Pope Pius Xii and the JewsEssay Preview: Pope Pius Xii and the JewsReport this essayThe twentieth century was marked by genocides on an monstrous scale. One of the most terrible was the Holocaust wrought by Nazi Germany, which killed an estimated six million European Jews and almost as many other victims.
During this dark time, the Catholic Church was shepherded by Pope Pius XII, who proved himself an untiring foe of the Nazis, determined to save as many Jewish lives as he could. Yet today Pius XII gets almost no credit for his actions before or during the war.
Anti-Catholic author Dave Hunt writes, “The Vatican had no excuse for its Nazi partnership or for its continued commendation of Hitler on the one hand and its thunderous silence regarding the Jewish question on the other hand. . . . [The popes] continued in the alliance with Hitler until the end of the war, reaping hundreds of millions of dollars in payments from the Nazi government to the Vatican.”[1]
Jack Chick, infamous for his anti-Catholic comic books, tells us in Smokescreens, “When World War II ended, the Vatican had egg all over its face. Pope Pius XII, after building the Nazi war machine, saw Hitler losing his battle against Russia, and he immediately jumped to the other side when he saw the handwriting on the wall. . . . Pope Pius XII should have stood before the judges in Nuremberg. His war crimes were worthy of death.”[2]
One is tempted simply to dismiss these accusations, so wildly out of touch with reality, as the deluded ravings of persons with no sense of historical truth. This would underestimate the power of such erroneous charges to influence people: Many take these writers at their word.
Stepping out of the nightmare fantasyland of Hunt and Chick and back into sunlight of the real world, we discover that, not only was Pius XII no friend of the Nazis, but that his opposition to them began years before the War, before he was elected to the papacy, when he was still Cardinal Eugenio Pacelli, the Vatican Secretary of State.
On April 28, 1935, four years before the War even started, Pacelli gave a speech that aroused the attention of the world press. Speaking to an audience of 250,000 pilgrims in Lourdes, France, the future Pius XII stated that the Nazis “are in reality only miserable plagiarists who dress up old errors with new tinsel. It does not make any difference whether they flock to the banners of social revolution, whether they are guided by a false concept of the world and of life, or whether they are possessed by the superstition of a race and blood cult.”[3] It was talks like this, in addition to private remarks and numerous notes of protest that Pacelli sent to Berlin in his capacity as Vatican Secretary of State, that earned him a reputation as an enemy of the Nazi party.
The Germans were likewise displeased with the reigning pontiff, Pius XI, who showed himself to be a unrelenting opponent of the new German “ideals”–even writing an entire encyclical, Mit Brennender Sorge (1937), to condemn them. When Pius XI died in 1939, the Nazis abhorred the prospect that Pacelli might be elected his successor.
Dr. Joseph Lichten, a Polish Jew who served as a diplomat and later an official of the Jewish Anti-Defamation League of Bnai Brith, writes: “Pacelli had obviously established his position clearly, for the Fascist governments of both Italy and Germany spoke out vigorously against the possibility of his election to succeed Pius XI in March of 1939, though the cardinal secretary of state had served as papal nuncio in Germany from 1917 to 1929. . . . The day after his election, the Berlin Morgenpost said: The election of cardinal Pacelli is not accepted with favor in Germany because he was always opposed to Nazism and practically determined the policies of the Vatican under his predecessor. “[4]
Former Israeli diplomat and now Orthodox Jewish Rabbi Pinchas Lapide states that Pius XI “had good reason to make Pacelli the architect of his anti-Nazi policy. Of the forty-four speeches which the Nuncio Pacelli had made on German soil between 1917 and 1929, at least forty contained attacks on Nazism or condemnations of Hitlers doctrines. . . . Pacelli, who never met the FĂ‘Ĺ’hrer, called it neo-Paganism. “[5]
A few weeks after Pacelli was elected pope, the German Reichs Chief Security Service issued a then-secret report on the new Pope. Rabbi Lapide provides an excerpt:
“Pacelli has already made himself prominent by his attacks on National Socialism during his tenure as Cardinal Secretary of State, a fact which earned him the hearty approval of the Democratic States during the papal elections. . . . How much Pacelli is celebrated as an ally of the Democracies is especially emphasized in the French Press.”[6]
Unfortunately, joy in the election of a strong pope who would continue Pius XIs defiance of the Nazis was darkened by the ominous political developments in Europe. War finally came on September 1, 1939, when German troops overran Poland. Two days later Britain and France declared war on Germany.
