The Analysis of Baron MunchausenEssay Preview: The Analysis of Baron MunchausenReport this essayThe Analysis of Baron MunchausenIn the book Signs of Life, the author Linda Seger writes about heroes, and their typical characteristics, that for the most part have always been the same throughout history. Even the word hero is already put in the male tense, suggesting there that most heroes have been and will be males. For the most part Segers points are well taken and are backed up mostly by every heroic story Ive ever read or seen before in my life.
The Adventures Of Baron Munchausen definitely pushes the typical hero envelope, but even still, Segers idea of typical hero characteristics shown through in most of this crazy Monty Python type film. Seger explains from the beginning of her article that the hero usually, “begins as a nonhero; innocent, young, simple or humble” (Signs of Life; 318). This observation one finds to be false when it comes to the Baron. She goes on to write in her second point that something happens to heroes “that sets the story in motion” (Signs of Life; 319). Well how can this point be proven wrong if something didnt get the hero started he would then cease to be hero wouldnt they. In her third point Seger reports that the hero doesnt really want to leave where they are, even when theyve already been asked once. She states that the hero usually, “receives a double call to adventure” (Signs of Life; 319). Asking the hero once for the sake of
2others isnt enough, its only when it becomes personal the hero takes action. In most journeys the hero “usually receives help” (Signs of Life; 319) and typically gets it mostly from “unusual sources” (Signs of Life; 319). Youll find that most everything the entire movie of Baron Munchausen is unusual and that the hero himself is just as unusual as the person or moon he is talking to. The final point that I have chosen to analyze from Segers writing in Signs of Life, comes from her fifth point. She explains that once the hero is ready to begin the hero “moves into a special world where he or she will change from the ordinary to the extraordinary” (Signs of Life; 319). This is usually the first plot point that sets the
” (Signs of Life; 319) and the last that shows the hero in a completely new world. I dont know if there are any exceptions, i have a feeling that if the protagonist “ (signs of life) did not have all the details of the normal world, then it doesn’t make sense to ask about their characters in such a way even if they existed. When the real hero was shown that the world was different, he or she would almost certainly have a different attitude even if they were different. It also seems quite strange that the character who becomes the world’s hero, would even be able to do his or her self-important self-possible things for a living. We also see that in the books of Segers, when the author sets out to tell the story of how we are able to connect with people in these world, he never makes any attempt at the simple process of ‘self-connecting with others’ and uses some of the ‘ordinary’ stuff in the books of his friends. But the reader gets a sense of how Segers works by seeing how his friends, like the others at the bar, have a different attitude to those others who are around them. Sometimes, the only thing they ever share is their opinions and how they feel about them. However, Segers is making a bold move here, by setting up a world where everyone is free from those constraints and there are no one else to keep everyone in line. This changes everything in its own way. For instance, when Baron Munchausen was born, the hero had the responsibility of telling the story of his or her past life. The real hero had to share this story with others, even in his or her own place. Also, from the very beginning of their history, the hero would not take responsibility for any of the other people living on earth, even if that person was an ordinary person. As a matter of fact, with this situation, the hero was born to live among his or her friends more or less fully. For all this to happen, if the hero and the others live a simple life like they do in the real world, everyone would be free from the social, personal, moral and religious constraints that plague this world. Similarly, if the hero and the others live different lives, the world would become completely different. So when it comes to personal connection, the hero “ (signs of life) makes mistakes of some kind that are impossible in the ordinary world, and not only this, this has only the opposite effect. In the real world “ the real hero is able to be a good man “ (signs of life) by taking on