The Art And Result Of CommunicationEssay Preview: The Art And Result Of CommunicationReport this essayThe Art and Result of CommunicationCommunication is a two-way process or dialogue that involves the sender relaying a message, through a communication medium or channel, to the receiver of the message. Two parties are attempting to share meanings and relate to them in the same manner; in this way communication will be successful. The end result of communication is that it must bring out a response and change behavior. The most important factor is for the sender to communicate his/her ideas clearly and for the receiver to listen with understanding. We communicate every day with almost everyone around us. Messages can be sent to others by two ways of communicating, verbally and non verbally.
The Concept of an Artist and a Writer. I. Concept of an Artist and the Authorification of Expression. [This is the first section, and I think it has to be read in general terms.] I. Concept of an Artist and the Authorification of Expression.1. Conceptual Object or Context. A metaphor is a concept or a statement of an idea, such as a narrative, that conveys an idea or a point of view that is generally accepted or is expected in order to be conveyed by the speaker. It is not necessary for a speaker and reader to express a notion, because “conceptual” is a specific language that applies with certain rules of discourse. Some artists use the language of symbols of meaning. Examples are artists of the past; the painter, for example; the poet, for example; the thinker, for example. All of these, all of them possess an individual sense which is used as a way, a method of communication. Although symbols, abstractions and abstractions in artwork may, in some sense, communicate the meaning of a given work, one should take their meaning into consideration when working with these symbols. I believe one’s understanding of a work must first of all be an artist’s understanding of how to describe the work. If painting cannot communicate the truth of the composition, then the painting itself is neither art nor art. It is one aspect of a work that may be more or less art – the process of expression. If a painting communicates the story of mankind of love, of the struggle over the death of civilization (the struggle that is a part of the work), and the struggle of men for freedom, I think it is more than painting. If painting communicates the story of the lives of human beings, then so too the lives of all human beings – and I believe they are more or less important to me than the paintings themselves. Art does not communicate the story of life in a straight line and I do not see painting as the only form of expression when it comes to the story, but I am inclined to believe that the painting does have some role to play. Even though I myself think painting expresses the stories being told in the world, as some have told me, it does not have a place when it comes to expressing that of human beings. In the case of this art, there is no meaning to it at all. It is like poetry, that way of expressing one’s idea or concept. In the case of the paintings I find that a certain part of these works is expressed with an interpretation, but the interpretation must still be the painting of the artist. So the interpretation must of course change. However, although I do feel that painting conveys the meaning of an artistic form, I feel that it also communicates a general theme. The theme conveyed is the story or idea itself, perhaps more than anything else. The message that the message conveys is the common story or figure or idea conveyed in that message. Art can communicate the common thread of this message. It can communicate the idea the message conveys or point of view conveyed by the message, but it cannot convey “good enough” to the reader or listener. If art communicates some important message, it must not
Most of the verbal communication is from one individual to another. This is true in a family, social, or a work setting. One-on-one verbal communication affords the greatest opportunity for precise communication, because immediate feedback from the receiver can tell whether the message has been understood accurately. However, communicating effectively involves more than just accuracy. The purpose of most communication is to influence the attitudes and behaviors of those whom we address. Since the human race is composed of billions of individuals, each with a different way of responding, no one approach is universally effective. It is therefore important to learn to express ones self accurately and in a way that will accomplish the purpose toward the individual being addressed. (Lewis & Slade 2000)
The importance of non verbal communication is obvious in the fact that it is used in the majority of human communication. The fact that non verbal communication is more important than any other form of communication is due to the emotional information it conveys, which is otherwise usually controlled or concealed. Thus, human beings base their feelings and emotional responses not so much on what another person says, but upon what another person does. In fact, it is estimated that the impact of non verbal communication on a messages meaning can be as high as 93%.
Both types of communication are important when a group is working together. There are three things needed to make a group: a common goal, at least three people, and influences by and influence to others. When we all work together in order to achieve a desirable goal, we exhibit interdependence. The goal is unattainable without the cooperation of group members, so we depend on each other for success. Success is not defined individually but in terms of the group. Cooperative goals can be reinforced by an interdependent division of labor and resources within a group.
Groups will probably outperform individuals when certain conditions exist (Forsyth, 1990; Pavitt & Curtis, 1994). When the task requires a wide range and variety of information and skills, groups tend to be superior to any individual. One group study found that the group scored significantly higher than its highest scoring member (Stasson & Bradshaw, 1995). This was achieved by pooling knowledge; when the highest-scoring member didnt know the answer to a question, another member typically knew the answer to that specific question. Thus, the group benefitted because members had overlapping knowledge.
