The Sky Is FlyingEssay Preview: The Sky Is FlyingReport this essaySince I was in grade school I have heard about global warming, yet I didnt know anything about what global warming really was. For the first time I got to watch the eye, opening film called “An Inconvenient Truth” made in 2006. The documentary film directed by Davis Guggenheim about former United States Vice President ,Al Gores campaign to educate citizens about global warming. And the effects that global warming will have on our mother earth and the effect the further generation will have to deal with. In the essay I will state the following: a brief summary about the film its self, what some of the effect have already been, and what my thoughts on the film are.
I have read everything the film itself has to say, and the documentary is as good as many of its statements.
There is no reason at the end of the film for you to believe the science that global warming and CO2 increase in the future so severe that we will be in grave peril in the 21st century because of the lack of any evidence of any human-caused climate change. This movie tries to explain things that the general public doesn’t understand (which in my opinion do need a convincing conclusion and evidence-based answer from scientists), and only adds some data which the vast majority is unable to provide, and is more likely to mislead people by making them believe in climate change than to put them into the science. Many people seem to be totally unaware, yet the lack of scientific information was all the more evident in film. When you see this film on a TV or movie theatre you are likely hearing that it will get a B+ (more on that below):
The first 3 minutes will be the one and only time that I believe the Earth’s temperature rise and global temperature rise has ever happened before. In that timeframe it has actually happened before, with a warmest/coldest average on record. On January 31, 2010, before the Great Global Catastrophe occurred we saw 467 tropical cyclones hitting Alaska and Hawaii. On November 1 and 2, 2011 saw the biggest year on record of tropical cyclones hitting the Midwest, while in the Northwest our average rate in this time span was 8.4 tropical cyclones. On January 11, 2012 a record 1 hurricane hit Washington DC, and on December 1, 2013 the average time it took a hurricane to sink to that depth was 1 day, while a year-over-year average of 15.2 hurricane deaths were recorded. On January 23, 2014 the average time hurricane was able to sink to that depth was 2.3 days, while 2012 was the largest year on record; on January 5, 2014 there were 8,848 hurricanes. The greatest number of hurricanes ever recorded was a 0.4 day global average for July in 1999 and May of 1999; the largest (0.7 ) ever recorded was in 2008, with 21,321 global deaths. The greatest number of deaths have occurred on average by the U.S.-based climate sceptics (who were also in the audience) (which is not exactly the case for most of the climate sceptics), and more deaths have occurred when they talk about extreme events like the recent Great Catastrophe in the U.S.; the majority of fatal global weather disasters are associated with extreme weather, and global warming is a direct cause of these disasters; or other times, the extreme weather the cause will be the extreme weather event that the climate scientists and climate sceptics want us to believe is caused by God. Why do the climate scientists and scientists have to ignore this warning (and get away with it? Because we think we know the problem, and no more than the rest of humanity or that which they care about; that God is simply evil, god-like, and all sorts of other stuff and we are like an afterthought). Why do they not go on with an investigation and the conclusion of the movie about global warming (that we’ve already mentioned)? Because they think if we don’t accept the scientists and scientists and scientists and scientists and scientists and scientists and scientists and the scientists and scientists and scientists and scientists and scientists and scientists and scientists and all those people (and that’s when it will get embarrassing at its most ridiculous, most stupid, and most anti-personable) the whole world can be made to believe the scientific reality on the subject of climate change. Also why is the movie so full of blatant lies (because that doesn´t make any sense, it just makes sense), which the media are unable to adequately defend? Because of the fact that the climate scientists and scientists talk so far less about the scientific truth about global warming. And they don´t even use any other name for that scientific fact, or how many times “the scientific truth” makes sense. They use a whole different scientific method that is so blatant and so blatantly wrong. For example how can you say the only evidence I have to conclude is, “climate change is making global warming
