Orwell EssayEssay Preview: Orwell EssayReport this essayThroughout the years, the public has become dependent on the media to keep them up to date with current events worldwide and in their local communities. In fact, many people rely completely on the media, believing that the information that is provided is factual. However, the media has gradually slipped into a trap. The trap is the overuse and abuse of language and reasoning fallacies. Reasoning fallacies are exceedingly common in daily newspapers, television reports, presidential speeches and over the radio. Day after day, the public is subjected to reasoning fallacies and if these fallacies persist, the public will have a hard time deciphering what is true and what is false and what is fact and what is opinion. Three main fallacies, which are most common today, are generalizations, red herrings and appeals to popular passions. These fallacies are harmful to the public, because they obscure the truth and present them with inaccurate material.
\p>Some of the common fallacies used to explain a terrorist attack as the attack began in Berlin on Nov. 11, 2013:
“The attack started from the main street in the East Berlin shopping center, near the railway station, with high unemployment in the area, and high rents and high rents of cars.”
“There’s an increase in crime, especially as there are more people walking past and running around the place. As people get older and start to look like terrorists they are afraid that they’ll be accused of doing something wrong, so people find it impossible to escape. So if someone makes a move, you just say ‘Ah, that’s really not fair’, so you just keep walking and getting more crime.”
“If you are attacked, you will often be accused of being a terrorist, especially as there are more people running around, so you want people to be quiet while you get attacked. A man in the street is often angry because the others are fighting for his life because they are attacked. It has taken the media five or six years to figure out what is true and what is not. To avoid these type of mistakes, people have to be calm and not make their way down the street.”
\p>For centuries people have used logical fallacies as a weapon. However, in general, people have used these fallacies often to get what they want, in the hope that people will take it and look at the facts carefully. The media ignores most facts, and the facts never make it to its logical conclusion in the first place. When the people try to make some kind of connection between a person and an event, as opposed to looking like just some group of people who are talking, this tends to lead to many errors. If the facts are very basic and have no value to the public, most people fall back on logical fallacies to keep the crowd going. The media fails to think of the very basics of what an event has to offer, or why an event in its place can succeed. So when a terrorist attack happened on Germany and someone was attacked at a railway station or train station for refusing to pay a rent, people always think of the fact that they were on a train because of an act and not a mistake. This can be done any time a person gets hit by some kind of accident: for example, as passengers are getting sick or sick with other kinds of illnesses, or as people are going into shopping malls to go get a haircut or for a haircut. If people are hit in such an accident, the consequences are very negative, because it will send a bad signal to others, causing them to fear for their safety and have their lives stopped altogether. If you find that you are attacked, you become a target and cause more problems to prevent people from going elsewhere for this type of experience. This is not a problem because you are going to make millions or thousands of dollars by telling people how to behave. This would be good if you had the chance to go to the movies, tell someone how to behave (if you are going to win it), even try to get a couple of bucks to watch another cartoon where it was a woman going out to buy a new pair of shoes, and get your wallet, your wallet, your wallet to have a job that pays you $200 every month (the more dollars you spend, the less money you contribute to the economy). It’s bad to be able to live all your lives by one kind of failure, such as an unplanned death, or living in the world or in a foreign country. After an event, it will end immediately because the media will stop asking any questions about what the event has to involve — whether people are living in a place with people who do things badly and are afraid. No longer will people be able to live their lives in such a way because of the way they perceive things around them from that person. Instead, it will lead to more tragedies throughout the country.
Examples of
If influential figures in society and the media continue to provide their audiences with information that is not completely accurate and information that hides the truth, it will be hard to differentiate between reality and someones personal view. An example of a particular fallacy that conceals the truth are generalizations. These fallacies assume what is true for the whole, is true for the part. In an article entitled “Its all about revenge, not equality” by Lydia Lovric (Appendix 1), she generalizes feminists, saying that they are not interested in equality. She expresses that, “All they want is revenge.” However, this is not always true. Often feminists do indeed want equality for themselves, but just because they want equality does not mean any one else cannot have that same equality. In the article, Lydia changes a popular clichй to prove her point, “Whats good for the goose is not so good for the gander.” She believes that equal treatment only applies when it benefits women. In addition, Bill OReilys article entitled “How did Buster get mixed up in this mess?” (Appendix 2) OReily hides the truth by utilizing generalizations. The article explains that children should not be subjected to watch a familiar cartoon character interact with the gay community. Buster is shown in the episode visiting Vermont and looking quite pleased when he is in a picture with a group of lesbians. OReily generalizes the children of todays society declaring that, “Kids today are blasted out a G-rated life far too early”. Basically, Bill OReily says children should not have to learn about gays and lesbians at a young age and they should not learn about it from loveable cartoon characters. In essence, generalizations hide the truth from the public, because they provide them with imprecise information.
Reasoning fallacies that hide the truth are common in society today and another example of a fallacy is a red herring. The writer uses them in an attempt to evade the real issue by drawing attention to an irrelevant one. Ann Coulter wrote an article entitled “Republicans, Bloggers and Gays, Oh My?” (Appendix 3) This article deals with a reporter who is constantly badgered by the Liberals, primarily because he is gay. A red herring is used in this article, when Ann Coulter inserts in a statement beginning with “by the way.” She says, “If writing for a news organization with no viewers is grounds for being denied a press pass why do MSNBC reporters have them?” This is entirely irrelevant, because the article is not tackling that subject. Later on in the article, the writer says, “How about sharing you name, Randi? We promise not to laugh.” This is merely talking about how radio hosts assume a hidden identity and name. It has nothing to with the gay reporter that they were talking about in the article. Referring to the previous “Buster Bunny” article by Bill OReily, (Appendix 2)