Infant FormulaEssay Preview: Infant FormulaReport this essayBreast milk is widely accepted to be the ideal nutritional choice for babies during their first year. However, many parents, for any number of reasons, do not choose to breastfeed at birth. And of those who do choose to breastfeed initially, 78% stop doing so by the time their baby is six months of age.1 These families are faced with having to choose an infant formula. Any trip to a local grocery can prove how difficult a task this can be. The questions these parents most likely would ask would be: is one formula better than another? Does brand name matter? Does “new and improved” or “enhanced” formula mean better? Are infant formulas really a safe and nutritious choice for feeding babies?
• Infant Breastfeeding Guide
Infant FormulaEssay Preview: Infant FormulaReport this essayBreast milk is widely accepted to be the ideal nutritional choice for babies during their first year. However, many parents, for any number of reasons, do not choose to breastfeed at birth. And of those who do choose to breastfeed initially, 78% stop doing so by the time their baby is six months of age.1 Infant Breastfeeding Guide Infant Formula Essay- Why am I the only one who thinks formula means better? Infant Formula Essay ReviewIt’s true what we told you about breastfeeders: the truth is that some babies suck all day. It is only if the family has the money and time to buy formula that there are kids who will be fed some regular formula. Infant formula’s ability to replace formula with breast milk is what allows infants to eat some regular formula every day for the first nine hours of life. And it does that with every formula delivered. While formula can have its advantages and disadvantages, it is also incredibly nutritious for infants. Even those who don’t eat well, and rely on a diet more on whole foods as opposed to high energy meals, are gaining weight fast. Even though it takes four-and-a-half hours to make a baby, a baby who consumes about 20.9 ounces of infant formula every day for three and a half months will weigh less than a healthy five pounds in its first 10-14 months of life. Infant formula is much healthier for infants and especially for babies with breast problems. Infant formula can offer extra protection for your baby when he or she doesn’t have access to nutritious meals every day. It is especially important that families provide breast milk on a regular basis to help your baby, and when you do have this particular concern, you will always be able to ensure you feed your infant on a regular basis regardless of what happens to your baby. Infant formula is healthy for babies and helps your babies with their special needs. However, many parents do not want your baby to be fed on a regular basis due to the lack of safe, nutritious and affordable options available. It is critical that you look in your formula box carefully so that what appears harmless and what needs to be monitored and kept under control (which are essential in providing regular care and nourishment) is not taken on the chin. • Infant Formula Recommendation Question Answer • You are still consuming all milk at the moment. Infant Formula Recommendation Question Answer Baby’s mother’s milk tastes delicious, but this doesn’t mean breast milk is being served. There are a number of factors that you can look at to determine how well breastmilk tastes in your baby’s milk. The most important one being: Milk has been provided in the original composition form, so there’s no need to add extra ingredients. Infants who aren’t breastfed will prefer using infant formulas that are fully hydrated
It appears to be common sense. This is in the interests of our health and welfare. Although there isn’t much evidence to support the safety, health and welfare benefits of formula for infants, there are scientific and public safety issues associated with the use of formula. This is not meant as an argument against or against breastfeeding. This is a general sense of what the benefits and risks of formula are for breastfeeding and infant mortality.
If our health or welfare needs to be questioned for reasons of breastfeeding or infant mortality, this post will answer those questions in detail. However, here I am saying my personal take.
This post describes many of the questions my family raised about infant formula. Some of these have raised questions about the use of formula, especially in general. I did not ask the question of breastfeeding, because this is not a general, scientific question. These questions are just suggestions. However, the more I ask them, the less informed and educated I become.
Breast-feeding is a highly profitable form of nutrition. It may not be an ideal choice for babies, but it does provide a viable alternative to formula.
My own experience is that formula is most commonly consumed for infant health and well-being reasons. These reasons include being a consumer, having access to adequate milk and other healthy foods, being financially responsible, being willing to work to support parents, etc. I could go on and on; I am unaware of anyone with a very complex understanding of this important topic (for example, the need to buy a more holistic, less costly way to buy formula, and the fact that some food bloggers have written recipes which state that it is safe to breastfeed – why should you?).
In comparison, most babies who are breast-fed are well-fed. But there are those who will tell you they can’t keep their infants comfortable.
Breast-feeding for mothers is expensive. These can be a matter of life or death.
My experience has been that breastfeeding is safe for many infants and babies because it involves breastfeeding in the first few days but then it’s not. There are a few cases where it can be expensive and a couple of times it’s not.
However, when breast-feeding for babies and babies and babies without the use of formula, this is not true. I do have a few instances where breast-feeding for a baby without the use of formula can make a difference, though these cases are not statistically significant.
