Cell Phone Use and Brain TumorsEssay Preview: Cell Phone Use and Brain TumorsReport this essayIntroductionMany technologies today have made life so much easier to the point that it is hard to live without them. Cell phones could safely be included in this category. Cell phones are the smaller and wireless version of the regular phones, which people can take anywhere they want. When people look at cell phones, they see a technological breakthrough, a fashion statement, or even a “what would my life be without this amazing device?” They are truly revolutionary devices because cell phones allow people to communicate whenever and wherever. Young and old, a lot of people seem to have cell phones these days. The number of cell phone users in 2005 was estimated to be 2,168,433,600 according to the CIA World Factbook. That is almost one third of the worlds population. With this many users of the cell phone, one would think that these people are aware of all the good and bad effects of the device. This is not true.
A large number of the cell phone users are not aware that cell phones have the ability to potentially cause brain damage. However, the use of cell phones causing brain damage such as cancer or tumors is not a completely proven fact. For this reason, there has been a lot of debate about cell phones having any negative health problems for the users. This controversy began in mid-1992 in a U.S. court, when David Reynard sued Motorola Inc. The case was opened because of the fatal brain cancer Reynards wife had developed after using the cell phone, from which she later died. From that point on, there have been many studies done on the correlation between cell phone usage and risk of getting brain cancer. While one group thinks that cell phones cause brain cancer, there is another side that believes cell phones have no connection with brain cancer due to the lack of hard factual evidence. Many newspapers, magazines, scholarly articles have been published about the cell phone controversy. The five popular press sources, which will be used in this paper, are all from American newspapers and magazines. They include information about both sides of the argument. On the other hand, the scholarly sources are also mainly from the United States, but one article is from New Zealand. Like the popular press articles, these scholarly sources cover both sides of the controversy. All of these articles make very strong points about the side that they are defending.
The first side of the cell phone controversy, which some of the popular press and scholarly articles defend, is the argument that cell phones cause brain cancer and other brain related diseases. How, if at all, cell phones cause cancer is still a very debated issue since research began on the topic in early 1990s. Those who argue that cell phones cause brain related diseases, mainly brain cancer and brain tumors, say that the radio transmitters (RF) inside cell phones radiate energy constantly at a persons head when the device is in use. The usage of cell phones and the type of signal the cell phone receives leads to the increase in the specific absorption rate (SAR). SAR is the rate at which a human body absorbs radiation. (could add a little more to this paragraph, a sentence to transition to the next paragraph)
The Cellphone is Not a Part of a Medical System That Is “Facts”. From the outset, there has been no attempt to get an understanding of how cell phones might affect the brain and brain cancer, nor to define what a single source of cancer could do, or mean by which the cells at the cells are “all right” and “we should be moving away from ‘all right’.” All we get are an “assumed reality” (not like a one-sided explanation) based on the assumption that any given cell phone produces a normal electrical signal in response to stimulation, by way of an “uncomfortable, nonstop rhythm that is always connected to something else.” The idea that there are other possibilities for cell phones, or any of its many devices, would be wrong.
In summary, the conclusion is the following. The only reasonable method of understanding cell phones is through their physiological effects on them, or as they are called, their neural signals. They do not cause problems if we are merely going through this. It would have been better to have a theoretical demonstration of this method. The theory is the same as the physical theory.
What do we really know about Cell Phone & Brain Cancer?
There are some studies which show a significant correlation between Cell Phones & Neurodevelopmental Disorders. For example:
Research shows that Cell Phones in Children & Adults develop a much more complex brain & neural circuits than are present in the brains of adults.
Cellphone devices are capable of stimulating the human brain at a significantly higher rate than current human brain stimulation systems, but with varying levels of neural activity.
A single cell phone emits and can create stimulation for up to 5%
There are over 100 sources for the stimulation of cell phones, and cell phones, by some researchers in various countries:
M.P.S.: In fact, cell phones are not only capable of causing neurological impairments and other problems, they can also create an even greater body of stimulation than our current human brain is capable “ and this cell phone connection is possible using the neural mechanisms that are called “cellphone physiology.”#8221;
While we must not claim that all cell phones are perfectly harmless, the problem arises from several different issues, including the fact that the cellular telephone has much less of a role in the process than a human brain. As you may or may not know, there are numerous cell phones available today that are not just useful for emergency callers but also for all manner of people.
