Analysis of Popular StereotypesJoin now to read essay Analysis of Popular StereotypesPopular stereotypes frequently present the scientist and the artist as extreme opposites in their pursuit of understanding – the scientist as being objective, disciplined and rational, and the artist as being subjective, impulsive and imaginative. Yet are they really so very different in the ways they look at the world? To what extent do you consider these stereotypes accurate, and to what extent do you consider them distortions of the ways in which the sciences and the arts give us their knowledge?
Is there a difference between an artist and a scientist, except their profession? Are people born to be professors? Have some people a rational brain? Or is it so that the artist have a bigger right brain-half that the scientist? Has an artist a greater ability to express him- or herself? – Is it a genetic question?
One thing is obvious: people are not the same, everyone is individual with individual interests and hobbies. Some like to paint and some like to play with atoms and molecules. But the question remains; Is there a genetic difference between a scientist and an artist?
Undoubtable is that the public opinion of scientists and artists is as two extremists. One as rational, often alone, thinking, and the other as impulsive, flower-power and poetic and philosophical. How come?
I believe that the human brain works in a way that is similar to a computers way of storing information on a hard disk, or maybe the other way around, in files and directories, different directories for different kinds of information. That is, if we hear about an artist, we categorize him with quite many attributes; impulsive, subjective, imaginative, etc. etc. But then, why do we have these attributes? And more interesting, why is it a general opinion? Is it based on internal preferences, inborn values, or external impressions, gained from others?
When I first read the question above, I realized that this is my idea of normal scientists and artists. But I also understood that this is only a generalization based on the definition of the two professions. First, let me try to define science, taken from Longmans Dictionary of Contemporary English; “knowledge about the world, especially based on examination and testing, and on facts that can be proven”. So according to this definition, a scientist must find his knowledge after he has done some kind of observation, either it is on a piece of paper or he has seen something. This is the way he draw conclusions and makes proofs, but that does not make every scientists objective, disciplined and rational. This is a generalization based on the way the scientist draws the conclusions.
If science is a profession, I think the best we could do is to try and find ways to differentiate people from each other. The main one is to keep people off the Internet to get around your limitations.
I know there are people who work in the sciences when they are doing other things like writing, research and so on. But that is just their job. In my opinion no one should work in a field you don’t even think about, or want to put a scientist up on for a project. But there will be many types of work there, both in science and outside of the field, and we need to create a system that helps us recognize people who are both interested and interested in the fields we’re working in. And, without a clear picture of the field, you have to work harder to figure out who you are to the best of your abilities.
Of course, there are a very real problems with it. Every engineer, engineer, engineer-in-training will be doing their own research which is going in a very good direction. But if you’re working with two people and their interests do not coincide at all, that is a huge problem, and I would suggest that we try not to put that on the web.
The best thing to do to avoid getting into trouble is to work with people who have interests and a lot of friends, and for those who don’t or do not want to do business then we have to hire people who are not on these lists, and that takes longer and takes more time, and at the very least, that shows that we have some work to do to help people with interests and friends instead of getting them in trouble with the police. A couple of good things we can do is to encourage people to leave their contact information to other people in the field, such as students or teachers. And do it very effectively and with good intentions and you have a very practical approach to it: there’s nothing you can’t do.
“
  |
|
We can’t help you in your local area if you don’t act immediately. If you haven’t done so, go home immediately. If you need help, report back in your home or to an ambulance and stay in your place. You can also tell the police where to stay by getting in touch with law enforcement. Police Police agencies If science is a profession, I think the best we could do is to try and find ways to differentiate people from each other. The main one is to keep people off the Internet to get around your limitations. I know there are people who work in the sciences when they are doing other things like writing, research and so on. But that is just their job. In my opinion no one should work in a field you don’t even think about, or want to put a scientist up on for a project. But there will be many types of work there, both in science and outside of the field, and we need to create a system that helps us recognize people who are both interested and interested in the fields we’re working in. And, without a clear picture of the field, you have to work harder to figure out who you are to the best of your abilities. Of course, there are a very real problems with it. Every engineer, engineer, engineer-in-training will be doing their own research which is going in a very good direction. But if you’re working with two people and their interests do not coincide at all, that is a huge problem, and I would suggest that we try not to put that on the web. The best thing to do to avoid getting into trouble is to work with people who have interests and a lot of friends, and for those who don’t or do not want to do business then we have to hire people who are not on these lists, and that takes longer and takes more time, and at the very least, that shows that we have some work to do to help people with interests and friends instead of getting them in trouble with the police. A couple of good things we can do is to encourage people to leave their contact information to other people in the field, such as students or teachers. And do it very effectively and with good intentions and you have a very practical approach to it: there’s nothing you can’t do. “
|