Eng 106 – the Bill of Rights: A Look InsideThe Bill of Rights: A Look Inside.DAngelo TolbertAmerican Intercontinental UniversityENGL106-1101B-246 English Composition IMary-Catherine Ferguson24 March 2011AbstractIn the research the Bill of Rights we will try to break down the meaning of the Bill of Rights. We will explore some of the origins of where this document came from. In the course of the paper we look at the importance of the Bill of Rights to the American people. We will discuss why the Bill of Right was adopted to the American Constitution.
The Bill of Rights a Look InsideAs American we honor our history, traditions and Freedoms. This nation was started by colonist who felt they were not being treated fairly by the government that represented at the time. Wanting to break away for the tyranny of England the American people our Fore-Fathers did not want to trade one bad form of government for another. Many people know though the Constitution greatly written did not ensure that the Government would not abuse its new power to oppress the people of the land. The people demanded that amendment s be added to the Constitution to ensure the rights of the people would not be infringed upon by the federal government. On September 25, 1789 the first ten amendments which are known as the Bill of Rights were introduced to Congress by Thomas Jefferson. For generations many have argued the principles of what is the Bill of Rights? Today we will find out. We will take an in-depth look into what the Bill of Rights are? Where did the Idea of the bill of Rights come from? Who was the bill of Right written for? Why were they written? Looking at the answers to these questions we may be able to put to rest some of the myths of our Bill of Rights.
The biggest and the most important question we have to ask are; what exactly is the Bill of Rights? The Bill of Rights is defined as a formal summary of those rights and liberties considered essential to a people or group of people Looking at the US Bill of Rights it is further broken down as series of limitations of power held by the United States federal government, protecting the natural rights of liberty and property of the citizens of the United States (Monk, 2000. ). These first set of Amendment to our constitution were set up in a way to ensure that the right of the common man would not be pressed upon by the Federal Government. It also limited the federal government involvement in matters that were delegated to the state and local magistrates.as we
In contrast, the Canadian Bill of Rights, was a compromise that was used in Canada to resolve this longstanding federal conflict (Coulter and Toguro 2014). It was passed by a majority in parliament in a parliamentary body composed of the federal parliament (the Canadian Constitution) and members from other legal branches of the Canadian government. The Canadian Congress was created in 1768 (the Canada Constitution) and consists both of the Canadian Government, the Canadian legislature, and an elected and appointed representative from each of Canada’s six provinces. The Canadian Constitution provides for a central legislative body that administers legislation, rules of procedure, and the law. The Canadian legislature provides for a central administrative body within this body. The Canadian legislature has two members elected from among the people of Canada, representatives of all political parties, and the general right of the peoples to decide what is law. The CPA is an umbrella bill of rights consisting of all forms of “intelligible law” (Article IV) (Coulter and Toguro) that are not merely arbitrary; they often have an “intelligible effect” (The Constitution 2017.5). These laws and statutes include the freedom to use, possess, and carry on the trade, manufacture, transportation, and use of any article whatsoever including tobacco, cosmetics, medicine, and cosmetics, while permitting the ownership of land, water, and air rights.
To address the fact that Canada’s constitution is not an international agreement that is binding worldwide, the Canadian Confederation of Manitoba, the United Kingdom of Great Britain, Italy, and Spain have all made it clear that, upon the request of the Canadian government, the right to self-determination be enshrined in Canadian Constitutions.
The Canadian Bill of Rights has been the subject of many discussions in Parliament and in Canada over the past two decades. It was eventually passed into law by Parliament and has been amended to permit the Canadian government to amend our existing government.
At the very present time, Canadian rights for indigenous people and a range of other Peoples are being violated, whether they be property rights, cultural and educational rights, privacy rights (due process rights); or even the right to defend themselves in law. The Canadian Constitution gives the government the authority to decide the fate of a Nation. The Canadian government has made it clear that if the Canadian courts are able to determine that the person or Peoples is in breach of this fundamental right, then this will be the case.
However, in a country of 100 states, the fundamental right of persons to self-determination does not exist. Moreover, the Canadian government does not have authority to issue Canadian laws which are incompatible with the Constitution. Moreover, if the Canadian government does intend to restrict an indigenous person’s right of self-determination, it could revoke the right to possess or transport a canoe or other recreational vessel and it could also stop a government regulation that is contrary to this Constitution and is incompatible with it.
In addition, the Canadian government has created a law that requires the government to provide all new