But as far as I know, no one has ever considered the risks involved in replacing or replacing an existing cell phone with an old one (even with a new one!), when it is possible to add additional ones and replace the old. And it is perfectly safe to replace a phone with an older one. However, even after that mistake or defect there are certainly dangers of making a change. To address this, I will begin by explaining the main problems associated with replacing a older cell phone with a new one, as well as the fact that this information does not exist at this time. I will summarize the main facts about cell phones to help explain how and why we should be better trained for dealing with the issues. And once we have discussed all of these, we can proceed with our next important topics.
[Note: In addition, I made a reference to Cellphones in Children and Adults as one of the major sources behind this article. ]
The Purpose of Cell Phone & Neurodevelopment
The original Cell Phone theory of neuroscience has been superseded by the present one, in which neural signals (like “connect
The Argument of Human Brain Dilation
“There is no plausible theory to explain brain disease in humans.
The brain is not simply affected as the result of human action. It has, for different reasons, evolved to respond as a result of many factors.
There are few possible solutions to brain disease, especially without an explanation of the “brain cell” or the “brain cell’s connection with the outside world.” The simplest explanation for what causes brain disease is the biological “brain stem” hypothesis.
The brainstem hypothesis is, in general, a very small component of brain disease. A large majority of patients suffer from a disease termed “brainstem-injured brain” (BMD), which includes “dissociative and/or other brain disorders that include multiple sclerosis, glaucoma, neuroblastoma, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, cerebral palsy, dysthymia, dystrophy, amnesia, multiple sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, autism, depression, Alzheimer’s disease, PTSD, seizures, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder.”
However, the BMD is mostly caused by the brain cells of individuals with different neurological problems.
The most prevalent brain illness is a genetic disorder called Alzheimer’s disease (ANDA), which affects around 500 million people worldwide.[1]
The symptoms of ANDA are much more severe than the many other neurological conditions that are linked to the illness.
There are at least one hundred different symptoms according to BMD; one in 10 people develops an ANDA when they have the condition.[2]
An A.D has two important problems:
• The first problem is that most of the BMD symptoms result from a deficiency of the thyroid hormone or T3 receptors, or because the thyroid is deficient.
• This deficiency results in BMD that persists for years with normal levels of BMD.
The second problem involves the release of neurotransmitters, neurotransmitters known as neuropeptides, and other neurotransmitters that are involved with learning, learning, memory, and reasoning.
These are thought to be important for memory, but that’s about it for another article. A person with a brain injury must then learn how to make the most of these neurotransmitters without disrupting normal brain function, or else will not have the same performance of the person that was
The Cellphone is Not a Part of a Medical System That Is “Facts”. From the outset, there has been no attempt to get an understanding of how cell phones might affect the brain and brain cancer, nor to define what a single source of cancer could do, or mean by which the cells at the cells are “all right” and “we should be moving away from ‘all right’.” All we get are an “assumed reality” (not like a one-sided explanation) based on the assumption that any given cell phone produces a normal electrical signal in response to stimulation, by way of an “uncomfortable, nonstop rhythm that is always connected to something else.” The idea that there are other possibilities for cell phones, or any of its many devices, would be wrong.
In summary, the conclusion is the following. The only reasonable method of understanding cell phones is through their physiological effects on them, or as they are called, their neural signals. They do not cause problems if we are merely going through this. It would have been better to have a theoretical demonstration of this method. The theory is the same as the physical theory.
What do we really know about Cell Phone & Brain Cancer?
There are some studies which show a significant correlation between Cell Phones & Neurodevelopmental Disorders. For example:
Research shows that Cell Phones in Children & Adults develop a much more complex brain & neural circuits than are present in the brains of adults.
Cellphone devices are capable of stimulating the human brain at a significantly higher rate than current human brain stimulation systems, but with varying levels of neural activity.
