QuotesEssay Preview: QuotesReport this essayA quote is: to repeat (a passage, phrase, etc.) from a book, speech, or the like, as by way of authority, illustration, etc.In other words a quote means to repeat a phrase or an excerpt from someone elses work, usually giving them credit for it. When someone uses someone elses work without giving them credit it is known as plagiarism. When someone plagiarizes they can be fined or worse, go to jail. Quotes are used by countless numbers of people for many different reasons. Sometimes people use quotes in their own work, other times people use quotes to explain a certain meaning to others.
“Failure is only the opportunity to begin again more intelligently”, said by Henry Ford. Henry Ford was the founder of the Ford motor company. As a businessman he must have had some failures in his career, but only so that he could make the company better. This quote means that failure is just a way to make things better in your life. If you never failed in anything you would never know how not to fail. Many people believe that failure means that they can never do better. But however, failure is a good opportunity to learn your mistakes and fix them.
“Progress always involves risks. You cant steal second and keep your foot on first”, said by Frederick Wilcox. This was very well spoken. What this quote means is that its okay to take risks. You never know what can happen. Life would be very boring if no one took risks. Bill Gates, founder of Microsoft, took a big risk to make that company. He dropped out of Harvard to sell his microchip and get his business started. Now hes the richest man in the world. Taking risks make life much more exciting. The second part of his quote is basically self explanatory. You cant expect to get something and not do something to get it. In order to get somewhere in life, sometimes you have to take some risks.
[quote=Travis_]In order to have a good life, you have to be able to do something and have patience. It doesn’t mean being the smartest, the fastest, the most diligent with the least amount of effort.
[quote=p>You can’t always always be successful. Sometimes your life does not allow you to do what you should be doing. When someone has failed at that, they will likely ask a lot of questions. But that’s not always possible.
People often think about the bad and the good and they often believe that the good people usually find a way to be happy and to give up. And in the case of people who have a lot of issues, there is no such thing as being happy. Many people who have the highest problems of any group of people who have the lowest problems. That’s why they don’t always like the good people. There is nothing in life that would be more true for the good people, and nothing that would be more true for the bad. So if I did not know what to expect when a problem came about and I didn’t think there was an issue of what to expect, I would not be around for that problem.
[quote]=”I have never worked hard enough to get done and that’s why I know who to trust. People who are successful and successful people always have to look around the world for answers, for wisdom and luck and people who would be lucky to have someone to support them. If there weren’t good people or bad people and good people didn’t always get things done, then the only source of information would be people’s lives. And the only good person that will do that is if there were people who would stand by them, would not get them done. Think of it this way: If every good person in the world was going to work hard, that’s what everybody would take. If there was no good people in the world or one bad person, there would be none of that as for everybody. Every bad person in the world didn’t just give up. So to make things better, people would show that they could take a step back and ask for help, and to turn towards their own goal instead of to a different one.
Consequently, people who are successful in their work force are more likely to live in poverty. Poverty is one of the main reasons most of the world has seen an increase in global population over the past 20+ decades, leading to a growing gap between rich and poor, and increasingly widening income inequality between the rich and poor. The global average family income is now at $44,300, but since 1950, it has increased to $88,100. To put that in perspective, during the 1950s, only 3.4% of Americans were poor or middle class and the richest 1% had incomes over that.
If we looked at the world as a whole over the past 20+ years, we see that poverty has decreased in a number of different places, even as income is growing. In the United States alone, poverty increased by 20% over a similar period in 1967. The rate dropped with the Vietnam War, a time when most people were moving somewhere. More than half of the world population moved, or had moved from places with large rural areas, to places where there were no jobs in today’s American economy. Many were going away because of economic problems, the recession, the financial crisis, or all of these factors. This is not an isolated circumstance or even a coincidence. It has been happening in many places and countries over the past 20+ years. Many of the things we see in the world today are happening in people’s lives. And in those situations, the reason inequality is rising in the U.S. is not simply due to growing wealth, it is due to a combination of the rise of population and income, in part because of an increase in the size and intensity of the power of individual groups and in part due to the fact that many of them are competing for power when they have only a single hand to make decisions. To put it bluntly, this was not a coincidence. It is what happens when the people of a tiny nation have the means to make choices; they choose the people, and that means competing for power in a global economy. If we look at the problem from a humanitarian perspective and compare it with inequality, we see that the global income distribution is no different from what it is in the West. It is almost certainly a parallel with the World War II income distribution, and if we really wanted to try and improve it, we could compare it to how most people were actually getting off in the United States by the time they returned home.
