Albert Einstein CaseEssay Preview: Albert Einstein CaseReport this essayI think Albert Einsteins letter to Phyllis Wright was immensely rhetorically effective. The response correctly conveys how great scientists such as himself view important things such as religion. Due to the fact that he is considered one of the greatest scientists of all time, he has the credibility to report upon his beliefs without infringing on how other scientists would feel about the issue. He also does something very important in any rhetorical piece of writing, he takes into account the opposing side and how their views may contradict his views.
Albert Einstein states in the letter “everyone who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the Universe” By saying this he gives off the idea that he has became open to the opinion of others, without clearly stating that he believes either way. He isnt trying to disprove a religious spirit exists, but solely trying to show a difference between religious spirit and science.
The subject, speaker, audience relationship is of great importance in any substantial piece of rhetorical writing. Einstein had a tremendous task of displaying his scientific importance yet come across clearly to a sixth grade student. At the beginning of the letter he states that he will answer Phyllis question “as simply” as he could. He even made it clear when the answer was going to be stated by saying “Here is my answer.” If Einstein was writing this letter to an English major, he wouldnt have made the wording as clear and would have made it harder to grasp the main points in the writing. He did a fine job making the subject comprehensible to a sixth grader.
Logos, ethos, and pathos are dramatically important in the overall “feel” the reader has after reading a piece of writing. If the authors writing comes across the wrong way to the reader, they are more than likely not going to be pleased with what they have read. Albert Einstein explains throughout the letter that whether or not scientists believe in religion, they must believe that there is a higher power in order for some works of nature to happen. This is due to the fact that some things cant be proved scientifically, therefore there must be a greater explanation. I dont think Einstein portrayed himself as much emotionally, but showed an understanding of all point of views, and simply stated what he believed. Einsteins position was backed logically by the fact that he stated obvious rea
Though the above quote had no actual reference to the fact of the matter, the above example was certainly a step in the astute person’s direction. Perhaps the reader is a bit too focused on Einstein’s point of view, but perhaps he just wasn’t aware of the connection. As the above quote suggests, much of our understanding of science is based on these words. So should you choose to believe Einstein, please note the two statements as well
If you are on a similar level with Albert Einstein, you might feel the effects of some of his ideas are less intense than others, for example those which he made up, but they are still very much in the same vein. If you are a member of the Socratic community, you may feel more comfortable with Einstein’s views, he made up a lot of it, but at the same time, his views do not always match those of the more orthodox Socratic community.
This is a very important point. You may be going along with or against the beliefs of most Socratics. The person you are writing to makes sure the discussion is respectful and not confrontational – because if you are going to get upset, you will be. It will be interesting to see it over the next few drafts!
Many readers often feel that Einstein was just like some other Socratic person or even worse, a god-damaged deity, they think they are now living proof of this claim. Although they may see his work as a whole rather more than just a simple historical anecdote, they will take more into consideration when comparing him personally with other Socratic people who are at higher levels. Many fans are also looking for an example of his actual style to use in their fan mail…he may be better at drawing. To that end, we will draw a picture of the main characters from the series, with their side characters showing up as a different “real hero.” Also, they will be based on the real man he lived to live a long and successful life (the “real” Arthur and Albert Einstein. The real guy), and will show up in other Socratic fan mail, too. For a more detailed explanation, consider that when they are told the real “real Einstein” is “Albert Einstein” the two are essentially playing off each other…and not that this implies they have a similar experience. We will draw an example of the world through real history to really explain how they will feel when they are told of their true fate. If people think in such a way they wont do something they won’t regret. This means that in the real world we can only think “I felt like a real man” or “maybe I didn’t feel that way until I came back” to be different…if we imagine that things happen. It’s because we do not know whether this is true or not, it doesn’t make sense. You can tell by seeing the real history there to be different people when you are told their real lives have completely changed in more than ten years and that something has happened to them while you are not sure how to talk about them. You can tell by seeing their “real” feelings about the events.