Nutrasweet After Holland Sweetener Company’s Decision to Enter into the European and Canadian Aspartame Markets? – Case Study – jzuba92
Search
Essays
Sign up
Sign in
Contact us
Tweet
Index
/Business
Nutrasweet After Holland Sweetener Company’s Decision to Enter into the European and Canadian Aspartame Markets?
Put yourself in the shoes of Winfried Vermijs as of late 1986. What response should he expect from NutraSweet after Holland Sweetener Company’s decision to enter into the European and Canadian aspartame markets?As of late 1986, aspartame became a major sweetener because of its unique properties that rivaled sugar. Aspartame is 180 times sweeter than sugar, has the same caloric content as sugar, and does not promote tooth decay when compared to sugar. Because aspartame is not suitable for baking due to its instability at high temperatures, G.D. Searle & Co. realized the potential to use aspartame as a tabletop sweetener and a replacement for sugar in soft drinks. Searle acquired the patents for the “use” and “blend” of aspartame and created NutraSweet, a separate operating division, to have a monopoly over the aspartame market. In 1987, these patents are set to expire in Europe and Canada, so it is a major opportunity for Winfried Vermijs and his Holland Sweetener Company (HSC) to enter the small aspartame market and compete against NutraSweet. Upon the announcement of HSC’s decision to enter into the European and Canadian aspartame markets, Vermijs should expect NutraSweet to respond somewhat combatively, as their parent company discovered aspartame and they have dominated the market since. NutraSweet will likely respond to HSC’s debut by promoting their own product familiarity and quality and by lowering the price of their product to drive out the competition.The major buyers of aspartame are the soft drink companies Coca Cola and Pepsi, which use the sweetener in their diet beverages. NutraSweet cleverly negotiated multi-year contracts with these soft drink companies to become their exclusive suppliers of aspartame. When HSC uncovered that NutraSweet had multi-year contracts with these companies, HSC filed an anti-competitive complaint with the European Commission. Assuming the European Commission deems these multi-year contracts to be anti-competitive, it does not necessarily mean that the soft drink companies will change suppliers of aspartame. Coca Cola and Pepsi may consider the idea of changing suppliers, but NutraSweet would aggressively market their product by emphasizing that it has been used in the soft drink company’s diet beverages for years and that the consumers of the beverages would be familiar with the taste of their specific product. Changing up suppliers could be a risky move for Coca Cola and Pepsi. NutraSweet can also attack HSC on the quality of their aspartame, as HSC’s manufacturing process employees a natural catalyst to solve the problem of achieving a precise coupling between the aspartic acid and phenylalanine inputs, which is not a proven and credible process to produce aspartame. The trust factor associated with NutraSweet’s brand would be an important differentiator that HSC could not provide.

When HCS tries to compete for the soft drink manufacturers’ business in 1987, Winfried can expect that NutraSweet will engage in a price war with HSC to keep total control over the aspartame market. NutraSweet’s response would likely be to cut rates for the soft drink companies to prevent HSC from settling into the market. This approach may not be the most beneficial scenario for either party because these discounts would end up cutting from both company’s profits. However, this would be appealing to the soft drink companies, which will get a better deal on their aspartame supply. This price-cutting strategy could help NutraSweet maintain its monopoly over the aspartame market. In the short term, NutraSweet will probably end up experiencing a profit loss due to the discounts, but this will serve eliminate a competitor from the market. In the long term, NutraSweet could retain total control over the aspartame market.How should Vermijs assess the relative likelihood of the two scenarios — price war vs. normal competition (“live and let live”) — he has in mind?        While Vermijs should be prepared for either normal competition or a price war, he should spend more energy strategizing on how best to respond to a price war, as this seems to be a more likely scenario, considering NutraSweet’s history of market dominance. They are unlikely to give in without a fight. To prepare for a price war, Holland Sweetener Company (HSC) should take any steps they can to cut costs, particularly in production. HSC already claims its aspartame-production method was more cost effective than NutraSweet’s method (although this is disputed), but they should continue to find ways to cut costs, in order to allow them to sell their product at a lower price point to both companies and consumers. Due to the factors mentioned in response to the previous question, it will be difficult for HSC to survive a price war against NutraSweet. However, if they start trimming the fat now, they may stand a chance.

Continue for 4 more pages »
Read full document
Download as (for upgraded members)
Citation Generator
MLA 7
CHICAGO
(2019, 01). Nutrasweet After Holland Sweetener Company’s Decision to Enter into the European and Canadian Aspartame Markets?. EssaysForStudent.com. Retrieved 01, 2019, from

“Nutrasweet After Holland Sweetener Company’s Decision to Enter into the European and Canadian Aspartame Markets?” EssaysForStudent.com. 01 2019. 2019. 01 2019 < "Nutrasweet After Holland Sweetener Company’s Decision to Enter into the European and Canadian Aspartame Markets?." EssaysForStudent.com. EssaysForStudent.com, 01 2019. Web. 01 2019. < "Nutrasweet After Holland Sweetener Company’s Decision to Enter into the European and Canadian Aspartame Markets?." EssaysForStudent.com. 01, 2019. Accessed 01, 2019. Essay Preview By: jzuba92 Submitted: January 27, 2019 Essay Length: 1,141 Words / 5 Pages Paper type: Case Study Views: 217 Report this essay Tweet Related Essays A Distressed Electric Motor Company in the European Motor Industry Synopsis Business is built upon relationships. So when a reputable electric motors company (EMC) is confronted with losing a large business association, a quick and 1,796 Words  |  8 Pages Do Successful Companies Value Social Responsibility and Ethics in Marketing in India? Do successful companies value Social Responsibility and Ethics in Marketing in India? Prof. Sudeep Chatterjee* Introduction India, the second largest democracy, saw the initiation of 3,861 Words  |  16 Pages Holland Sweetener Introduction The Holland Sweetener Company (HSC) is planning to enter the low-calorie, high-intensity sweetener market which is currently dominated by NutraSweet. Below we first analyze 1,645 Words  |  7 Pages The Context of Decision Making at Whole Foods Market The Context of Decision Making at Whole Foods Market Case 1 Wayne Davis Question 1: How would you describe the merchandising and operational decisions made 1,071 Words  |  5 Pages Similar Topics Foxmeyer Drug Company Case Nakamura Lacquer Company Get Access to 89,000+ Essays and Term Papers Join 209,000+ Other Students High Quality Essays and Documents Sign up © 2008–2020 EssaysForStudent.comFree Essays, Book Reports, Term Papers and Research Papers Essays Sign up Sign in Contact us Site Map Privacy Policy Terms of Service Facebook Twitter

Get Your Essay

Cite this page

Canadian Aspartame Markets And Soft Drinks. (July 15, 2021). Retrieved from https://www.freeessays.education/canadian-aspartame-markets-and-soft-drinks-essay/