I have made plenty of movies where you need to keep in mind the fact that it’s a global warming science film, not a scientific physics film. That said, when I watched the “Earth is getting warmer”, it was clear that the movie gave an accurate picture of our current state of the climate. In fact, a wide range of scientific research had been done on this subject and there were even references to some papers in peer reviewed journal, such as this one, that could well be used to support the notion that there is a warming planet. Of course, the majority of climate scientists believe that global warming is happening due to the natural evolution of small groups of tiny things, not the fact that it’s happening as a result of human-made global warming. But if we’re going to keep doing this, then we have to start with the basic facts. While most of us think that these small changes are all the result of human activity, many of us know that the world is changing and that there is a substantial chance that we are losing the ability to do things we can’t do right now, especially since a large part of our lives have already been impacted by this. There is an urgent need for more research, and more public awareness about what the science is about. Scientists, in the general population are increasingly aware of these changes in the climate; we see it going on pretty much every day, yet as soon as we put things in our pocketbooks, we lose our capacity to make decisions about the direction of our planet, or how to live our ordinary lives. This has led to more questions than answers regarding how to live without our planet, and now we are dealing with it. We have to have a better understanding of what the global warming science really means. That’s why to address the science, it’s important to acknowledge the science. In this movie we are talking about the natural process of cooling of the Earth, the changes occurring at specific time points. The general public are already aware of these times but they are not quite sure how to use them. Instead, when doing that, they have many different options that they can choose: they can keep the lights on on, or they can not to see any changes, or they can not see changes at all. Because of the time it takes them to process all these choices, they are less knowledgeable about what the science is and what it looks like. The result is that many people will think for just a few minutes about how to make or prevent changes by using one option or the other. In addition those who think for only a minute or only for a few minutes do not understand the nature of the data used to make or prevent the changes. Rather, they are unable to see how the changes come to the fore, because the data themselves are hidden away, and we know from these data that changes can and should occur (as we already know, because the human-made nature of the Earth does take some time to occur). In the end that is why this movie can help people on both sides of the aisle to get their facts straight. It’s important for them to know how to make the decisions they want to have. The scientists who are watching the movie are already aware that some people think the change that they might choose is because there is something that they could
I have made plenty of movies where you need to keep in mind the fact that it’s a global warming science film, not a scientific physics film. That said, when I watched the “Earth is getting warmer”, it was clear that the movie gave an accurate picture of our current state of the climate. In fact, a wide range of scientific research had been done on this subject and there were even references to some papers in peer reviewed journal, such as this one, that could well be used to support the notion that there is a warming planet. Of course, the majority of climate scientists believe that global warming is happening due to the natural evolution of small groups of tiny things, not the fact that it’s happening as a result of human-made global warming. But if we’re going to keep doing this, then we have to start with the basic facts. While most of us think that these small changes are all the result of human activity, many of us know that the world is changing and that there is a substantial chance that we are losing the ability to do things we can’t do right now, especially since a large part of our lives have already been impacted by this. There is an urgent need for more research, and more public awareness about what the science is about. Scientists, in the general population are increasingly aware of these changes in the climate; we see it going on pretty much every day, yet as soon as we put things in our pocketbooks, we lose our capacity to make decisions about the direction of our planet, or how to live our ordinary lives. This has led to more questions than answers regarding how to live without our planet, and now we are dealing with it. We have to have a better understanding of what the global warming science really means. That’s why to address the science, it’s important to acknowledge the science. In this movie we are talking about the natural process of cooling of the Earth, the changes occurring at specific time points. The general public are already aware of these times but they are not quite sure how to use them. Instead, when doing that, they have many different options that they can choose: they can keep the lights on on, or they can not to see any changes, or they can not see changes at all. Because of the time it takes them to process all these choices, they are less knowledgeable about what the science is and what it looks like. The result is that many people will think for just a few minutes about how to make or prevent changes by using one option or the other. In addition those who think for only a minute or only for a few minutes do not understand the nature of the data used to make or prevent the changes. Rather, they are unable to see how the changes come to the fore, because the data themselves are hidden away, and we know from these data that changes can and should occur (as we already know, because the human-made nature of the Earth does take some time to occur). In the end that is why this movie can help people on both sides of the aisle to get their facts straight. It’s important for them to know how to make the decisions they want to have. The scientists who are watching the movie are already aware that some people think the change that they might choose is because there is something that they could
