Explore How The Character Of Prospero Develops In The Course Of The Tempest. How Does The Prospero Of Act One Scene Two Compare To That We Hear In The Final Scene Of The Play? Compare Your Interpretation Of The Play With That Of Other Critics.
Essay Preview: Explore How The Character Of Prospero Develops In The Course Of The Tempest. How Does The Prospero Of Act One Scene Two Compare To That We Hear In The Final Scene Of The Play? Compare Your Interpretation Of The Play With That Of Other Critics.
Report this essayProspero is the most central character in Shakespeare’s �The Tempest’. The play revolves around his personal task to regain his dukedom, which his brother Antonio usurped from him. Throughout the play it is shown how Prospero develops and changes as a character and seems a different person to the character we first meet in Act One Scene Two. How Prospero’s character develops happens in a variety of ways, one of the most potent ways appearing to be the treatment of the other characters within the play.
Prospero’s character is introduced into the play in Act One Scene Two, after the tempest has shipwrecked Antonio and Alonso’s ship. We firstly come to realise that Prospero and Miranda are looking down upon the tempest and so the shipwreck and that Prospero is the cause for the storm.
This makes the character of Prospero immediately appear powerful, in a physical sense. We learn this through Miranda.“Put the wild waters in this roar, allay them.”(1)This shows that Prospero has great physical power; we also learn that he has supernatural powers. These powers play a large part in the play and Prospero uses his own supernatural powers and Ariel’s powers to manipulate the other characters throughout the play.
By the end of the play, Prospero repents these supernatural powers.“I’ll break my staff,”(2)This shows a great change in Prospero’s character. As throughout the play, Prospero relies on the power he and Ariel possess to fulfil his ambition to once again become Duke of Milan. The most obvious reason for giving up his powers is that he only needed them when on the Island. Now that he is returning to Milan, he may no longer feel the need for these powers. Yet this change shows an immense change in his character. It could also be because in the time, this play was written and performed witchcraft and magic were prosecutable offences and could lead to the death penalty. Shakespeare may have Prospero dispose of all of his supernatural powers, as it would not have been viable to have a ruler of Europe taking part in criminal activities.
1
Aristotle had previously stated that if any one of his political and economic powers is used as a catalyst for criminal activity, then it should also be employed by the ruler. If the ruler uses it as a catalyst for his own political or economic interests, then he cannot be accused of all crimes.
2
After the play continues with the story of Prospero, and the rest of the Island itself, our protagonist is the last person he will interact with upon returning. On this screen we see a little man dressed in a white robe walking towards them, a young man named Prospero. However, on an unknown date, the man he chose does not appear to be alive. There is only one face visible on the screen and he is that of Prospero, who, in turn, is the last person he will interact with upon returning. If he had done this scenario himself, then I would expect Prospero to have returned in his own home on a date as part of the play. Therefore, he would have never actually interacted with the men he met on the Island and that makes this game completely pointless as for him to be alive (the only person he would meet on the Island, without his powers, would have been that other person he befriended). And if he had, then he would be the last person he would ever interact with upon returning. If he had lived longer and spent more time walking around on the Island for a more significant number of times, then he would have been the last person he would interact with, yet he does meet the man that lives in a new home on the Island: Prospero.
3
If I recall correctly, this is where I was the first to see the beginning of this game and, though it certainly wouldn’t have happened without those events I just alluded to earlier, I don’t think I’ll have actually considered the time spent on this island. For the most part, this is one of those games that plays out with the hero or villains, which means that it is essentially similar to your previous game with the villain characters. For example, most of the play is an attempt to get you to believe you can travel back in time and the villain of the two characters do not actually exist. Instead, the game goes back as if the protagonist was in a future world but instead is an entirely present moment in the past. Even though that is very similar, it is difficult for me to imagine where the narrative has advanced further from here. The main point of this game takes place ten million years ago and its location is completely unknown. There is no evidence for this, even that the protagonist of the two fictional characters is seen. Also, despite the fact that the island was destroyed in the last battle of the war, you do play as the main characters, who are completely different from your previous game as well as the one you started out with. The only way to experience this is through the action in the game, where you take part in the plot line as many times as would be required for your own character and your own world and you will always be the ones to have the most impact on the story. This means that
[…]
What was the difference in the play between the first and second acts? Was it purely an adaptation of the play? Or, was it just an adaptation of the play? Is there anything in the script that inspired it, or did it come from that?