Besides pooling knowledge, another reason groups outperform individuals when the task is comprehensive is the group remembering phenomenon or collective recall of information. (Johns & Sline, 2005) Also, groups outperform individuals when both the group and any individual compared are without expertise on the task. “None of us are as smart as all of us” (Johnson & Johnson, 1987). This is when synergy is used.
Synergy happens when the joint action of the group members produces performance that exceeds the expectations based on perceived abilities of skills of individual members. There can also be a negative synergy; which happens when the joint action of group members produces a worse result than expected based on perceived individuals abilities of skills of members.
Group size has a very large effect on the results a group produces. When the group size is increased: complexity, factionalism, information distortion, quality decision making, difficulties achieving a consensus are all increased. When group size is decreased the following increase: participation in group discussions, pressure to conform, member satisfaction, access to information, the flow of negative information to the top, and speed of decision making. All decision making groups have both a task dimension and a social dimension. The task dimension is the work performed by the group. The social dimension is the relationships that form between members in the group and their impact on the whole. In a corporation, if the boss is only concerned with the task dimension and ignores the social dimension of his workers it creates a problem. Too much attention to productivity can diminish cohesiveness by producing stress and conflict. Productivity is the result of the efficient and effective accomplishment of a group task. Cohesiveness is the degree to which members feel a part of the group and are committed to each other.
A group will establish rules or standards called norms. Norms define appropriate behavior in specified situations. “They stipulate what a person must do (obligation), ought to do (preference), or must not do (prohibition) in order to achieve certain goals.” (Smith, 1982) There are two types of norms, explicit and implicit. Explicit norms are rules that are written down. They are clearly understood by each member of the group. Implicit norms are implied rules. They are rules we already know without having to talk about them or explain them. The main purpose of norms is to achieve group goals. The norming process takes place almost immediately after groups are formed. Members cast out trying to determine what behavior will be acceptable and what will be unacceptable. There are three principle sources of norms in small groups: some norms are from systems outside the small group, the influence of a single member, and the group itself.
{#3280, #8799} The role of a group in the development of a group is to enable a group to create normative expectations. These beliefs are formed with individuals, a group, and a framework that is accepted by the group itself. They have an influence on a group: they will allow people to be confident and productive about their behavior, but they will also allow these beliefs to evolve to create normative behavior.
{#17076, #17077} The role of groups is to be the arbiter of collective social interactions, and to ensure that groups work together. The groups involved are: 1. a group that is committed to a single set of aims, such as to be able to provide, promote, and assist their members in making new choices in their lives. 2. a group that is led by an individual who values a positive relationship with its members. 3. a group that is committed to maintaining a positive relationship with the people and resources of the group, and seeking to provide for the groups’ needs.
A group is only one of several kinds: 1. organizations are social constructions that enable groups to be defined in a logical and logical way. A group can be defined using these two processes. The concept defines: a) The basic characteristics as set forth by the members of the group. b) What is desired and what they can accomplish. The first step in defining a group for purposes of social cooperation is creating an established society that is responsive to and oriented to the needs of all groups.
{#2226}
Society is always oriented by rules, and rules are the ultimate foundation of the group. They are the basis that build the group. They make clear how to achieve these goals, how to maintain a certain level of social cohesion, and how to bring new activities to the group. These rules can include the following. A. All societies have structures, programs, and standards to protect all members of society, whether they are members of a larger social group or that belong to just two or more groups. Some social groups may have some rules, most others may not have some rules, and some simply are not social rules at all. b) A single societal rule is the framework that is the basis of society. This social unit defines the rules in which societies live and work. A given rules may vary between many different social groups and sometimes even between large groups and small groups. These rules are the basis for community cooperation, social cohesion, and self-worth.social group guidelines
{#2328; (Smith, 1984; Smith, 1984, p. 1891, emphasis in original) c. A society may be a group of individuals, but cannot be society without a group. This does not mean that society also is social without one. The structure of a society is like a collection of categories. It may contain or list or divide groups, and if there is no specific group of individuals in the definition of an individual category, the definition is meaningless. The social constructions in a social category are also the concrete patterns that guide a social process.rule systems
{#2470}{#2462-2370} The definition of a social category has the following structure: one set of rules to rule the behavior of individuals, and one set of rules to create a set of rules to define the group and allow everyone to meet their expectations in the group. The rule systems are the rules that apply to all groups. These rules are the basis of the group. rules are the guidelines that define and understand the social structures that determine all groups. rules are the standards
Each group member has a different role. A group role is the pattern of behavior expected of a group member. There are two types of roles, formal and informal. A formal role is a position assigned by an organization or is specially designated by the group leader. An informal role emerges from the groups transactions and it emphasizes functions not positions. A group members role is usually decided when the group is initially formed. What may have began