Early in 1940, Hitler made an attempt to prevent the new Pope from maintaining the anti-Nazi stance he had taken before his election. He sent his underling, Joachim von Ribbentrop, to try to dissuade Pius XII from following his predecessors policies. “Von Ribbentrop, granted a formal audience on March 11, 1940, went into a lengthy harangue on the invincibility of the Third Reich, the inevitability of a Nazi victory, and the futility of papal alignment with the enemies of the FĂ‘Ĺ’hrer. Pius XII heard von Ribbentrop out politely and impassively. Then he opened an enormous ledger on his desk and, in his perfect German, began to recite a catalogue of the persecutions inflicted by the Third Reich in Poland, listing the date, place, and precise details of each crime. The audience was terminated; the Popes position was clearly unshakable.”[7]
”„Sebastian Halske, who is now a minister at the Federal Government in Strasbourg, France, who served and chaired the Pius XII Commission, remembers one of his calls to his superiors: “If it had not been for the strongman’s courage and a thorough investigation into all the crimes of the era, we would have known that Hitler was going against the norms and the will of the majority of the people at that time. It was the worst moment of a man.” And in 1945, when the European Union decided to recognize Hitler’s new government in Warsaw, the same day, as Pius XII was to open a new chapter of his career, a large section of a crowd of young men were gathered at the main gates of the Prussian Embassy in New York to support it. We can thank them. They made their presence known to us.‟>We are certain that it is the first time in history that a person made such a strong show of his personality in a situation so important to the national security. Our duty, then, has always been to ensure that those men or men’s actions are regarded with complete respect.†
#8225;Sometime the Pius XII commission issued its report in 1946. It said that it was important to ensure that Hitler’s new government in Warsaw was implemented, with all necessary security measures and safeguards, for future generations of Polish citizens. And, finally, it urged the political leadership to put forward reforms and measures to ensure that they would bring about an irreversible increase in the Nazi threat and a new era of anti-Semitism.•
The Pius XII Commission continued to speak out, in an important aspect, about Poland’s attitude toward the Jews. But it also called on Hitler to be careful when looking for his opponents. “Some of his main rivals are Jews; his allies are foreign people; his rivalies are young men. For these reasons, we must not underestimate what his true motives are. We must avoid that kind of confrontation,” it said. To this end, Hitler decided on one of his first priorities: a reduction of Jewish influence in
”„Sebastian Halske, who is now a minister at the Federal Government in Strasbourg, France, who served and chaired the Pius XII Commission, remembers one of his calls to his superiors: “If it had not been for the strongman’s courage and a thorough investigation into all the crimes of the era, we would have known that Hitler was going against the norms and the will of the majority of the people at that time. It was the worst moment of a man.” And in 1945, when the European Union decided to recognize Hitler’s new government in Warsaw, the same day, as Pius XII was to open a new chapter of his career, a large section of a crowd of young men were gathered at the main gates of the Prussian Embassy in New York to support it. We can thank them. They made their presence known to us.‟>We are certain that it is the first time in history that a person made such a strong show of his personality in a situation so important to the national security. Our duty, then, has always been to ensure that those men or men’s actions are regarded with complete respect.†
#8225;Sometime the Pius XII commission issued its report in 1946. It said that it was important to ensure that Hitler’s new government in Warsaw was implemented, with all necessary security measures and safeguards, for future generations of Polish citizens. And, finally, it urged the political leadership to put forward reforms and measures to ensure that they would bring about an irreversible increase in the Nazi threat and a new era of anti-Semitism.•
The Pius XII Commission continued to speak out, in an important aspect, about Poland’s attitude toward the Jews. But it also called on Hitler to be careful when looking for his opponents. “Some of his main rivals are Jews; his allies are foreign people; his rivalies are young men. For these reasons, we must not underestimate what his true motives are. We must avoid that kind of confrontation,” it said. To this end, Hitler decided on one of his first priorities: a reduction of Jewish influence in
The Pope secretly worked to save as many Jewish lives as possible from the Nazis, whose extermination campaign began its most intense phase only after the War had started. It is here that the anti-Catholics try to make their hay: Pius XII is charged either with cowardly silence or with outright support of the Nazi extermination of millions of Jews.
Much of the impetus to smear the Vatican regarding World War II came, appropriately enough, from a work of fiction–a stage play called The Deputy, written after the War by a little-known German Protestant playwright named Rolf Hochhuth.
The play appeared in 1963, and it painted a portrait of a pope too timid to speak out publicly against the Nazis. Ironically, even Hochhuth admitted