American Censorship: The Real StoryEssay Preview: American Censorship: The Real StoryReport this essayAmerican Censorship: The Real StoryWhen the United States Constitution was originally signed, September 17, 1787, it did not include clauses designed to protect our essential freedoms. In fact, this fatal flaw of the Constitution to guarantee these rights made it the most frequently debated historical document of its time. While the framers of our constitution did not see the necessity in formally declaring these rights, they quickly realized they would receive no peace until they were legally declared before the nation. This was the birth of the Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution, ratified December 15, 1791. Among these was the right to Free Speech, a right that of recent has been all but stripped from the hands of the American citizenry while the government cites its own indelible duty to censor what is viewed or heard by the general public.
The Constitutional Law of 1787 The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, under the First Amendment, protects not only freedoms of speech and expression, but also constitutional government, which is about to embark on a massive legal program in violation of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. This legal act took place during the New Hampshire campaign in what was once part of New Hampshire Territory, just southeast of Plymouth County, the United States territory that is now New Hampshire. The New Hampshire Citizens Action League, the largest independent group fighting the illegal “American Censorship Act,” brought a special resolution urging New Hampshire government to “stop this government from taking in and using the citizens, not just of the United States, the opportunity to speak their minds.” In one instance, the government was allegedly using a private organization, the Society of American Chiefs of Police, to engage in “the exercise of a government action and force an occupation, which is not a right the American people have,” and thus being “unjustified, unconstitutional, and unconstitutional.” In an effort to “establish proper, equal, and adequate government,” the resolution urged people to “fight in the courts, on the ground, in every state and assembly; to resist the abuses of tyrannies, to defend civil liberties which are based upon the basic rights of all of our people.” Many of the protests in Massachusetts and Massachusetts, where “Congress in no wise regulates a business under that authority,” were apparently prompted the resolution. Despite the government’s claims that there wasn’t enough law on the books to enact such an expansive legal program, however, no one in Massachusetts or New Hampshire felt their government was actually violating the First Amendment. In all of these protests, government officials tried to suppress the peaceful and peaceful activity of the citizens of Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Massachusetts by using state-supported anti-government demonstrators to disrupt a government-sponsored parade in Plymouth, Massachusetts, in front of the town’s mayor’s house and many other business buildings. There was a similar attempt after the demonstration against the New Hampshire State Legislature in November 2011. At the time, one of its leaders, a state senator said, “It will make the government of the state all sorts of government. Every person. I want to watch all this go over again. . . . Nobody needs to be killed. . . . Nobody needs to be arrested. Nobody needs to be arrested.”
The National Counterfeit Perception Program The Counterfeit Patriot Act, signed into law last legislative session in July 2010, prohibits any person who “is a member of the United States or has a lawful basis to believe in, or has knowingly provided material support for, a terrorist organization or its support, or in aid of the hostilities in Yemen.” The law only applies to “any individual who, directly or indirectly, has engaged in, sponsored, authorized, sponsored, aided, or otherwise aided the commission of any violent or criminal act,” and only those who have been convicted of felony conspiracy or have engaged in a criminal conspiracy against the United States have any right to have any such criminal case prosecuted or dismissed.
Uranium, Terrorism, War
On February 24, 2010, the National Counterfeit Perception Program (CVE) sent to the United States the first order in which the US government would conduct its intelligence and legal counterfeits with regards to “the alleged Iran-Contra/D-NII affair, the alleged Iranian involvement in the nuclear negotiations and the apparent war in Afghanistan.” The program also included the following items: “The United States government’s plan to develop its national energy supply system through the use of energy technologies known as ‘Energy Information Systems.” This project included the use of “energy technologies as weapons of mass destruction.”
[NOTE: The term ‘Energy Information System’ in this document refers to the “energy system” or ‘system’ of a power grid
Our minds are presented with images daily. Some are good, some bad, but most are just subtle enough that we dont even recognize the fact that we have just internalized a message. This flaw in our ability to recognize these messages has been taken advantage of since the founding of this nation.
Everything we view on television, be it network or cable television, has been carefully screened. Nothing has made it to the air waves by pure coincidence or circumstance. The media is a carefully filtered, powerful tool. Although the first acts of censorship in America were subtle, in recent years we have become much more blatant in abusing the constitutionally guaranteed right to free speech. Whereas it was made formally illegal to bar the citizenry from protesting unfair practices in government, during the civil rights movement, the government allowed police brutality, lynchings, and other forms of domestic terrorism, to prevent protestors from further changing their carefully constructed society. When this affect did not last, they begin too filter the radio and television broadcasts. Journalists were told what they could and could not report on the programs. Some were even forced to tell lies in order to force compliance upon the citizenry.
Even in 2006, we are still not being told the entire truth about what is happening behind the scenes of our government. Take for instance Flight 93, the jumbo jet that mysteriously crashed over a field September 11, 2001. Witnesses over a 10 mile radius, agreed to seeing a unidentified military jet shoot down the commercial airliner over and empty field, only to speed off in the opposite direction