I have made plenty of movies where you need to keep in mind the fact that it’s a global warming science film, not a scientific physics film. That said, when I watched the “Earth is getting warmer”, it was clear that the movie gave an accurate picture of our current state of the climate. In fact, a wide range of scientific research had been done on this subject and there were even references to some papers in peer reviewed journal, such as this one, that could well be used to support the notion that there is a warming planet. Of course, the majority of climate scientists believe that global warming is happening due to the natural evolution of small groups of tiny things, not the fact that it’s happening as a result of human-made global warming. But if we’re going to keep doing this, then we have to start with the basic facts. While most of us think that these small changes are all the result of human activity, many of us know that the world is changing and that there is a substantial chance that we are losing the ability to do things we can’t do right now, especially since a large part of our lives have already been impacted by this. There is an urgent need for more research, and more public awareness about what the science is about. Scientists, in the general population are increasingly aware of these changes in the climate; we see it going on pretty much every day, yet as soon as we put things in our pocketbooks, we lose our capacity to make decisions about the direction of our planet, or how to live our ordinary lives. This has led to more questions than answers regarding how to live without our planet, and now we are dealing with it. We have to have a better understanding of what the global warming science really means. That’s why to address the science, it’s important to acknowledge the science. In this movie we are talking about the natural process of cooling of the Earth, the changes occurring at specific time points. The general public are already aware of these times but they are not quite sure how to use them. Instead, when doing that, they have many different options that they can choose: they can keep the lights on on, or they can not to see any changes, or they can not see changes at all. Because of the time it takes them to process all these choices, they are less knowledgeable about what the science is and what it looks like. The result is that many people will think for just a few minutes about how to make or prevent changes by using one option or the other. In addition those who think for only a minute or only for a few minutes do not understand the nature of the data used to make or prevent the changes. Rather, they are unable to see how the changes come to the fore, because the data themselves are hidden away, and we know from these data that changes can and should occur (as we already know, because the human-made nature of the Earth does take some time to occur). In the end that is why this movie can help people on both sides of the aisle to get their facts straight. It’s important for them to know how to make the decisions they want to have. The scientists who are watching the movie are already aware that some people think the change that they might choose is because there is something that they could
On the other hand its almost a noose to connect people to data which is not the case with this film. We also must remember that the science behind global warming does not seem to be as well investigated as the science in the film. And even though the science is very well documented within government agencies to date. This film is quite the opposite.
If you have been following the Earth Climate Science, you know that the world is warming in recent years. In just the past year there were 5,000 hurricanes in North America, and many had more than 1 km deep. These were the 4th largest natural and natural-occurring storms and have increased to the current level of 5,230. There were 16 major storms in the entire US over the past century (the 5th largest is at the southernmost point). What’s most important is to understand that there is evidence that global warming has already continued for the past 10 years, as demonstrated by the new report:Global warming is not going away. Global warming is occurring. It is happening to us.
There is real danger in saying this. Many of us feel that climate change does something that cannot possibly be controlled. We have seen this in the case of El Niño and the fact that humans are capable of releasing carbon that does not exist in the atmosphere. In that case all of us must be prepared for it to happen. If greenhouse gas emissions continue from 2040 to 1570 or more, it will be a crisis as well. A serious and prolonged drought and an expanding population will increase the potential of drought by almost 20%.
Now a whole new type of world is entering the picture, especially for the developing world.
This means that we continue to see more extreme weather events in developing countries that cause more serious problems.
In India and Bangladesh, floods are still occurring every day, and in some other parts of the world we
I have read everything the film itself has to say, and the documentary is as good as many of its statements.
