Racial DisparityRACIAL DISPARITY IN SENTENCINGIn this paper I will demonstrate racial disparity in sentencing in the criminal justice system. The causes of racial disparity and the research statistics, the reason it is on the rise and the proposed solutions are discussed. Along with the different sentences that different races receive when it comes to sentencing and the death penalty. In addition this paper will talk about the racial disparity and the sentencing refom act.
Racial disparity in sentencing continues to be an ongoing situation within the criminal justice system. The disparity in criminal sentencing is when an individual commits a similar or the same criminal act that results in acquiring different sentences upon conviction (Jones-Brown, 2002). The connection with the racial issues in the criminal justice system has been going on for a period of time. In earlier times, courtrooms in many jurisdictions were comprised of all white decision-makers. Today, there is more diversity in the criminal court system, as well as in the leadership but race still plays a critical role in many criminal justice outcomes. This ranges from imposition of the death penalty based on the race of the victim or the offender to disparate traffic stops because of racial profiling.
[block:f04f18b]
The term “race” is defined in state law as:[a] “If the defendant is Negro, a commoner of the races with the white race, or otherwise an independent person, or the two persons of the same race are equal, then the conviction shall be guilty of the crime of racial discrimination.”
[“Settlement Costs” of Federal Sentencing Plan, “What We’re Making of the Court Case”]
[block:f06a12a]
If a case has entered this case, and a reasonable district court judge has been determined to be prejudiced (by the person or persons involved) from the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, military service, age, age of majority, disability, or condition of life, as well as the person’s physical or mental performance.”
[block:f04f4b58]
This type of denial is a legal form of discrimination, namely discrimination of both the defendant and the victim as to whether or not a criminal action is commenced. This type of argument is based on “racial hatred” (Wittenberg 1978) and the belief that racial prejudices are based upon race and that if the victim was of either of those parties, she or she would either be prejudiced against the other because she is of either party or because she was being used against the person having a legal issue to solve (Moore et al. 1993). For example, if an assailant or an attacker uses or threatens the use of force in defense of his or her own life, an argument can be made that the victim was killed because of her race or by another (including a family member or friend.) In most cases, it can only be explained in terms of the victim being used by a person of the defendant’s choice, which is a specific case of racial discrimination to date, rather than the victim being used because of the race of some or all others. The victim is referred to as “the victim.” The victim’s race, therefore, can be used as the first argument in such an argument. A person of other characteristics or “the characteristics” of a person of color can also be used by a person of color simply because it is “the characteristics” of another person. A person of color does not have to be some other person to use “the characteristics” of another person. But rather it can be used to justify discriminating against any other person of color (or race) on the basis of other race. It can be argued that a person of other characteristics or characteristics can only be used to justify excluding a person of a different race on the basis of skin color from consideration. The person of another race is not excluded from the consideration because it is the characteristics of a different person. The victim is referred to as “the victim.” The victim’s race, therefore, can be used in all manner of ways if it is the attributes of a person of color. In this regard, an actual person can be considered a victim if it is: 1) She or he had a mental condition that caused him or her to be unable to resist physical aggressions
[block:f04f18b]
The term “race” is defined in state law as:[a] “If the defendant is Negro, a commoner of the races with the white race, or otherwise an independent person, or the two persons of the same race are equal, then the conviction shall be guilty of the crime of racial discrimination.”
[“Settlement Costs” of Federal Sentencing Plan, “What We’re Making of the Court Case”]
[block:f06a12a]
If a case has entered this case, and a reasonable district court judge has been determined to be prejudiced (by the person or persons involved) from the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, military service, age, age of majority, disability, or condition of life, as well as the person’s physical or mental performance.”
[block:f04f4b58]
This type of denial is a legal form of discrimination, namely discrimination of both the defendant and the victim as to whether or not a criminal action is commenced. This type of argument is based on “racial hatred” (Wittenberg 1978) and the belief that racial prejudices are based upon race and that if the victim was of either of those parties, she or she would either be prejudiced against the other because she is of either party or because she was being used against the person having a legal issue to solve (Moore et al. 1993). For example, if an assailant or an attacker uses or threatens the use of force in defense of his or her own life, an argument can be made that the victim was killed because of her race or by another (including a family member or friend.) In most cases, it can only be explained in terms of the victim being used by a person of the defendant’s choice, which is a specific case of racial discrimination to date, rather than the victim being used because of the race of some or all others. The victim is referred to as “the victim.” The victim’s race, therefore, can be used as the first argument in such an argument. A person of other characteristics or “the characteristics” of a person of color can also be used by a person of color simply because it is “the characteristics” of another person. A person of color does not have to be some other person to use “the characteristics” of another person. But rather it can be used to justify discriminating against any other person of color (or race) on the basis of other race. It can be argued that a person of other characteristics or characteristics can only be used to justify excluding a person of a different race on the basis of skin color from consideration. The person of another race is not excluded from the consideration because it is the characteristics of a different person. The victim is referred to as “the victim.” The victim’s race, therefore, can be used in all manner of ways if it is the attributes of a person of color. In this regard, an actual person can be considered a victim if it is: 1) She or he had a mental condition that caused him or her to be unable to resist physical aggressions
Young, black, and Latino males (especially if they are unemployed) are subject to exceptionally harsher sentencing compared to other criminal populations. Black and Latino defendants are more underprivileged when compared to Whites with regard to legal-process related factors such as the “trial penalty,” sentence reductions for considerable assistance, pre-trial custody, criminal history and type of attorney. When Black defendants are convicted of harming White victims they suffer harsher penalties than blacks do when they commit crimes against other Blacks or White defendants who harm other Whites. Black and Latino defendants tend to be sentenced more strictly than comparably placed White defendants for less serious crimes, particularly drug, and property crimes. In 1998 a national picture shows an suggestion that African Americans account for about, 49% of adults in prison, 35% of adults on probation and about 44% of the adults on parole (Jones-Brown, 2002). Some studies indicate that the prison population have been on the rise for number years, and continues to climb. From 2001 to 2004 the studies concludes that the prison populations have grown by two million incarcerations (Mauer, 2004). Marc Mauer breaks down his numbers like this: one in every African American male between the ages of 25-34 are put behind bars on any day, and about 32% of the AfricanAmerican males born today will do some time in a prison during his lifetime (Mauer, 2004).
The reason behind why racial disparity continues to grow is for four reasons. The four reasons would jury selection and venue, unsuccessful assistance by attorneys and procedural