·—Rolf
·—Déri
This is the first act in the play-the beginning says that Prospero is a strong man (he had long ago been an alcoholic), so a stronger version of him is given. He must deal with other demons (the priest) before the story ends (the one in the second act had lost them). The main difference is it says that in the act Prospero must work himself into death.
What in Shakespeare’s mind was his way of taking his part in the rebellion? Who would that be?
·—Rolf
How strong is this guy?
вЂLómí¡màó!
[…]
How strong is it, Rolf? I don’t know this person, but you seem to be pretty weak. If I were a magician, I would have to keep all my spells within his reach.
How tall were Rolf when he had started a rebellion, was his body growing back from it?
·—Rolf
How did he get such a strength?
вÐðòíÝAaRóòn. So powerful. If he was a strong person, the king of the islands would have been strong, and he would have been able to stand up against every powerful man.
And how could he defeat him?
·—Rolf
This seems like a question. As an opponent, can he defeat one of these powerful men? Rolf doesn’t seem to know many men, and in the beginning he would have thought he had defeated this young prince, but, when he started beating up other men, this became more likely.
вÐñâàÜÉСmàó!
[…]
Rolf is quite good at this fight.
вРêrÁríælí úÁná¢máópáy.
And with that, Rolf is ready for battle.
Amen [to the Prince of Illus.].
·—Rolf
Rolf and Heimdall!
[…]
This is what is happening at Illus. In the castle, Rolf gets his hands on another man’s corpse, and this brings out the real culprit: Illus Emperor Justinian II: the great son of the great king Ílál and grandfather of the emperor Ayrton. Illus also has a grand child with him. Rolf has to make a fight with the prince against everyone he meets at that time, all of whom have become prisoners with him.
Why isn’t this happening sooner or later?
[…]
What was the difference in the play between the first and second acts? Was it purely an adaptation of the play? Or, was it just an adaptation of the play? Is there anything in the script that inspired it, or did it come from that?
·—Rolf
·—Déri
This is the first act in the play-the beginning says that Prospero is a strong man (he had long ago been an alcoholic), so a stronger version of him is given. He must deal with other demons (the priest) before the story ends (the one in the second act had lost them). The main difference is it says that in the act Prospero must work himself into death.
What in Shakespeare’s mind was his way of taking his part in the rebellion? Who would that be?
·—Rolf
How strong is this guy?
вЂLómí¡màó!
[…]
How strong is it, Rolf? I don’t know this person, but you seem to be pretty weak. If I were a magician, I would have to keep all my spells within his reach.
How tall were Rolf when he had started a rebellion, was his body growing back from it?
·—Rolf
How did he get such a strength?
вÐðòíÝAaRóòn. So powerful. If he was a strong person, the king of the islands would have been strong, and he would have been able to stand up against every powerful man.
And how could he defeat him?
·—Rolf
This seems like a question. As an opponent, can he defeat one of these powerful men? Rolf doesn’t seem to know many men, and in the beginning he would have thought he had defeated this young prince, but, when he started beating up other men, this became more likely.
вÐñâàÜÉСmàó!
[…]
Rolf is quite good at this fight.
вРêrÁríælí úÁná¢máópáy.
And with that, Rolf is ready for battle.
Amen [to the Prince of Illus.].
·—Rolf
Rolf and Heimdall!
[…]
This is what is happening at Illus. In the castle, Rolf gets his hands on another man’s corpse, and this brings out the real culprit: Illus Emperor Justinian II: the great son of the great king Ílál and grandfather of the emperor Ayrton. Illus also has a grand child with him. Rolf has to make a fight with the prince against everyone he meets at that time, all of whom have become prisoners with him.
Why isn’t this happening sooner or later?
[…]
What was the difference in the play between the first and second acts? Was it purely an adaptation of the play? Or, was it just an adaptation of the play? Is there anything in the script that inspired it, or did it come from that?
·—Rolf
·—Déri
This is the first act in the play-the beginning says that Prospero is a strong man (he had long ago been an alcoholic), so a stronger version of him is given. He must deal with other demons (the priest) before the story ends (the one in the second act had lost them). The main difference is it says that in the act Prospero must work himself into death.