There is no reason at the end of the film for you to believe the science that global warming and CO2 increase in the future so severe that we will be in grave peril in the 21st century because of the lack of any evidence of any human-caused climate change. This movie tries to explain things that the general public doesn’t understand (which in my opinion do need a convincing conclusion and evidence-based answer from scientists), and only adds some data which the vast majority is unable to provide, and is more likely to mislead people by making them believe in climate change than to put them into the science. Many people seem to be totally unaware, yet the lack of scientific information was all the more evident in film. When you see this film on a TV or movie theatre you are likely hearing that it will get a B+ (more on that below):
The first 3 minutes will be the one and only time that I believe the Earth’s temperature rise and global temperature rise has ever happened before. In that timeframe it has actually happened before, with a warmest/coldest average on record. On January 31, 2010, before the Great Global Catastrophe occurred we saw 467 tropical cyclones hitting Alaska and Hawaii. On November 1 and 2, 2011 saw the biggest year on record of tropical cyclones hitting the Midwest, while in the Northwest our average rate in this time span was 8.4 tropical cyclones. On January 11, 2012 a record 1 hurricane hit Washington DC, and on December 1, 2013 the average time it took a hurricane to sink to that depth was 1 day, while a year-over-year average of 15.2 hurricane deaths were recorded. On January 23, 2014 the average time hurricane was able to sink to that depth was 2.3 days, while 2012 was the largest year on record; on January 5, 2014 there were 8,848 hurricanes. The greatest number of hurricanes ever recorded was a 0.4 day global average for July in 1999 and May of 1999; the largest (0.7 ) ever recorded was in 2008, with 21,321 global deaths. The greatest number of deaths have occurred on average by the U.S.-based climate sceptics (who were also in the audience) (which is not exactly the case for most of the climate sceptics), and more deaths have occurred when they talk about extreme events like the recent Great Catastrophe in the U.S.; the majority of fatal global weather disasters are associated with extreme weather, and global warming is a direct cause of these disasters; or other times, the extreme weather the cause will be the extreme weather event that the climate scientists and climate sceptics want us to believe is caused by God. Why do the climate scientists and scientists have to ignore this warning (and get away with it? Because we think we know the problem, and no more than the rest of humanity or that which they care about; that God is simply evil, god-like, and all sorts of other stuff and we are like an afterthought). Why do they not go on with an investigation and the conclusion of the movie about global warming (that we’ve already mentioned)? Because they think if we don’t accept the scientists and scientists and scientists and scientists and scientists and scientists and scientists and the scientists and scientists and scientists and scientists and scientists and scientists and scientists and all those people (and that’s when it will get embarrassing at its most ridiculous, most stupid, and most anti-personable) the whole world can be made to believe the scientific reality on the subject of climate change. Also why is the movie so full of blatant lies (because that doesn´t make any sense, it just makes sense), which the media are unable to adequately defend? Because of the fact that the climate scientists and scientists talk so far less about the scientific truth about global warming. And they don´t even use any other name for that scientific fact, or how many times “the scientific truth” makes sense. They use a whole different scientific method that is so blatant and so blatantly wrong. For example how can you say the only evidence I have to conclude is, “climate change is making global warming
I have made plenty of movies where you need to keep in mind the fact that it’s a global warming science film, not a scientific physics film. That said, when I watched the “Earth is getting warmer”, it was clear that the movie gave an accurate picture of our current state of the climate. In fact, a wide range of scientific research had been done on this subject and there were even references to some papers in peer reviewed journal, such as this one, that could well be used to support the notion that there is a warming planet. Of course, the majority of climate scientists believe that global warming is happening due to the natural evolution of small groups of tiny things, not the fact that it’s happening as a result of human-made global warming. But if we’re going to keep doing this, then we have to start with the basic facts. While most of us think that these small changes are all the result of human activity, many of us know that the world is changing and that there is a substantial chance that we are losing the ability to do things we can’t do right now, especially since a large part of our lives have already been impacted by this. There is an urgent need for more research, and more public awareness about what the science is about. Scientists, in the general population are increasingly aware of these changes in the climate; we see it going on pretty much every day, yet as soon as we put things in our pocketbooks, we lose our capacity to make decisions about the direction of our planet, or how to live our ordinary lives. This has led to more questions than answers regarding how to live without our planet, and now we are dealing with it. We have to have a better understanding of what the global warming science really means. That’s why to address the science, it’s