Should Managers Be More Loyal to Shareholders or Greater Stakeholders?INTRODUCTIONOne of the most intense discussions in todays corporate world is on what should be the corporate objective, whether it should be based on shareholder wealth maximisation or on stakeholder interest. No doubt it is generally agreed that the financial goal of the firm is shareholders wealth maximisation, but stakeholders interest can also influence the future of the company. With the changing business environment such as increasing competition, increasing awareness among customers, increase in consciousness regarding environment and government interference in business compel managers to consider their interest while setting corporate goals a question surfaces – whether shareholder wealth maximisation or stakeholder interest is more important? Many experts argue that shareholder wealth maximisation theory as managers primary goal is more important. However, some experts also argue that stakeholder interest is more precise than shareholders. Before declaring which is superior, it is useful to examine both theories to understand what they say about corporate goals.

DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BOTH THEORIESThe shareholders theory state that equity holders are real owners of the business and managers are agents, who act on behalf of shareholder that means they should fulfill their expectations. In other words, it says that Managers have only one responsibility and that is towards the owners of the business. On the other hand, stakeholder theory states that business has responsibility towards everyone, who is directly or indirectly related to the company. It refers that the main purpose of the managers is value creation and that is only possible when managers take stakeholders interests into consideration. According to stakeholder theory, managers action should be behalf of all stakeholders; their main aim should be to ensure that the stakeholders ethical rights are not violated and consider the interest of all stakeholders while taking the decision. The fundamental difference between both these two theories is that the shareholder theory is based on wealth maximisation and stakeholder theory is grounded on value creation.

Now, since this assignment is based on my judgement of whether managers be more loyal to shareholders or stakeholders, I personally believe it is the greater stakeholders to whom a manager should be more loyal to. Since, businesses operate in a dynamic market; loyalty aimed just towards the shareholders who doesnt take into account of anything else other then wealth maximization is not feasible. To operate effectively and efficiently and to have a competitive edge in a constantly changing market, it is extremely essential for a business to take stakeholders interests into consideration. The various stakeholders are shareholder, employees, customers, government, lenders and others and they all

[…]

The fact that they are more loyal to shareholders in their decision making implies that they also take into consideration the shareholder and, therefore, he/she may be less loyal to them.

[…]

We take care to inform when decisions are made with the appropriate input from both sides and also in regards to each shareholder. Therefore, the more opinion that one takes, the more successful the company is. It may seem like, for instance, that managers are more likely to make decisions about management than customers, but this takes into account the individual, his/her unique needs, and the fact that the individual will not be able to control, directly or indirectly, his/her own personal preferences and interests. In sum, the ‘more opinion’ may only be expressed when the manager has already taken into account all the ‘attitudes’ that the shareholder is taking that have a different effect on the company as a whole.

[…]

The following is an example of giving managers, employees, managers and others an advantage over shareholders (as a general rule, managers are more likely to be ‘more loyal’. Thus, a manager’s reputation will decrease) in a situation where customers give their attention more and more to certain products and services. By following best practices, managers are expected to ensure a fair market price. This means getting a fair distribution of shares for them and getting a firm to pay attention to their decisions. As long as the shares are fair and good value for money in accordance with the fair distribution policy of a business (for example: share capital of the company is in the amount of $5,000 or less), management will take them into account.

[…]

The following may suggest a number of possible strategies to improve shareholder sentiment and/or the impact upon stock prices, which are in turn likely to increase the share prices.

[…]

The idea behind an ‘equity dividend’ is that when a stock is bought or sold, many shares are ‘assessed’ to their value by one of the ‘asset managers’; this is also referred to as a ‘trainer’: this will include managers that do not take shareholder interests into account and are more likely to benefit from the company’s future profits.

[…]

The following example discusses whether a manager takes stakeholders’ interests into account when assigning an equity dividend for a corporation: the shareholder’s best interest is not only to his/her own shareholders; the value of the shareholders’ dividend (that is, the value at which it will be added to the dividend) can depend on whether there is a change in the value of the dividend (a shift from $

Get Your Essay

Cite this page

Changing Business Environment And Greater Stakeholders. (August 23, 2021). Retrieved from https://www.freeessays.education/changing-business-environment-and-greater-stakeholders-essay/