DiscriminationEssay Preview: DiscriminationReport this essayRace is generally defined as a persons ancestry or ethnic characteristics. Everyone is some race or color. It is illegal to discriminate against anyone, if the basis is their race or color. But discrimination still plays a major part in our so called free society. Nationality, color of skin and language barriers can still hinder certain people from getting jobs, living in the places they want, and even eating in some restaurants.
We all know what it is. Some try to pretend that it doesnt exist. Some try to look the other way, some just agree with it, but discrimination never goes away. Its like a bad habit. In the foreseeable future, I dont see discrimination going away. Weve made laws to try to correct things only to offend others.
A case was brought against NYPD in 1999, arguing that officers from all minorities faced discrimination in their jobs. A class-action lawsuit was filed that alleged the NYPD discriminated against minority officers in its hiring and employment practices. The lawsuit alleged that Latino and African-American officers were subject to different disciplinary treatment, a “hostile work environment” and retaliation. African-American and Latino officers have also alleged that they are regularly sent on the most dangerous assignments in the city. Also a Sikh officer claimed religious discrimination against the New York police. After four years of negotiations, a federal judge approved settlement. Under the settlement, 1,199 Latino and African-American officers who filed discrimination claims became eligible for compensation from the $27 million settlement amount. The citys police department also agreed to make a series of internal changes to its operations.
A lawsuit was brought against NYPD in 1999, arguing that officers from all minorities faced discrimination in their jobs. A class-action lawsuit was filed that alleged the NYPD discriminated against minority officers in its hiring and employment practices. The lawsuit alleged that Latino and African-American officers were subject to different disciplinary treatment, a “hostile work environment” and retaliation. African-American and Latino officers have also alleged that they are regularly sent on the most dangerous assignments in the city. Also a Sikhs officer claimed religious discrimination against the New York police. After four years of negotiations, a federal judge approved settlement. In November 2000, the city of New York City adopted a change in its law that removed all the protections of the Human Rights Act that make it unlawful for law enforcement to discriminate against a racial group. The city also changed its policies to avoid racial profiling and other racial profiling.
On September 30, 1999, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed the trial court’s conviction of officer Andrew Tzepkowsky. The district court upheld their right to a speedy trial in an Eastern District Court case.
In May 2002, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on appeal held that NewYork. com, not NYPD , discriminated against minority employees at the office of one of its police chiefs. During the past 40 years that the NYPD have faced discrimination lawsuit, the NYPD received an average annual salary of $13,500, nearly $9 million a year in benefits. Over 70% of the employees who worked at the NYPD had disabilities that made them ineligible for unemployment pay, according to the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office. The New York City Police Department has not yet filed an enforcement complaint against Tzepkowsky, so the city’s civil rights litigation is ongoing.
On December 4, 2013, the New York Civil Liberties Union of New York filed suit against NYPD, alleging that the chief and his chief of staff violate the Equal Protection Clause of the First Amendment by taking control of employees’ employment decisions.
As soon as the Brooklyn District Attorney’s office filed its Civil Rights Complaint against the Chief in December, 2013, no further action was taken.
Prior to the trial judge’s decision, the New York Times reported that “police officials have been forced under increasing pressure to address and address problems with minorities that have been long stifled by police efforts to combat discrimination.”
New York state is the second largest Asian-American jurisdiction in the United States, responsible solely for enforcing the Fourth Amendment rights of all residents.
In addition to the city and city of Los Angeles, which are the two largest metropolitan areas in the United States, Los Angeles has also had a number of Latino-American mayors and mayorships, as well as its own police force with over a dozen Latino and African-American mayor-appointed as well as independent police commissioners.
Among the police chief’s positions in the City of Los Angeles are the chief of police, lieutenant commissioner of the LAPD, the chief of detectives, and the vice mayor of the city’s major agencies, according to his employment and career record page on the LAPD. His position at both LAPD and LAPD includes a full-time salary from the city as well as a salary on the city’s pay and benefits structure.
In August 2012, an investigation by the Times concluded that LAPD and city officials could not meet or deal with a “substantial minority” of employees because they did not meet criteria for full-time status for police officers. The Times reported that the findings “demonstrated an unacceptable level of lack of institutional trust and fairness in Los Angeles, a city without even one black officer in any of its seven departments.”
Additionally, on Tuesday, December 7, 2012, a District Court judge decided to reinstate the city of L.A.’s Department of Police as a result of the results of a
A lawsuit was brought against NYPD in 1999, arguing that officers from all minorities faced discrimination in their jobs. A class-action lawsuit was filed that alleged the NYPD discriminated against minority officers in its hiring and employment practices. The lawsuit alleged that Latino and African-American officers were subject to different disciplinary treatment, a “hostile work environment” and retaliation. African-American and Latino officers have also alleged that they are regularly sent on the most dangerous assignments in the city. Also a Sikhs officer claimed religious discrimination against the New York police. After four years of negotiations, a federal judge approved settlement. In November 2000, the city of New York City adopted a change in its law that removed all the protections of the Human Rights Act that make it unlawful for law enforcement to discriminate against a racial group. The city also changed its policies to avoid racial profiling and other racial profiling.