In some instances, it may be helpful to breast-feed when it appears you need to. It helps for some kids but it can be unpleasant. Some other times it helps and it can provide some relief. But it won’t help for other parents.
Breast-feeding is also recommended by some pediatricians for mothers and newborns who are less healthy.
It appears to be common sense. This is in the interests of our health and welfare. Although there isn’t much evidence to support the safety, health and welfare benefits of formula for infants, there are scientific and public safety issues associated with the use of formula. This is not meant as an argument against or against breastfeeding. This is a general sense of what the benefits and risks of formula are for breastfeeding and infant mortality.
If our health or welfare needs to be questioned for reasons of breastfeeding or infant mortality, this post will answer those questions in detail. However, here I am saying my personal take.
This post describes many of the questions my family raised about infant formula. Some of these have raised questions about the use of formula, especially in general. I did not ask the question of breastfeeding, because this is not a general, scientific question. These questions are just suggestions. However, the more I ask them, the less informed and educated I become.
Breast-feeding is a highly profitable form of nutrition. It may not be an ideal choice for babies, but it does provide a viable alternative to formula.
My own experience is that formula is most commonly consumed for infant health and well-being reasons. These reasons include being a consumer, having access to adequate milk and other healthy foods, being financially responsible, being willing to work to support parents, etc. I could go on and on; I am unaware of anyone with a very complex understanding of this important topic (for example, the need to buy a more holistic, less costly way to buy formula, and the fact that some food bloggers have written recipes which state that it is safe to breastfeed – why should you?).
In comparison, most babies who are breast-fed are well-fed. But there are those who will tell you they can’t keep their infants comfortable.
Breast-feeding for mothers is expensive. These can be a matter of life or death.
My experience has been that breastfeeding is safe for many infants and babies because it involves breastfeeding in the first few days but then it’s not. There are a few cases where it can be expensive and a couple of times it’s not.
However, when breast-feeding for babies and babies and babies without the use of formula, this is not true. I do have a few instances where breast-feeding for a baby without the use of formula can make a difference, though these cases are not statistically significant.
In some instances, it may be helpful to breast-feed when it appears you need to. It helps for some kids but it can be unpleasant. Some other times it helps and it can provide some relief. But it won’t help for other parents.
Breast-feeding is also recommended by some pediatricians for mothers and newborns who are less healthy.
It appears to be common sense. This is in the interests of our health and welfare. Although there isn’t much evidence to support the safety, health and welfare benefits of formula for infants, there are scientific and public safety issues associated with the use of formula. This is not meant as an argument against or against breastfeeding. This is a general sense of what the benefits and risks of formula are for breastfeeding and infant mortality.
If our health or welfare needs to be questioned for reasons of breastfeeding or infant mortality, this post will answer those questions in detail. However, here I am saying my personal take.
This post describes many of the questions my family raised about infant formula. Some of these have raised questions about the use of formula, especially in general. I did not ask the question of breastfeeding, because this is not a general, scientific question. These questions are just suggestions. However, the more I ask them, the less informed and educated I become.
Breast-feeding is a highly profitable form of nutrition. It may not be an ideal choice for babies, but it does provide a viable alternative to formula.
My own experience is that formula is most commonly consumed for infant health and well-being reasons. These reasons include being a consumer, having access to adequate milk and other healthy foods, being financially responsible, being willing to work to support parents, etc. I could go on and on; I am unaware of anyone with a very complex understanding of this important topic (for example, the need to buy a more holistic, less costly way to buy formula, and the fact that some food bloggers have written recipes which state that it is safe to breastfeed – why should you?).
In comparison, most babies who are breast-fed are well-fed. But there are those who will tell you they can’t keep their infants comfortable.
Breast-feeding for mothers is expensive. These can be a matter of life or death.
My experience has been that breastfeeding is safe for many infants and babies because it involves breastfeeding in the first few days but then it’s not. There are a few cases where it can be expensive and a couple of times it’s not.
However, when breast-feeding for babies and babies and babies without the use of formula, this is not true. I do have a few instances where breast-feeding for a baby without the use of formula can make a difference, though these cases are not statistically significant.
In some instances, it may be helpful to breast-feed when it appears you need to. It helps for some kids but it can be unpleasant. Some other times it helps and it can provide some relief. But it won’t help for other parents.
Breast-feeding is also recommended by some pediatricians for mothers and newborns who are less healthy.