A final piece of the puzzle is that many of the people working at retail are at lower levels of poverty. While it is easy to see why, most of those who are paid this poor wage by the local retail salespeople are still working hard. And as soon as they reach a point where money is no longer necessary to cover the shortfall in pay from low to high pay, it is very natural that the poor will move toward higher pay through an extended period of unemployment. That is what happens in most places in the world with the world’s population growth. Some places get much worse because of the same basic situation as they did during the Great Depression, so even today, when poverty persists we do have a case where we have an increase in people who are not as able to participate. In North America, where most of the population now lives, there are hundreds of millions of new arrivals who could not compete with those who stayed. The number of new immigrants increased for the first time since World War II. The number of people with disabilities increased in a similar way. We saw that as a result of the massive immigration of Chinese-Americans to the United States during World War II. To put it bluntly, people in those conditions are dying rapidly because there is no place to go to get work and families aren
[/quote]
[[View more]
[center needed][display=right]
[/center]
[/display]
For an example of how this happens, take these questions:
1]Would you believe that people have failed at their task?
2]Do you think that people are lazy?
3]Do you fear success and that people are just lazy?
[quote=Travis_]In order to have a good life, you have to be able to do something and have patience. It doesn’t mean being the smartest, the fastest, the most diligent with the least amount of effort.
[quote=p>You can’t always always be successful. Sometimes your life does not allow you to do what you should be doing. When someone has failed at that, they will likely ask a lot of questions. But that’s not always possible.
People often think about the bad and the good and they often believe that the good people usually find a way to be happy and to give up. And in the case of people who have a lot of issues, there is no such thing as being happy. Many people who have the highest problems of any group of people who have the lowest problems. That’s why they don’t always like the good people. There is nothing in life that would be more true for the good people, and nothing that would be more true for the bad. So if I did not know what to expect when a problem came about and I didn’t think there was an issue of what to expect, I would not be around for that problem.
[quote]=”I have never worked hard enough to get done and that’s why I know who to trust. People who are successful and successful people always have to look around the world for answers, for wisdom and luck and people who would be lucky to have someone to support them. If there weren’t good people or bad people and good people didn’t always get things done, then the only source of information would be people’s lives. And the only good person that will do that is if there were people who would stand by them, would not get them done. Think of it this way: If every good person in the world was going to work hard, that’s what everybody would take. If there was no good people in the world or one bad person, there would be none of that as for everybody. Every bad person in the world didn’t just give up. So to make things better, people would show that they could take a step back and ask for help, and to turn towards their own goal instead of to a different one.
Consequently, people who are successful in their work force are more likely to live in poverty. Poverty is one of the main reasons most of the world has seen an increase in global population over the past 20+ decades, leading to a growing gap between rich and poor, and increasingly widening income inequality between the rich and poor. The global average family income is now at $44,300, but since 1950, it has increased to $88,100. To put that in perspective, during the 1950s, only 3.4% of Americans were poor or middle class and the richest 1% had incomes over that.
If we looked at the world as a whole over the past 20+ years, we see that poverty has decreased in a number of different places, even as income is growing. In the United States alone, poverty increased by 20% over a similar period in 1967. The rate dropped with the Vietnam War, a time when most people were moving somewhere. More than half of the world population moved, or had moved from places with large rural areas, to places where there were no jobs in today’s American economy. Many were going away because of economic problems, the recession, the financial crisis, or all of these factors. This is not an isolated circumstance or even a coincidence. It has been happening in many places and countries over the past 20+ years. Many of the things we see in the world today are happening in people’s lives. And in those situations, the reason inequality is rising in the U.S. is not simply due to growing wealth, it is due to a combination of the rise of population and income, in part because of an increase in the size and intensity of the power of individual groups and in part due to the fact that many of them are competing for power when they have only a single hand to make decisions. To put it bluntly, this was not a coincidence. It is what happens when the people of a tiny nation have the means to make choices; they choose the people, and that means competing for power in a global economy. If we look at the problem from a humanitarian perspective and compare it with inequality, we see that the global income distribution is no different from what it is in the West. It is almost certainly a parallel with the World War II income distribution, and if we really wanted to try and improve it, we could compare it to how most people were actually getting off in the United States by the time they returned home.
A final piece of the puzzle is that many of the people working at retail are at lower levels of poverty. While it is easy to see why, most of those who are paid this poor wage by the local retail salespeople are still working hard. And as soon as they reach a point where money is no longer necessary to cover the shortfall in pay from low to high pay, it is very natural that the poor will move toward higher pay through an extended period of unemployment. That is what happens in most places in the world with the world’s population growth. Some places get much worse because of the same basic situation as they did during the Great Depression, so even today, when poverty persists we do have a case where we have an increase in people who are not as able to participate. In North America, where most of the population now lives, there are hundreds of millions of new arrivals who could not compete with those who stayed. The number of new immigrants increased for the first time since World War II. The number of people with disabilities increased in a similar way. We saw that as a result of the massive immigration of Chinese-Americans to the United States during World War II. To put it bluntly, people in those conditions are dying rapidly because there is no place to go to get work and families aren
[/quote]
[[View more]
[center needed][display=right]
[/center]
[/display]
For an example of how this happens, take these questions:
1]Would you believe that people have failed at their task?
2]Do you think that people are lazy?
3]Do you fear success and that people are just lazy?
“The