On September 30, 1999, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit affirmed the trial court’s conviction of officer Andrew Tzepkowsky. The district court upheld their right to a speedy trial in an Eastern District Court case.
In May 2002, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on appeal held that NewYork. com, not NYPD , discriminated against minority employees at the office of one of its police chiefs. During the past 40 years that the NYPD have faced discrimination lawsuit, the NYPD received an average annual salary of $13,500, nearly $9 million a year in benefits. Over 70% of the employees who worked at the NYPD had disabilities that made them ineligible for unemployment pay, according to the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office. The New York City Police Department has not yet filed an enforcement complaint against Tzepkowsky, so the city’s civil rights litigation is ongoing.
The NYPD is the largest police force in the country, employing more than 2,800 police officers. Approximately two percent of the workforce is African-American. When police officers are denied benefits, they make about $1 million a year in less than 30 days. For people of color this compensation could be nearly $3 million a year. On the other hand, one-third of those paid for their pension benefits are white. The New York City Police Department has seen its pay fall during this period, dropping over $100 million from its base budget last year to less than $75. This is $14 billion more in an already large budget for 2017 than it was in 2004. According to Tzepkowsky, this is particularly unfortunate since the New York City government provides a huge share of the benefits to its most vulnerable members– those without disabilities. This is not a problem that they simply need to address soon. The NYPD’s new, more comprehensive plans for providing disability protections, including the hiring of a new workforce training, will start to create jobs in our communities. Tzepkowsky & Co. will continue to work with members of The New York Public Safety Board, the NSSB, and the NSSB’s workforce partners to improve the policy in place regarding workplace harassment. During this week’s news hearing, he laid out several basic facts that go into this issue at the WNYC Police Department.
Tzepkowsky (Photo: WNYC Police )
The NYPD is a law enforcement agency. The New York Public Safety Board’s (NPSB) is composed of the NYPD’s Office of Inspector General, the Office of Criminal Investigation Unit, and its Inspector General, the New York State Attorney’s Office (NYSAO). This year the NSSB has appointed three people to the role: Michael W. Pfleger, Commissioner of the NYC Police Department’s Office of Special Investigations (OCI) and Tanya K. Hochberg, Inspector General of Police of the NSSB. Commissioner Pfleger, while providing security for the officers involved, did not make additional appearances during press releases issued throughout the hearing. Pfleger did not provide the name of CIO, and Hochberg did not answer questions. However, Pfleger did provide a short list of things Pfleger did during the hearing.
Commissioner Pfleger (Photo: NSSB)
There is a lack of transparency in the NYPOB policy on police misconduct. It would be appropriate to explain why there is a shortage of information about the NYPD’s officers—a problem Pfleger and various other law enforcement officials face every day. He noted that NYPD
On December 4, 2013, the New York Civil Liberties Union of New York filed suit against NYPD, alleging that the chief and his chief of staff violate the Equal Protection Clause of the First Amendment by taking control of employees’ employment decisions.
As soon as the Brooklyn District Attorney’s office filed its Civil Rights Complaint against the Chief in December, 2013, no further action was taken.
Prior to the trial judge’s decision, the New York Times reported that “police officials have been forced under increasing pressure to address and address problems with minorities that have been long stifled by police efforts to combat discrimination.”
New York state is the second largest Asian-American jurisdiction in the United States, responsible solely for enforcing the Fourth Amendment rights of all residents.
In addition to the city and city of Los Angeles, which are the two largest metropolitan areas in the United States, Los Angeles has also had a number of Latino-American mayors and mayorships, as well as its own police force with over a dozen Latino and African-American mayor-appointed as well as independent police commissioners.
Among the police chief’s positions in the City of Los Angeles are the chief of police, lieutenant commissioner of the LAPD, the chief of detectives, and the vice mayor of the city’s major agencies, according to his employment and career record page on the LAPD. His position at both LAPD and LAPD includes a full-time salary from the city as well as a salary on the city’s pay and benefits structure.
In August 2012, an investigation by the Times concluded that LAPD and city officials could not meet or deal with a “substantial minority” of employees because they did not meet criteria for full-time status for police officers. The Times reported that the findings “demonstrated an unacceptable level of lack of institutional trust and fairness in Los Angeles, a city without even one black officer in any of its seven departments.”
Additionally, on Tuesday, December 7, 2012, a District Court judge decided to reinstate the city of L.A.’s Department of Police as a result of the results of a
The most reliable way for an employer to determine its vulnerability to a class action lawsuit is to gather for itself the same statistical data that plaintiffs would use. If the data shows that, for example, fewer women