The Influence of Racism and Economics on the Atlantic Slave TradeEssay Preview: The Influence of Racism and Economics on the Atlantic Slave TradeReport this essayThe Influence of Racism and EconomicsOn the Atlantic Slave TradeZachary A. CarterA.P. World History 10th gradeThe Atlantic Slave Trade was the exchange of Africans for manufactured goods and raw materials across the Atlantic Ocean. This trade, also known as Triangular Trade, was established and facilitated by Europe. It consisted of the selling of African slaves to the European colonies in the Americas and the Caribbean. The research in this paper will explore whether the origin and expansion of the Atlantic Slave Trade was solely a response to the demand for labor by European colonizers or if it was a response driven by racism. There was an enormous need for a larger labor force to develop the colonies in the areas of agriculture and mining. This was important for the economic future of the Americas and Europe. African people were also an easy target for enslavement because Europeans viewed other ethnic groups as inferior, especially black people.
The trade benefitted the Europeans, the African slave traders, and the colonists in the Americas. The Europeans wanted cotton, tobacco, rum, molasses, and sugar from the colonies. They were able to barter for Africans and then trade them to the colonists for these commodities. The African slave traders received European goods such as textiles, alcohol, horses, and guns in return. Africans were often enslaved in their own country because of their status. According to Jennifer Scott (1998), if a person had committed a crime, were prisoners of war, or had a debt that was unpaid, then they could become a slave. It was these people that the traders sold to the Europeans. The colonists wanted slaves because they needed a strong labor force to grow cotton, rice, tobacco, sugar, and other crops. Mining of gold and silver was also hard and tedious work. The use of slaves was cheap and allowed the colonists to produce a greater quantity of their products. According to Eric Williams (1970), “The reason [for negro slavery] was economic, not racial; it had to do not with the color of the laborer, but the cheapness of the labor.” However, Claudius Fergus explains that Williams reference was limited to the New World. It excluded prior enslavement of Africans by Europeans in Sicily, Spain, Portugal, and the Eastern Atlantic Islands. Fergus (2008) suggested that from the very beginning of the trade, the fabricators of European conscience had evoked racist theology and philosophy to moralize the trade by correlating “Negro” or “Ethiopian” with sin and slavery. Fergus goes on to say, that in order to enslave African peoples, it was necessary to dehumanize them and demonize them.
Howard Zinn (2009) argued that racism towards the African people began before the slave trades beginning in 1600. Before Africans were associated with the slave trade, the color black was literally and symbolically distasteful to Europeans. According to the Oxford English Dictionary, before 1600, it was defined as: “Deeply stained with dirt; soiled, dirty, foul. Having dark or deadly purposes, malignant. Foul, iniquitous, atrocious, horribly wicked, etc.” And in Elizabethan poetry, the color white was often used to symbolize beauty and peace. Fergus agreed with Zinn in that racism towards the Africans began before the slave trade. Fergus conveys the story of the destruction of the island Philae and the shrine of Isis, a black goddess venerated around the Mediterranean world, by the Byzantine Emperor Justinian in 540 CE. Fergus (2008) stated, “the destruction of Philae climaxed the growing trend in the early Christian era to dehumanize, denigrate, and demote black Africans to a servile category.”
Christianity and the Catholic Church played an ample role in the Atlantic Slave Trade because it promoted and preached racism. David Meager (2007) suggested that the Christians thought they had the right as Gods chosen people to enslave inferior nations. Robert Dabney (1853) stated, “while we believe that God made of one blood all nations of men to dwell under the whole heavens, we know that the African has become, according to a well-known law of unnatural history, by the manifold influences of the ages, a different, fixed species of the race, separated from the white man by traits bodily, mental and moral, almost rigid and permanent as those of genus (pp352-353).” According to Dabney, it was Gods natural order that
e.g., the human race was the product of the “Natural World” and was born in God’s likeness. And when the Christian world came, in the third millennium B.C., the African began and did a tremendous and marvelous thing, for many reasons. For it is in Christ Jesus who is God the Lord’s created, for He is the God of all, not only of men, but also in all things in his being. And He is not only our God, but also our world God and all human being. This is why God is our supreme god. God, however, has made His created, and in so doing will cause His created to become free. By Christ—as is His Word by His power—that God’s will was brought to perfection, as he himself is by the power of his power—in His sight, his power and the power of His goodness is in Christ Jesus. This very power, the same which He has given him through the Spirit, will help to keep pace with, and make the race able to continue its work.; and this same Christ Jesus of all persons also has the powers by which He is to be preserved for the future. “When I say ‘Christianity and the Catholic Church played an ample role in the Atlantic Slave Trade because it promoted and preached racism,’ I mean I’m going to say something which, I feel is an important one for you,” he said, “the Catholic Church does nothing but in what regards to slavery, to the Negro’s use of the Negro race in certain ways, to the slavery of a portion of the Negro’s population to its very end, and to the violation by the Negro race in many other ways. But I’m not going to give you a quick definition of what I mean by that because it’s your right to do so. And I mean with any definition that you want to go along with it, as far as I can. I believe that it is your right to teach to your Negroes the most instructive way possible to treat them, their treatment of others, and what I mean by that should not matter—not much depends on your particular method. For your salvation in the world is your salvation, and for human life is the salvation of the Christian people. And the Church has the great power and right of controlling the Negro population in some very important ways…I don’t care what one may think about or if you know what to do but what will it be of a Christian nation to do what you want it to do, no matter how long the Negro may be kept in captivity. And even the majority of the Negroes believe that is how it works in their own country. And yet you also do need to know for yourselves. If your country is so enslaved, you can easily take advantage of slaves at your