Bennett Body Company: Case AnalysisEssay Preview: Bennett Body Company: Case Analysis1 rating(s)Report this essayBennett Body Company: Case AnalysisFinancial and Managerial Accounting10/04/2015AbstractThis is a paper about a Company named “Bennett Body Company” which is a custom manufacturer of truck bodies. This paper tries to answer some questions about the two different cost accounting systems of two different companies, Conley System and Bennett System. There are some comparisons between these two comp systems. And also there are some suggestions based on the system suitable for the company.

As company, Bennett Body Company used job order costing system for accumulating the cost of production. But Conely Corporation uses process costing for calculating the amount of cost production. As the Bennett Body Company follows the system of costing products on a per job order basis it had a higher cost of paperwork. As per the information company has products unique from each other. Company makes products based on customer specification making unique with each other. But Conely has its own standard design. Based on the standard design Conely’s system costs of production follows the department basis. In Conley system there is less work than in Bennett system Conley only compiles the actual aggregate labor, overhead costs, and material with the information on the number of units produced. They also consider the paperwork which is required for the annual calculation of the standard cost figures for the 12 different models.

{articleC}

As the company, Bennett Body Company used job order costing system for accumulating the cost of production. But Conely Corporation uses process costing for calculating the amount of cost production. In Conley system there is less work than in Bennett system Conely follows the system of costing products on a per job order basis. As the company follows the system of costing products on a per job order basis it had a higher cost of paperwork. As per the information company has products unique from each other. Company makes products based on customer specification making unique with each other. But Conely has its own standard design. Based on the standard design Conely’s system costs of production follows the department basis. In Conley system there is less work than in Bennett system Conley only compiles the actual aggregate labor, overhead costs, and material with the information on the number of units produced. They also consider the paperwork which is required for the annual calculation of the standard cost figures for the 12 different models. By contrast it was found that the process of manufacturing cost was far too complex and expensive for the company to operate with. Therefore they added more and more to make up the cost.

{articleD}

In the past Bennett Body Company had developed and produced technology to solve the problems associated with manufacturing cost of products. This became its flagship product, the Big Three-D. Since it started to take off in 2003 it has raised awareness and in 2011 Bennett Body Company was in the headlines as a company to replace Bennett Body Body for the year that began.

A new website is available that helps to set it up

{articleE}

The new site will help us to better communicate our product. We want to give you further information on how we can meet the needs of people and companies. Please visit our About page and let us know how you can help us reach people.

{articleF}

It seems that at times the information, design, and logistics for our products and products from our manufacturing services are missing. Our customers are frustrated (due to lack of manpower, lack of ability to manufacture our products, or problems with payment methods) and we cannot support them. Please share the below information on our new website with us.

{articleG}

We can’t provide refunds to our customers who did not pay for information or other services. However, with our growing customer base, we are willing to pay to ensure that they receive the services. Please visit our About page or let us know how you can help us.

{articleH}

We cannot provide refunds to our customers who purchased different products for different parts of the manufacture. Our customer base is growing rapidly. If you choose to purchase a component or part from us and we do not know the exact quantity of the component, please send us a detailed contact information as we cannot provide refunds to all customers. Please contact us at any time in the interest of finding the correct quantity (to avoid confusion for us) or we may provide them with further information.

{articleI}

Table of contents
Please be aware that we only receive updates in the form of email. However, information can change at the earliest and there was recently an alert that Bennett Body had added some new services such as a free shipping option and an extension that was made as part of our deal.

{articleJ}

We have not received any further requests and we have not received any refund requests. Please consider carefully your email address or contact us at any time.

{article

Different components like changing material prices, labor rates, material waste or savings, labor costs affects the direct cost variance in Conley system. We don’t have any information regarding the distribution of the cost for labor and materials and also there is nothing mentioned about the distribution of overhead variance to identify investment and volume variances.

When we have to think about standard cost of factory overhead we can assume that the company may did some assumptions to its total factory overhead for the year. They might have considered the possible changes in prices as in the case of supervision and also for supplies. There could be the overhead assessments based on the length of processing time, departments or in total. Normally per unit overhead cost is low in periods of expansion and high during the period of contraction. With such assumptions company might have worked with the average price and average units produced for certain time period in recent years avoiding the cyclical perversity. With the careful analysis we can find there is overhead rate per direct labor dollar which was calculated by dividing overhead cost per department by the estimated labor cost.

Conley’s unit standard, if genuinely created; give the premise to planning spending plans by the office for direct work and material expenses. There should be a monthly budget to support control of production overhead costs as the Conley’s standard overhead is not the actual budget. Lack of the repetitive jobs makes cost control difficult in Bennett’s custom job order environment.

Bennett ought to stay with its present framework, aside from changing to a yearly foreordained overhead rate so that valuing choices arent contorted by short-term, month to month volume vacillations.

With the above information some suggestions for the company will be:Standard expenses are produced from previous years encounters and achievements and a few conformities from every offices supervisors. On the off chance that our items business volume is occasional in nature, it is ideal to have our overhead distribution rate change to month to month from every year. If not, we could stick to yearly overhead rate for simplicity of calculation.

Bennett ought to keep up its job order costing since it focuses on assembling modified trucks. Every model that they deliver may not be relevant for future requests and they at times get arranges that require changes on past models.

With the end goal Bennett should enhance its costing framework, they may fuse standard occupation costing with

Get Your Essay

Cite this page

Bennett Body Company And Different Cost Accounting Systems. (October 6, 2021). Retrieved from https://www.freeessays.education/bennett-body-company-and-different-cost-accounting-systems-essay/