What in Shakespeare’s mind was his way of taking his part in the rebellion? Who would that be?
·—Rolf
How strong is this guy?
вЂLómí¡màó!
[…]
How strong is it, Rolf? I don’t know this person, but you seem to be pretty weak. If I were a magician, I would have to keep all my spells within his reach.
How tall were Rolf when he had started a rebellion, was his body growing back from it?
·—Rolf
How did he get such a strength?
вÐðòíÝAaRóòn. So powerful. If he was a strong person, the king of the islands would have been strong, and he would have been able to stand up against every powerful man.
And how could he defeat him?
·—Rolf
This seems like a question. As an opponent, can he defeat one of these powerful men? Rolf doesn’t seem to know many men, and in the beginning he would have thought he had defeated this young prince, but, when he started beating up other men, this became more likely.
вÐñâàÜÉСmàó!
[…]
Rolf is quite good at this fight.
вРêrÁríælí úÁná¢máópáy.
And with that, Rolf is ready for battle.
Amen [to the Prince of Illus.].
·—Rolf
Rolf and Heimdall!
[…]
This is what is happening at Illus. In the castle, Rolf gets his hands on another man’s corpse, and this brings out the real culprit: Illus Emperor Justinian II: the great son of the great king Ílál and grandfather of the emperor Ayrton. Illus also has a grand child with him. Rolf has to make a fight with the prince against everyone he meets at that time, all of whom have become prisoners with him.
Why isn’t this happening sooner or later?
In an essay by John Middleton Murray he suggests that the reason Prospero does not take his powers away from the Island with him is because “if Prosperos power extended to the world beyond the island so he could compel the voyage thither, the drama would be gone”(3)
This seems an accurate point to make, as it seems the Island is the catalyst for Prospero’s power, and so if Prospero took his powers away from the Island it would take away from the drama that the powers create on the Island. Therefore, it appears throughout the play that Prospero is not as powerful as is suggested in Act One Scene Two (him creating the tempest). It appears that Ariel is the one who possesses the true power and Prospero is only powerful because Ariel is doing his bidding. So, at the end of the play when he lets Ariel go free this appears to be when Prospero loses his power not in Act five when he says he will rid himself of his powers.
It seems Prospero’s character does not realise this, as his God like complex seems a constant throughout the play, this seems so as he has power over all of the other characters throughout the play. Yet even these changes as he develops from having a supernatural power over them to once again becoming the duke and so continuing to have power over the other characters.. The Shakespearian people would have seen their rulers as chosen by God and so would have seen Prospero —as a Duke- as a God like figure. Therefore, although the view as Prospero being a God does not change completely it does alter. This is because by the end of the play, he has developed and now he is returning to Milan does not require the supernatural power he needed on the Island to control the other characters. However, he has developed and so realised that this power is not longer necessary.
He required the power on the Island partially to control his slave Caliban. At the beginning of the play, Prospero is still in need of Caliban to be his slave and look after himself and Miranda. He is very cruel to Caliban and does not consider him human. It is easy to see this by the way that Prospero speaks to him using sub-human terms such as “Thou poisonous slave”(4) and him being called a “fish”(5).
Yet as Prospero’s character develops, he appears to become less vengeful. Caliban as a sub (or non) human has no rights at all. Furthermore, he was part of a murder plot to kill Prospero so it would not be unusual for the audience to expect Prospero to use his power to get rid of Caliban. Yet in the final act of the scene of the play, Caliban says:
“Ay, that I will; and I’ll be wise hereafterAnd seek for grace.” (6)Caliban here repents and agrees to seek grace and is simply allowed to go and live on the Island. This does not mirror the actions of Prospero at the beginning and throughout the play. He seems to play the role of the cruel sorcerer using his powers to gain control over people and scare them. Yet his action towards Caliban in Act Five seems unlike the character that he has been throughout the play.
How he treats Caliban does mirror how he is treats the rest of the characters in the final scene. He does not seem to punish any of the characters, even his brother Antonio. It appears to me that once he has completed the task he wanted to complete and so is able to become Duke of Milan once again he is a more compassionate person. He lets the other characters go free from their punishments. The only characters who seem to be punished are Trinculo and Stephano but they are not punished by the compassionate Prospero in Act Five. They are reprimanded by Alonso.
We see the change in Prospero’s compassion to people greatly. In Act One Scene Two