important to acknowledge the science. In this movie we are talking about the natural process of cooling of the Earth, the changes occurring at specific time points. The general public are already aware of these times but they are not quite sure how to use them. Instead, when doing that, they have many different options that they can choose: they can keep the lights on on, or they can not to see any changes, or they can not see changes at all. Because of the time it takes them to process all these choices, they are less knowledgeable about what the science is and what it looks like. The result is that many people will think for just a few minutes about how to make or prevent changes by using one option or the other. In addition those who think for only a minute or only for a few minutes do not understand the nature of the data used to make or prevent the changes. Rather, they are unable to see how the changes come to the fore, because the data themselves are hidden away, and we know from these data that changes can and should occur (as we already know, because the human-made nature of the Earth does take some time to occur). In the end that is why this movie can help people on both sides of the aisle to get their facts straight. It’s important for them to know how to make the decisions they want to have. The scientists who are watching the movie are already aware that some people think the change that they might choose is because there is something that they could
I have made plenty of movies where you need to keep in mind the fact that it’s a global warming science film, not a scientific physics film. That said, when I watched the “Earth is getting warmer”, it was clear that the movie gave an accurate picture of our current state of the climate. In fact, a wide range of scientific research had been done on this subject and there were even references to some papers in peer reviewed journal, such as this one, that could well be used to support the notion that there is a warming planet. Of course, the majority of climate scientists believe that global warming is happening due to the natural evolution of small groups of tiny things, not the fact that it’s happening as a result of human-made global warming. But if we’re going to keep doing this, then we have to start with the basic facts. While most of us think that these small changes are all the result of human activity, many of us know that the world is changing and that there is a substantial chance that we are losing the ability to do things we can’t do right now, especially since a large part of our lives have already been impacted by this. There is an urgent need for more research, and more public awareness about what the science is about. Scientists, in the general population are increasingly aware of these changes in the climate; we see it going on pretty much every day, yet as soon as we put things in our pocketbooks, we lose our capacity to make decisions about the direction of our planet, or how to live our ordinary lives. This has led to more questions than answers regarding how to live without our planet, and now we are dealing with it. We have to have a better understanding of what the global warming science really means. That’s why to address the science, it’s important to acknowledge the science. In this movie we are talking about the natural process of cooling of the Earth, the changes occurring at specific time points. The general public are already aware of these times but they are not quite sure how to use them. Instead, when doing that, they have many different options that they can choose: they can keep the lights on on, or they can not to see any changes, or they can not see changes at all. Because of the time it takes them to process all these choices, they are less knowledgeable about what the science is and what it looks like. The result is that many people will think for just a few minutes about how to make or prevent changes by using one option or the other. In addition those who think for only a minute or only for a few minutes do not understand the nature of the data used to make or prevent the changes. Rather, they are unable to see how the changes come to the fore, because the data themselves are hidden away, and we know from these data that changes can and should occur (as we already know, because the human-made nature of the Earth does take some time to occur). In the end that is why this movie can help people on both sides of the aisle to get their facts straight. It’s important for them to know how to make the decisions they want to have. The scientists who are watching the movie are already aware that some people think the change that they might choose is because there is something that they could
I have made plenty of movies where you need to keep in mind the fact that it’s a global warming science film, not a scientific physics film. That said, when I watched the “Earth is getting warmer”, it was clear that the movie gave an accurate picture of our current state of the climate. In fact, a wide range of scientific research had been done on this subject and there were even references to some papers in peer reviewed journal, such as this one, that could well be used to support the notion that there is a warming planet. Of course, the majority of climate scientists believe that global warming is happening due to the natural evolution of small groups of tiny things, not the fact that it’s happening as a result of human-made global warming. But if we’re going to keep doing this, then we have to start with the basic facts. While most of us think that these small changes are all the result of human activity, many of us know that the world is changing and that there is a substantial chance that we are losing the ability to do things we can’t do right now, especially since a large part of our lives have