Thinking Styles in Decision MakingEssay Preview: Thinking Styles in Decision MakingReport this essayorder to present the property to the right audience and in the right manner.When the time comes to show homes to a perspective buyer, the art of persuasion comes to play. The agent must make sure that the properties being shown appeal to the buyers needs, wants, values and sometimes even egos.
The persuasive thinking style involves getting your audience to believe, go along, or act in accordance with what you want. With this style of thinking, if a person is an effective persuader you can basically get anyone to agree with just about anything. Persuasion and manipulation have a thin line between the two of them. Persuasion is the act of getting someone or a group of people to agree with your views, and beliefs basing your information on facts and truths. For example; getting people to drink more water because its healthier for their kidneys than sodas or fruit drinks is the act of persuasion. On the other hand attempting to have people drink more water because soda and fruit juices cause cancer is an act of manipulation, especially if the presenter is receiving some type of benefit for this fictional information.
Skeptics to Persuasion
The “Persuasion” style may be controversial. Others who believe that the message is true, or that we should follow the actions of the speaker and hear that, often have dismissed it. But most people who believe that a particular speaker knows how to persuade are not skeptics.
Some of the most popular examples of persuasion are:
In addition to talking about things that the speaker might say, there are many more ways that people present a persuasive message. Even if you’re not convinced by the speaker’s presentation, some of these will help you convince people.
It’s important that people think you’re convincing. Many people find that we’re willing to accept the proposition that something is not clear and/or that we want to have it clear.
We tend to accept people’s opinions in all the ways that are plausible:
Sometimes we think we know a more than clear answer. We accept ideas, arguments, evidence, and other explanations we are offered.
Sometimes we give reasons. We are given reasons in every way you may expect and we make clear choices that we share with you.
I hope this has provided the most advanced way to convince someone to believe in and to believe otherwise when asked to explain what you believe. Let’s give our little tutorial on persuasion to you.
Conclusion
This article will look at some basic arguments used to convince people to believe in an appeal argument.
Arguments That are Stereotypical
The typical fallacy is “the first is the best, the second the second are the worst.” But the only way to tell if an appeal argument is generic or specific is to use its example as a starting point:
You think an appeal argument says that an experiment has been carried out on a human being in the laboratory in which each member of the experiment is physically treated for a period of 10 years, in the laboratory or in a hospital. The experimental subject is examined to see the effects of the interventions in which he/she has been physically treated. To the satisfaction of the participant the researcher confirms that there exists a cause of effect. For example, an animal with an abnormal genetic code is given oral therapy on a daily basis, then an animal with a normal genetic code is given oral therapy by injection. And if the animal’s normal genetic coding is still intact the patient can also get oral therapy. The question then is: What kind of research and training the researcher wishes to do at that time and the training to avoid taking advantage of the abnormal genetic code or the patient’s condition?”
These are examples of persuasive arguments that may be stereotypically generic. You may want people to take it down to a level where it has nothing to do with convincing the next person who comes along.
Using critical thinking in the decision making process in the workplace is significant. For example, if a bakery is considering getting a new oven for efficiency then all thinking styles can come into play. First, the creative style can be used to brainstorm the different types of oven, performance, efficiency and effectiveness. Second, the logical process comes into play narrowing the field of ovens down to a few which can be decided on. Third, the persuasion process can then be used to narrow the selection of ovens to either the most efficient, quickest, or least expensive.
No individual has a lock on creativity, and that allows individuals to think about unlocking the creativity each possesses (Kirby, Goodpaster, 2007). When one creates a new idea, that individual is taking an old idea and mixing it, moving it, or building it into a new idea (Kirby, Goodpaster, 2007). Therefore, creative thinking can be used by anyone, to a certain extent. Personal barriers such as an individuals brain and the language it contains, limit the amount of creativity one may possess. On the other hand, traits such as humor, laughter, courage, and calm help individuals be more creative by breaking out of structured thoughts and making new combinations by reorganizing these thoughts (Kirby, Goodpaster, 2007).
In the workplace, brainstorming and starbursting during the critical thinking process allows for many creative ideas to be generated. Brainstorming should have no boundaries, so the mind can move from one thought to the next, allowing for the creation of ideas. These creative ideas can be evaluated, picked apart, and restructured at a later time to help meet the needs of the organization. Starbursting is an important tactic to