Cja 394 – Global Crimes AnalysisGlobal Crimes AnalysisCriminal Justice/CJA394Global Crimes AnalysisThere are a quandary of criminal issues and global crimes which impact the international and national justice systems and processes. Often times the conception of the systems roles are misinterpreted by society; the perception suggests any criminal act worldwide has to be covered by the criminal justice system in the nation and resolve the issues. In this paper, I will identify various global crimes and criminal issues that have a global impact on national and international justice systems and processes. In my analysis, I will also compare and contrast the various international criminal justice systems and how these major global crimes and criminal issues could be addressed.
The various major global crimes and criminal issues that have a global impact on national and international justice systems and processesThe international justice system is subjugated from multiple nations which administer proper funding utilized to battle the large scale of criminal acts; and not minor criminal offenses, such as theft, robbery, or assault, but those of transnational crimes that affect humanity. If the international justice system did not exist, the nations would have grave difficulty in addressing and maintaining control over the waters, and skyway border patrols. Organized crime occurs across the world, and technology has enabled many of the groups to conduct their illegal acts by computer cyberspace, which limits investigative measures because they just click a button, and receive their products either on airplanes or boats smuggled into the United States.
It is implausible to effectively respond to the transnational drug smuggling operations when the nation who ascertains mandated responsibilities, does not support the enforcing methods (Muraskin, & Roberts, 2009). For instance, American eminence scrutinizes in following all policies and procedures as a preventative measure against allowing any importation of illegal drugs, weapons, humans, or terrorist attacks occur in the country, however, if neighboring nations like Columbia are not supporting the mandated laws, or enforcing them to battle against the crimes, then the United States efforts will not be accomplished, but rather failed. The same excogitates for other criminal acts of human and gun smuggling. There are more violations committed which are not mentioned, officers and political officials turning heads to allow the crimes, and without the presence of the international justice system, which correlates the openings in countries.
[Note: The purpose of this article is to make the point that the United States as a human society in its policy setting recognizes the right of drug smuggling through the borders, the role of law enforcement agencies and the international response to drug cartel activity of other countries in the same direction, that of the military with a unique role (see the article in this issue). The author further discusses the implications of this distinction. Also note the two types of immigration which the United States uses to fight other countries. While law enforcement, as both police and terrorists, need the intelligence in order to identify any criminal threat, when dealing with a drug smuggler you need the intelligence to know all the information such a criminal may have, as well as, if the organization he is smuggling from is on high alert. In this regard, the United States and other international partners are working together to ensure that only those who have strong law enforcement and intelligence needs are given permission to enter the country, and is working to prevent these from ever occurring again. It is common in our international system for members of our police and military to cooperate together, but in addition this will mean that even though our police and military are not trained to fight drug trafficking, we will not let drug traffickers in (e.g,.) the U.S., nor other countries who do not support our policy of enforcement. These two approaches are in contrast to human rights defenders’ efforts to identify the drug smugglers using the best technical intelligence available and that we work to promote the rights and the safety of all human beings.
[Note: For example, Human Rights Watch has documented and compiled a number of studies and conclusions where people on the ground and in the media have found that the use of medical marijuana has no benefits and may not improve the lives of people on the ground.]
[Note: One study in this issue by U.S.-based Human Rights Watch, found evidence that cannabis-oil has the potential to increase the risk of AIDS, hepatitis C, and other diseases through its use and its dependence. Also note on the subject of marijuana: In addition to the effects of marijuana on other health benefits, there is the potential for a potential increase in violence, which in part is due largely to the fact that more and more people are consuming marijuana for medical purposes due to this use. Marijuana could also be used to treat certain mental illnesses (e.g., PTSD), other mental disorders (e.g., bipolar disorder, etc.), or many types of mental illnesses (e.g., bipolar manic personality disorder, bipolar depression), all of which are not only legal but also can be considered medical. Furthermore, the United States and other countries currently allow illegal and controlled use of cannabis. One study, of 2,900 people from Colombia in 1998 who were given 1 gram of cannabis a day by U.S citizens and 2 gram from non-citizens, found that while they suffered from post-traumatic stress disorder, some patients said that they felt “more stable” than non-users due to these high THC levels. That study showed that U.S.-based research has indicated that users of cannabis who use non-legal use drugs should be monitored in particular and not allowed into their countries if the person has high THC levels. In 2009, United States Senator Bob Graham (R-FL) introduced legislation to improve the drug laws in South Florida. In his introduction to Graham, he mentioned that “we know that the U.S. Government is the source of nearly 30% of marijuana deaths in the world, which means that it is important that we see some kind of action to address this problem. I also believe that it would be sensible and necessary to make federal funding available to states to fight the growing issue of cannabis.” The senator also stated that “when you add people who are suffering from addiction, and even though their access