of analysis and international relation theory to explain this event are the individual-level of analysis and realism. This level of analysis focuses on the individuals that make decisions, the impact of human nature, the behavior of individuals acting in an organization, and how personality and individual experiences impact foreign policy decisions. This level will show how all of these factors played a great role in the outcome of the Cuban Missile Crisis. The criteria that will be used to analyze this event are the Cuban citizens’ participation to rebel against their own in the Bay of Pigs Invasion, the toughness of the great leader John F. Kennedy and his Executive Committee of the National Security Council, the decision making in crisis by the U.S. leaders, and the crazy leaders that the United States was up against.
The criteria that will be used to analyze this event are the Cuban citizens’ participation to rebel against their own for the success of the Cuban Missile Crisis by the U.S. during WW I, and the toughness of President Kennedy and his Executive Committee of the National Security Council, the decision making to invade Mexico during WW II. The criteria that will be used to analyze this event are the Cuban citizens ’ involvement to rebel against their own to win the Cuban Missile Crisis, the intensity of international relations, the effectiveness of the Cuban government and the international community in dealing with this crisis, the importance and importance of the Cuban people for U.S. national security, the importance of the Cuban people to the future of a peaceful and democratic Cuba, and the importance of international relations in building a peaceful and democratic Cuba.
The criteria that will be used to analyze this event are the Cuban citizens’ involvement to rebel against their own to win the Cuban Missile Crisis, U.S. government involvement to force the U.S. on the island of Dominica during a missile attack from Cuba, and the intensity of international relations, the role of international relations in fighting the U.S. threat while trying to prevent the Cuban Missile Disaster, the use of torture during hostage situations, and the importance of international relations in protecting the Cuban people.
The criteria that will be used to analyze this event are the Cuban citizens’ involvement to rebel against their own to win the Cuban Missile Disaster during a missile attack from Cuba, and the intensity of diplomatic efforts to prevent Cuba from launching a military invasion in the Caribbean Sea or the military operation to repel the Cuban Missile Missile Disposal in South Texas.
The criteria that will be used to analyze this event are the Cuban citizens’ involvement to rebel against their own to win the Cuban Missile Disaster during a missile attack from Cuba, and the intensity of international relations, the importance of American efforts to prevent Cuba from becoming the last superpower in this hemisphere, the importance of diplomatic efforts to prevent international economic sanctions, and the importance of international relations in the fight against terrorism, including the importance of the American people to the future prospects of a peaceful Cuba.
The criteria that will be used to analyze this event are the Cuban citizens’ involvement to rebel against their own to win the Cuban Missile Disaster during a missile attack from Cuba, and the intensity of diplomatic efforts to prevent Cuba from launching a military invasion in the Bahamas. The criteria that will be used to analyze this event are the Cuban citizens’ involvement to rebel against their own to win the Cuban Missile Disaster during a missile attack from Cuba, the intensity of the U.S. government intervention during the Cuban Missile Crisis, the importance of American efforts to avoid U.S. involvement in the Cuban Missile crisis and the importance of international relations in building a peaceful and democratic Cuba.The criteria that will be used to analyze this event are the Cuban citizens’ involvement to rebel against their own to win the Cuban Missile Disaster during a missile attack from Cuba, the intensity of economic sanctions, the need for international help after the Cuban Missile Crisis to repair relations with Cuba, the importance of humanitarian relief and human rights in Cuba, and the importance of international relations in building a peaceful and democratic Cuba.The criteria that will be used to analyze this event are
Realism can be defined as an image of international relations that can be traced back two thousand years. Realists tend to hold pessimistic views on the likelihood of the transformation of the current world into a more peaceful one, emphasizing the struggle for power among political units each acting in a rational, unitary manner to advance its interests. Realists also tend to believe in stability, value order, and be conflictual. This criterion will hold strong in defining the United States international relations at the time of the Cuban Missile Crisis.
The first aspect of the individual-level analysis to be discussed is the Cuban rebels participation to train with the C.I.A. in a plan to attack and liberate Cuba from its communist government, known as the “Bay of Pigs Invasion”. Even though the attack failed, it still showed the realist point of view by the United States. The attack was in relation to the national interest and security the United States was trying to secure, and also showed the conflictual side of our government. The United States was against all communist parties in the world, and especially against Cuba since it’s right off the coast of Florida and is more of a threat then the communist countries in Europe and Asia. Therefore we used the Cuban rebels so it would seem as if they were just rebelling against their own country. The rebels agreeing to attack their own country showed that they also had a sense of national interest and valued a balance of power in Cuba. After this event Khrushchev, the Soviet leader said this: “As far as the Soviet Union is concerned, there should be no mistake about our position: We will render the Cuban people and their government all necessary help to repel an armed attack on Cuba.”(Sierra, 6)
The next aspect of the individual-level analysis to be discussed is the great leader John F. Kennedy and his Executive Committee of the National Security Council (ExComm). They showed the great aspects of realism with