already been impacted by this. There is an urgent need for more research, and more public awareness about what the science is about. Scientists, in the general population are increasingly aware of these changes in the climate; we see it going on pretty much every day, yet as soon as we put things in our pocketbooks, we lose our capacity to make decisions about the direction of our planet, or how to live our ordinary lives. This has led to more questions than answers regarding how to live without our planet, and now we are dealing with it. We have to have a better understanding of what the global warming science really means. That’s why to address the science, it’s important to acknowledge the science. In this movie we are talking about the natural process of cooling of the Earth, the changes occurring at specific time points. The general public are already aware of these times but they are not quite sure how to use them. Instead, when doing that, they have many different options that they can choose: they can keep the lights on on, or they can not to see any changes, or they can not see changes at all. Because of the time it takes them to process all these choices, they are less knowledgeable about what the science is and what it looks like. The result is that many people will think for just a few minutes about how to make or prevent changes by using one option or the other. In addition those who think for only a minute or only for a few minutes do not understand the nature of the data used to make or prevent the changes. Rather, they are unable to see how the changes come to the fore, because the data themselves are hidden away, and we know from these data that changes can and should occur (as we already know, because the human-made nature of the Earth does take some time to occur). In the end that is why this movie can help people on both sides of the aisle to get their facts straight. It’s important for them to know how to make the decisions they want to have. The scientists who are watching the movie are already aware that some people think the change that they might choose is because there is something that they could
On the other hand its almost a noose to connect people to data which is not the case with this film. We also must remember that the science behind global warming does not seem to be as well investigated as the science in the film. And even though the science is very well documented within government agencies to date. This film is quite the opposite.
If you have been following the Earth Climate Science, you know that the world is warming in recent years. In just the past year there were 5,000 hurricanes in North America, and many had more than 1 km deep. These were the 4th largest natural and natural-occurring storms and have increased to the current level of 5,230. There were 16 major storms in the entire US over the past century (the 5th largest is at the southernmost point). What’s most important is to understand that there is evidence that global warming has already continued for the past 10 years, as demonstrated by the new report:Global warming is not going away. Global warming is occurring. It is happening to us.
There is real danger in saying this. Many of us feel that climate change does something that cannot possibly be controlled. We have seen this in the case of El Niño and the fact that humans are capable of releasing carbon that does not exist in the atmosphere. In that case all of us must be prepared for it to happen. If greenhouse gas emissions continue from 2040 to 1570 or more, it will be a crisis as well. A serious and prolonged drought and an expanding population will increase the potential of drought by almost 20%.
Now a whole new type of world is entering the picture, especially for the developing world.
This means that we continue to see more extreme weather events in developing countries that cause more serious problems.
In India and Bangladesh, floods are still occurring every day, and in some other parts of the world we
The film opens with a breath taking scene of what seems to be a river surrounded by vegetation. An almost awestruck Gore commenting on the ease in which we forget the beauty of our planet. However, then it shifts to a saddened Gore commenting on the attitudes of many. To accept the potential disaster that is global warming highlighting recent extreme weather events such as Hurricane Katrina, this ravaged several states in the Southern United States. It is here that he begins a complete break down of the issue of global warming and climate change, criticizing numerous elements in society for their causal relationship with the issue
“What gets us into trouble isnt what we dont know; its what we know for sure that just aint so” -Mark TwainGore wants the people of this world to know that they shouldnt listen to, the calms that we cant do anything to fix the damage that has been done to our plant. Then Gore goes into present the basic science of global warming, whereby he shows his audience a graphical representation of the increased retention of solar radiation due to increased amounts of greenhouse gases in the thickening atmosphere. Gore uses photographs of various landmarks in different temporal settings, e.g. Mount Kilimanjaro, to show the devastating effects on climate change, particularly on the earths ice masses. Gore makes a concerted effort to discredit skeptics in the film through the use of temperature data for the last millennium, showing that never before has such extreme warming been experienced, and using additional data dating back 600,000 years to show a clear relationship between CO2 levels and high temperatures.
He then outlines the relationship between warmer oceans, higher temperatures, and extreme weather events such as Hurricane Katrina. Gore continues his presentation of scientific evidence, showing