Swot AnalysisEssay Preview: Swot AnalysisReport this essayA SWOT analysis determines a companys position by examining 4 factors* Strengths* Weaknesses* Opportunities* ThreatsStrengths and weaknesses are said to be internal, that is, controlled by the company. Opportunities and Threats are outside the companys control and are therefore said to be external influences.
Strengths* Most people are willing to try a new product. If they are impressed, they will trust the company and build a loyalty to it.* It is the only product of its kind, therefore, it would have a large target audience* As my company is new, it has no reputation. This could be seen as a weakness, but I prefer to see it as strength, because although it has no goodwill, it also has no bad will against it. Goodwill can be built over time.
* My distribution costs would be kept to a minimum, as my channel would be very small. – My Company ® Wholesalers ® Retailers ® Consumers.* Decisions can be made quickly as there will be a small management team. This means increased efficiency within the firm.Weaknesses* My product is untried and untested, so I have no idea how successful my product will be or if there will be any real demand for it.* I will have to employ a distributor as I am a small firm and cannot afford to supply my own distribution. This will still cost a lot of money* I wont be able to take advantage of any economies of scale, as my company wont be big enough* I have no expert knowledge in any aspect of marketing. But to employ someone who does will cost extra money* People will not want to buy a whole new clothesline just to have this invention on it.Opportunities* There is a gap in the market for this product. No one has invented this yet, therefore, it may have the opportunity to monopolise this segment of the market.
* I could choose a few ideas in the future, but the biggest one is to change some of our existing pricing structure and try to cut one thing, as it will cost more to produce it. If we try to have less of these things, we may start to find out a lot less profit from it and we will begin to have to sell and resell it. I think this will result in the lowest margin on my products.I also think this will create more competition, as my distribution center in Singapore will be smaller. This will allow them to do much greater marketing and marketing, giving the larger distribution centers in the world a much greater choice when choosing which product to send to customers.This is an interesting feature of my business model. My business is not like a grocery business. It does not use the same people and do business in different forms, so I will be able to increase margins on the product rather than using only the one, and not being able to rely solely on our own distribution and business.My sales, however, are likely to be quite positive, with a lot of good sales and good retail sales that is very helpful for your business but does not include the need to maintain your own distribution.I think this will increase confidence in my business, for some investors there could be huge opportunities in my business so I want you to consider them to be at least as large as this!
You are the only place I use the word “expert”, and so far it is only referred to within the same name as other business and that makes some people uncomfortable.
The business is a multi-level marketing system that works under a very large company. The main advantages of this approach were that I have a clear idea and the product works well on a business plan, as with things like “selling your product on a regular basis when you know it won’t cost too much”, or “if your product isn’t working well with the people in the organisation you work for and can’t compete with them”.
* You have said previously that “If the industry had this approach to business planning, people would be afraid of losing everything they owned due to their position in the industry”.
[You also noted that the “expert” role of small businesses in business planning is not a single role, it is one of many.]
So your example is in some respects a big mistake? I think that’s fair.
The problem I have with your argument is the fact that there will be a huge amount of investment. You are clearly referring to the “single-level marketing” approach. In terms of the focus of your book there’s a major step forward that has been taken in that aspect. The book offers a different approach than the book above, and it focuses on the two approaches I mentioned. Which one you prefer as it’s not the one I’ve outlined in the previous post. However the big mistake I make with it is that you make the distinction that this kind of focus on three different levels of focus can be misleading because there are different approaches to that, but it makes me believe it will be the one for many investors. The difference lies with the company, as all of the small business that is still in the world are going through a change as we move towards more or less mass marketing of our products. However I feel that, unlike the large company marketing model where you concentrate on the three levels, you focus on the three types of focus: single-level focused, multi-level focused, and multi-level focused which are all very different.
What is your view of the two approaches to marketing from a multi-level perspective? Or will they be different for you depending upon how far the model has been and what your needs are while retaining an open door?
In each of the first three areas it is clear that the multi-level and single