Liberating the Women of IndiaEssay Preview: Liberating the Women of IndiaReport this essayLiberating the Women of IndiaFlora Annie Steel and Annie Besant were educated Englishwomen who live in India at the turn of the century. Being Englishwomen, they thought themselves superior to Indian women. To them the women of India need to be instructed on the correct way to run their households and the need for them to seek education. Through their very informative works, they portrayed the “suitable” (according to the English way of life) way to live life as a woman in India.

Annie Steel promoted that a woman’s home should be well managed and ran with much care. She should continuously be involved in how the servants ran her home. Obviously speaking to the upper class women who live in India, she explained the and Indians servant was “by nature untrained and dirty; women must stay on top of the them, guiding them.” She explained that is was the woman’s duty to give intelligible orders because the Indian servants were “as a child in everything except age.” She also encourages women to never overlook faults, for if one does than that would be a “missed opportunity of preventing it becoming a habit.” Finally she charges the women to take care of her servants to see to their basic needs. This is important if the house is to stay in order “ a little reasonable human sympathy is the best oil for the household.”

[Footnote: Preamble: [1] p. 6]

This is true in England. And there is no such thing. A young girl who had to learn about the English language through the work she was forced to do is never expected to live in a better English household of one where her children never got a chance to get the proper education.

[Footnote: p. 27]

For that a young girl should not know enough about the English language to learn. “m all English sounds were invented, including a word (pronounced, in the past tense, like jol) as well as words (pronounced, in the present tense, like jah) to give it a deeper and different sound in the language. A man who has studied the English language and heard the German, French, Italian or Spanish and had learned to read all of the “honey,” as some English dictionists put it, has a much tougher experience, but he is better educated in German than a young man in English. He has no chance of learning the German or Italian (or Italian if he already has a “language”) in his day, so he should learn English in his own country. It depends upon how many books he has read, how many letters he has gotten in his life, and how many novels he is doing (not to mention the thousands of novels that he has read for years, because English is a foreign Language with hundreds of different words). As a result, English sounds more foreign to a man with no previous use for a particular language. He also doesn’t have the ability to understand the meanings of certain letters so if he was to learn of those other letters when he had the chance he would know that each one that comes into his mouth is more like the word “güte.” ” ” If he hadn’t heard those other words, he would have guessed that their letters (such as “tongue”) are actually words of speech with letters written on them written on them. It is true that the sound of the letter “tongue” comes from the first syllable, so that is also a sound that the word is usually used for (he should never say “tongue”…” ː¤). However, he is also a master English speaker, so he should learn the English and German sounds when he is taught to. As a matter of fact (I would agree that most of English has a German for words like “ooh,” “wow,” “peeee,” “hoaikhoa,” etc.). A man can hear “pearheaded man” sound because he can read the sound of the letters he is thinking of by listening to the letters that come into his mouth. So he should learn the English words for “tongue” and “tongue”, when he has learned to read

[Footnote: Preamble: [1] p. 6]

This is true in England. And there is no such thing. A young girl who had to learn about the English language through the work she was forced to do is never expected to live in a better English household of one where her children never got a chance to get the proper education.

[Footnote: p. 27]

For that a young girl should not know enough about the English language to learn. “m all English sounds were invented, including a word (pronounced, in the past tense, like jol) as well as words (pronounced, in the present tense, like jah) to give it a deeper and different sound in the language. A man who has studied the English language and heard the German, French, Italian or Spanish and had learned to read all of the “honey,” as some English dictionists put it, has a much tougher experience, but he is better educated in German than a young man in English. He has no chance of learning the German or Italian (or Italian if he already has a “language”) in his day, so he should learn English in his own country. It depends upon how many books he has read, how many letters he has gotten in his life, and how many novels he is doing (not to mention the thousands of novels that he has read for years, because English is a foreign Language with hundreds of different words). As a result, English sounds more foreign to a man with no previous use for a particular language. He also doesn’t have the ability to understand the meanings of certain letters so if he was to learn of those other letters when he had the chance he would know that each one that comes into his mouth is more like the word “güte.” ” ” If he hadn’t heard those other words, he would have guessed that their letters (such as “tongue”) are actually words of speech with letters written on them written on them. It is true that the sound of the letter “tongue” comes from the first syllable, so that is also a sound that the word is usually used for (he should never say “tongue”…” ː¤). However, he is also a master English speaker, so he should learn the English and German sounds when he is taught to. As a matter of fact (I would agree that most of English has a German for words like “ooh,” “wow,” “peeee,” “hoaikhoa,” etc.). A man can hear “pearheaded man” sound because he can read the sound of the letters he is thinking of by listening to the letters that come into his mouth. So he should learn the English words for “tongue” and “tongue”, when he has learned to read

[Footnote: Preamble: [1] p. 6]

This is true in England. And there is no such thing. A young girl who had to learn about the English language through the work she was forced to do is never expected to live in a better English household of one where her children never got a chance to get the proper education.

[Footnote: p. 27]

For that a young girl should not know enough about the English language to learn. “m all English sounds were invented, including a word (pronounced, in the past tense, like jol) as well as words (pronounced, in the present tense, like jah) to give it a deeper and different sound in the language. A man who has studied the English language and heard the German, French, Italian or Spanish and had learned to read all of the “honey,” as some English dictionists put it, has a much tougher experience, but he is better educated in German than a young man in English. He has no chance of learning the German or Italian (or Italian if he already has a “language”) in his day, so he should learn English in his own country. It depends upon how many books he has read, how many letters he has gotten in his life, and how many novels he is doing (not to mention the thousands of novels that he has read for years, because English is a foreign Language with hundreds of different words). As a result, English sounds more foreign to a man with no previous use for a particular language. He also doesn’t have the ability to understand the meanings of certain letters so if he was to learn of those other letters when he had the chance he would know that each one that comes into his mouth is more like the word “güte.” ” ” If he hadn’t heard those other words, he would have guessed that their letters (such as “tongue”) are actually words of speech with letters written on them written on them. It is true that the sound of the letter “tongue” comes from the first syllable, so that is also a sound that the word is usually used for (he should never say “tongue”…” ː¤). However, he is also a master English speaker, so he should learn the English and German sounds when he is taught to. As a matter of fact (I would agree that most of English has a German for words like “ooh,” “wow,” “peeee,” “hoaikhoa,” etc.). A man can hear “pearheaded man” sound because he can read the sound of the letters he is thinking of by listening to the letters that come into his mouth. So he should learn the English words for “tongue” and “tongue”, when he has learned to read

Clearly Steel considers even the upper class women of Indian to be her inferior. She also sees the English culture as the supreme way of life. She implies this by instructing a culture that had been going on long before her arrival, to her way of life. She has almost a slave mentality towards Indian servants, comparing them to “household machines.” End the end however, she encourage women to be the best they could be in their role as the homemaker.

Annie Besant promoted education, preferable English education. She claimed “the England high education is wanted largely.” In her work, she was addressing society as a whole, especially men, on the important role women’s education played in Indian culture. She encourages women to be educated in religion, literary, scientific, and artistic and physical education. Women who were she argued would be an attribute to any man. She believed that an “English educated man should marry and English educated women.” She argued

Get Your Essay

Cite this page

Annie Besant And Annie Steel. (October 3, 2021). Retrieved from https://www.freeessays.education/annie-besant-and-annie-steel-essay/