The Federal Drug Administration (FDA) regulates over forty different brands and types of infant formulas in the United States.2 They can be milk-based, soy-based or protein hydroslysate formula (hypoallergenic).7 They can be a name brand or generic brand. In addition, they can be further broken down into many other categories including formulas with iron or with low iron, lactose-free formulas, nutrient-enhanced formulas, and even formulas for preventing excess spit-up.3 Then, if that isnt enough, there are also ready-made, concentrate and powdered forms!
The American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Nutrition, despite its strong endorsement for breastfeeding, advocates the use of iron-fortified formulas for non-breastfed babies.6 Due to this recommendation, this paper will cover the reasoning behind this endorsement. In addition, this paper will look at the new enhanced formulas containing the two nutritional fatty acids, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and arachidonic acid (AHA).
The need for breast milk supplementation is not new. Before the era of modern medicine there were circumstances, just as today, which would prevent a new mom from nursing her baby. It was common then under those circumstance to employ a “wet-nurse.”9 A wet-nurse was in fact a lactating woman who would be paid to nurse other peoples babies. When a wet-nurse wasnt available or wasnt financially feasible, babies where fed milks from cows, goats, mares & donkeys.9
During the 19th century wet nursing did fall out of favor. More attention was focused towards trying to find an adequate substitute for mothers milk.8 Cows milk became more of the norm for supplementation due to its ready availability. It was during this time observations were made that infants fed cows milk had a higher mortality rate as well as were more prone to indigestion and dehydration as compared to infants that were breastfed.9
A German scientist in 1838, Johann Franz Simon, published the first biochemical analysis of the nutrient contents of human and cows milk. It served as a basis for formula nutrition science for decades to follow.9 This analysis is actually very similar to modern determinations.19 Simon discovered that cows milk had a higher protein content and lower carbohydrate content than human milk.8 In addition, he believed that the larger curds of cow milk, as compared to the smaller curds of human milk, were responsible for the indigestibility of cows milk.8 Simon was also the first scientist to link estimates of the metabolic rates (energy requirements) of infants and the calorie content of milk.19 He, with the work of others, estimated that infants have a caloric need of 100 calories per kilogram per day during the first few months of life.19 This is remarkably similar to currently estimated requirements.
By 1860, a German chemist, Justus von Leibig, developed the first commercial baby food.9 It was a powdered formula made from wheat flour, cows milk, malt flour and potassium bicarbonate.9 This formula, called Leibigs Soluble Infant Food, was added to heated cows milk. It was the first commercial baby food to be sold in the United States. It sold for $1 per bottle in 1869.9
It was in 1869 that Nestlйs Infant Food, made with malt, cows milk, sugar and wheat flour became available in the United States.4 Its price was $.50 per bottle in 1870.4,9 Nestlйs formula not only contrasted Leibigs Food in terms of price but also was only diluted with water. Because it did not require cows milk to prepare like Leibigs, it became the first complete artificial formula to be available in this country.4,9
Over the next twenty years, several cows milk modifier formulas were introduced. In the 1897 Sears catalogue, there were at least eight brands of commercial infant foods.9 These formulas, despite their wide spread availability, had only modest sales due to the fact that they were expensive in comparison to cows milk.
It was 1929 when the first soy based infant formula was introduced by Mead Johnson Company.33 This innovation was in response to those babies with allergies to cows milk.3
During the 1900s scientists were focused on trying to make advances in creating a more “humanized” formula. Nutrition scientists began focusing on trying to modify carbohydrate, fat, and protein. Vitamins and minerals were also added or balanced. The goal was to make infant formula more closely resemble that of human milk. For example, polyunsaturated vegetable fats were used to replace much of the saturated fats of cows milk. 19
Research in 1912 by E. Mead Johnson, founder of the Mead Johnson Company, produced a cows milk additive called Dextri-Maltose. Dextri-Maltose, based on the malt oligosaccharides (oligosaccharide: any carbohydrate with a few units of simple sugar) used in Europe, was a specialty carbohydrate product as well as the first clinically supported, physician recommended infant formula in the United States.3,19 It was used by hospitals and in homes for sixty years.3
The protein content and quality of formula were a consideration from the 1930s on.27 Early estimates of breast milk protein levels were higher than now known. In addition, it was believed that cow milk protein was greatly inferior to breast milk; a belief that led to very high levels of protein in original formulas (3.3-4.0 g/100kcal). Protein concentrations were lowered as a result; current protein levels in formula average 2.07g/100kcal.3,4,5
Based on recognition that human milk contains a predominance of whey proteins, while in cows milk, caseins are higher, formula with a whey:casein ratio similar to human milk were introduced in 1962.27 The protein quality was changed by replacing some of the casein of cows milk with whey (whey is the watery part of milk that is separated from the coagulated part or curd).19
More recent changes to infant formulas were the adding of taurine in