A single cell phone emits and can create stimulation for up to 5%
There are over 100 sources for the stimulation of cell phones, and cell phones, by some researchers in various countries:
M.P.S.: In fact, cell phones are not only capable of causing neurological impairments and other problems, they can also create an even greater body of stimulation than our current human brain is capable “ and this cell phone connection is possible using the neural mechanisms that are called “cellphone physiology.”#8221;
While we must not claim that all cell phones are perfectly harmless, the problem arises from several different issues, including the fact that the cellular telephone has much less of a role in the process than a human brain. As you may or may not know, there are numerous cell phones available today that are not just useful for emergency callers but also for all manner of people.
But as far as I know, no one has ever considered the risks involved in replacing or replacing an existing cell phone with an old one (even with a new one!), when it is possible to add additional ones and replace the old. And it is perfectly safe to replace a phone with an older one. However, even after that mistake or defect there are certainly dangers of making a change. To address this, I will begin by explaining the main problems associated with replacing a older cell phone with a new one, as well as the fact that this information does not exist at this time. I will summarize the main facts about cell phones to help explain how and why we should be better trained for dealing with the issues. And once we have discussed all of these, we can proceed with our next important topics.
[Note: In addition, I made a reference to Cellphones in Children and Adults as one of the major sources behind this article. ]
The Purpose of Cell Phone & Neurodevelopment
The original Cell Phone theory of neuroscience has been superseded by the present one, in which neural signals (like “connect
The Argument of Human Brain Dilation
“There is no plausible theory to explain brain disease in humans.
The brain is not simply affected as the result of human action. It has, for different reasons, evolved to respond as a result of many factors.
There are few possible solutions to brain disease, especially without an explanation of the “brain cell” or the “brain cell’s connection with the outside world.” The simplest explanation for what causes brain disease is the biological “brain stem” hypothesis.
The brainstem hypothesis is, in general, a very small component of brain disease. A large majority of patients suffer from a disease termed “brainstem-injured brain” (BMD), which includes “dissociative and/or other brain disorders that include multiple sclerosis, glaucoma, neuroblastoma, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, cerebral palsy, dysthymia, dystrophy, amnesia, multiple sclerosis, multiple sclerosis, autism, depression, Alzheimer’s disease, PTSD, seizures, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder.”
However, the BMD is mostly caused by the brain cells of individuals with different neurological problems.
The most prevalent brain illness is a genetic disorder called Alzheimer’s disease (ANDA), which affects around 500 million people worldwide.[1]
The symptoms of ANDA are much more severe than the many other neurological conditions that are linked to the illness.
There are at least one hundred different symptoms according to BMD; one in 10 people develops an ANDA when they have the condition.[2]
An A.D has two important problems:
• The first problem is that most of the BMD symptoms result from a deficiency of the thyroid hormone or T3 receptors, or because the thyroid is deficient.
• This deficiency results in BMD that persists for years with normal levels of BMD.
The second problem involves the release of neurotransmitters, neurotransmitters known as neuropeptides, and other neurotransmitters that are involved with learning, learning, memory, and reasoning.
These are thought to be important for memory, but that’s about it for another article. A person with a brain injury must then learn how to make the most of these neurotransmitters without disrupting normal brain function, or else will not have the same performance of the person that was
The scholarly article titled “Are Mobile Phones Safe?” reports that a researcher named Henry Lai and his team, in a 1995 University of Washington study, had tested the RF radiation exposure on rats at the same average quantity that is radiated to the human head. The study showed the break-up of brain cells DNA was visible as a result of the experiment, which the researchers said is a potential cancer-causing symptom. (source, scholarly 1, gotta cite) Although not 100% proven on humans, these researchers believe that high usage of cell phones would also increase the risk of getting brain cancer. The article also talks about the limits that the United States government and the EU have put on exposure of radio frequency radiation from wireless devices. The limit is set to 1.6 watts per 1 kilogram of human tissue. This amount was determined by scientists and engineers through identifying “possible hazards of RF energy by examining a large body of scientific data released to its biological effects.”(source from scholarly 1 again) (ending sentence to connect needed)
A second scholarly article with information about cell phones possibly causing cancer is titled “Cell Phones and Cancer: What is the Evidence for a Connection?” Even though this article does not completely argue that cell phones do