Business StrategiesEssay Preview: Business StrategiesReport this essayMcDonald’s corporation is one of the American multinational companies whose preference is a weak dollar. As far as the company is concerned, a surge in the United States dollar is seemingly a threat to them as this will stand to crimp the demand for the exports and this will typically reduce the value of the overseas sales when these sales are translated into the United States dollars. A strong dollar as far as this company is concerned means that they will be operating at losses (Laure, 2015). The company sells its products on an international market and when much of operations are done in overseas countries such as Europe, and the euro is stronger than the dollar, this will transpire into the company profits being denominated into the euros and upon conversion to the weak dollar, eventually, there will be more profits for McDonald’s (Laure, 2015). When considering the fair Federal Reserve policy, the McDonald’s shares rose and its gains also increased with a 2% increase in profits as a result of the conversion of the dollar against other rather strong currencies such as the euro and the British dollar (Sherri, 2003).
The company is also at the stage of rebuilding their products, and for this case, they sell more products than any other company in this food and beverage industry but despite this, they have increasingly suffered from changes in the consumer preferences and thus, a weak dollar may ensure that their overseas operations are ploughing in back increased profits for the company (Sherri, 2003).
Question twoIn this case, the winners of the agreement will the Trump’s son. This is attributed from the fact that he will have diversified into an overseas country and for this case, this will bring more profits into the United States economy. Additionally, the stone business that will be revitalized in the process will also stand to benefit the son that will be aided by the highway through which he will easily transport his exports as well as having a local concentrated market. The losers in the case will be the Palestinians. This is due to the fact that despite the production operations being conducted on their soil, they will benefit only from taxes as with the cheap way of exportation. The local consumption will be consequently minimum and for this case, they will be just facing a depletion of their resources.
The Palestinians, in addition to the benefits, will be benefiting from the fact that after the divorce of Jerusalem and they had a land in both, the land they wanted and the security they had was moved between the new Palestine and Jerusalem.
However, as with all the other agreements signed so far, the Trump Administration has not yet confirmed the terms of the agreement. However, as has been noted previously by this Committee, the new agreement will bring an increase in oil and gas exports by 40% compared to the original plan. The United States now has no intention of paying $1 billion a year for additional oil- and gas transportation for the Palestinians so it is likely that the Palestinian Authority will not be able to meet its energy demands or meet this year’s demand, thus the American market will be limited.
This is primarily for political reasons, but for now, it is important for the Trump Administration at this point to take a “very strong line” on economic reforms, including the lifting of the American embargo on the Palestinian economy, which could also create jobs.
In addition, as with all previous agreements signed for the Palestinian territories, the Palestinian Authority has already been under a freeze for a long time, which has allowed them to move much of their energy production offshore while providing more flexibility and lower prices. Under the deal reached with Jordan, it is already possible that an Iranian or a Chinese firm could be at the negotiating table at the end of the day.
Therefore, the American negotiators have proposed a more significant reduction in the current $600 billion that could be put to work with the other nations, and there is no sense that the new deal will do much to alleviate the suffering caused by the past.
In addition, it seems like the new agreement would not add as much of a buffer zone to the current status quo in the Middle East so it would create more opportunities for American business with this area. It makes sense to have a more expansive trade policy and more extensive development agenda in this region, as a result of the lifting of the restrictions. However, it does not seem likely that even if the Palestinians wanted more flexibility in international dealings, they would not be able to work with the United States at this time.
In addition, because of the agreement, the United States will no longer be able to control its supply of natural gas and oil and it will cease to be able to trade with the West Bank and with all of its major economic neighbors (primarily the Israeli) while maintaining an open border with the Palestinians. In an increasingly congested environment, America will be unable to maintain the position it is in without the involvement of Israeli companies. All of these factors could lead to more conflict rather than better relationship between the United States and the Palestinians if the Trump Administration chooses to sign the deals. As a consequence, the Palestinians could very well get the best of both worlds in the future.
Finally, Trump’s executive action on sanctions on Iran is not yet in place and as is well known, the US will have to decide whether or not to comply with the new sanctions in order to defend itself against an attack. For now its only option would entail imposing other sanctions, most notably on its financial and other related institutions, and the United States cannot be certain about this
The Palestinians, in addition to the benefits, will be benefiting from the fact that after the divorce of Jerusalem and they had a land in both, the land they wanted and the security they had was moved between the new Palestine and Jerusalem.
However, as with all the other agreements signed so far, the Trump Administration has not yet confirmed the terms of the agreement. However, as has been noted previously by this Committee, the new agreement will bring an increase in oil and gas exports by 40% compared to the original plan. The United States now has no intention of paying $1 billion a year for additional oil- and gas transportation for the Palestinians so it is likely that the Palestinian Authority will not be able to meet its energy demands or meet this year’s demand, thus the American market will be limited.
This is primarily for political reasons, but for now, it is important for the Trump Administration at this point to take a “very strong line” on economic reforms, including the lifting of the American embargo on the Palestinian economy, which could also create jobs.
In addition, as with all previous agreements signed for the Palestinian territories, the Palestinian Authority has already been under a freeze for a long time, which has allowed them to move much of their energy production offshore while providing more flexibility and lower prices. Under the deal reached with Jordan, it is already possible that an Iranian or a Chinese firm could be at the negotiating table at the end of the day.
Therefore, the American negotiators have proposed a more significant reduction in the current $600 billion that could be put to work with the other nations, and there is no sense that the new deal will do much to alleviate the suffering caused by the past.
In addition, it seems like the new agreement would not add as much of a buffer zone to the current status quo in the Middle East so it would create more opportunities for American business with this area. It makes sense to have a more expansive trade policy and more extensive development agenda in this region, as a result of the lifting of the restrictions. However, it does not seem likely that even if the Palestinians wanted more flexibility in international dealings, they would not be able to work with the United States at this time.
In addition, because of the agreement, the United States will no longer be able to control its supply of natural gas and oil and it will cease to be able to trade with the West Bank and with all of its major economic neighbors (primarily the Israeli) while maintaining an open border with the Palestinians. In an increasingly congested environment, America will be unable to maintain the position it is in without the involvement of Israeli companies. All of these factors could lead to more conflict rather than better relationship between the United States and the Palestinians if the Trump Administration chooses to sign the deals. As a consequence, the Palestinians could very well get the best of both worlds in the future.
Finally, Trump’s executive action on sanctions on Iran is not yet in place and as is well known, the US will have to decide whether or not to comply with the new sanctions in order to defend itself against an attack. For now its only option would entail imposing other sanctions, most notably on its financial and other related institutions, and the United States cannot be certain about this
This deal is good for the Palestine. This is due to the fact that thy will be having a constant supply of the materials when they need them. The Israel government will also benefit from this deal as through the construction of the industries, this will boost the economy of the country. Additionally, the export highway they will construct will increase marketing activities and in the long run this will boost the economy of the country. For Eric, this is considerably a good investment, he will have benefited from a ready market as well as a reliable means of exportation