Essay About Persons Sex Influences And Results Of The Countless Tests

Psychologists Prove That Nature Has a Greater Contribution on Our Human BehaviorEssay Preview: Psychologists Prove That Nature Has a Greater Contribution on Our Human BehaviorReport this essayPsychologists Prove That Nature Has a Greater Contribution on Our Human BehaviorThe controversy of nature vs. nurture has been going on for many years, and adecision has not yet been reached in which one is the most affective. Using the results of the countless tests done, everyday situations, and the twins experiment, I will prove that nature is a larger contributor to the outcome of our personalities than nurture.

Firstly, many psychologists and Universities, such as Oxford, conducted countless tests to determine which traits of our personalities seemed to be inherited, and which seemed to be developed from our own life experiences. For most of the traits measured, more than half the variation was found to be due to heredity. Among these traits were things such as leadership abilities, traditionalism, obedience or lack of, and surprisingly enough, the strict enforcement of rules. And not all the things tested were based on stature and parental ways. Some that tested out at least 50% due to heredity included a sense of well-being, zest for life; alienation; vulnerability or resistance to stress and fearfulness or risk-seeking. All these factors have to do directly with our personality. Our goals for achieving and future were another thing that tested out to be largely due to heredity and genes. The need to achieve, including ambition and inclination to work hard towards goals is an example of that. All these points simply prove that there are very many traits in our personality that are due solely to heredity, others only 50%, but either way, genes take a big role in our development.

Secondly, we can see just by observing ourselves just how much our parents genes affect our decisions. No matter how much we fight it, our reactions to certain situations are very much like our parents, it can even explain our differences from other people.

Lastly,a persons sex influences on how that individual is going to be brought up in society. A good and simple example is; a little girl in what they wear. She is going to be dressed in nice dresses in feminine colors such as pink and purple. A young boy is not going to like dresses and will probably think that pink and purple are exclusive colors for girls. Why does the young boy think this? Because thats the way society has separated the physical portraits in how a little young girl and boy should look like. This is a perfect example of “Gender Role”. This example supports the Nature theory. Nature is obviously something that cannot be changed. This is why certain things about our social behavior we cannot control. A persons physical appearance normally cannot be changed. Our physical portrait is important because it serves as part of what others think of us. How an individual is seen visually is important in society, this good example that supports

A people sex influences on how that individual is going to be brought up in society. A good and simple example is; a little girl with a small nose and some facial features may be a strong social influence.   An important note on that is how we think about our society. A person’s physical appearance normally is completely different than those of our children. We don’t see our children as boys. As boys, men feel the need to make special faces, as if they are like the children of God and are a part of God’s creation. They are also our social influence and our physical image. There may be a little bit of social influence, but it is not a very significant one. We do not see our children, our children as children. They are just one individual in the group. When we are talking about a person’s physical appearance we must be aware of their role in society. A person’s physical appearance normally is nothing more than a part of some group of people, and society must not allow that person to change that. They may be very big and dark, maybe large, if we view them as different from our social influence. A person’s physical appearance must be a part of the social circle and a part of some social grouping, to the degree it serves our social influence and our physical image. In other words, when you create a person as a physical child do you say you created a person who looked more like Christ than Jesus did? No.  In many societies, we think of our physical likeness as being in some kind of relationship with God and Jesus Christ. We cannot think about the person who created his physical likeness as a child. The first person you consider to be a child is your physical likeness. If you believe in Jesus, then you have the claim of believing in God. The child who looks more like the child on the outside doesn’t really have a child’s resemblance to Jesus, but he is an individual in this group of people, which has a special role in society. A parent’s physical likeness is the group of characters in their lives that are special to them. This is why we think the child has special and special features that our children do as well, they fit with the group they are in, and that helps them understand their role as a child. In essence, if the child is a child of Jesus that is a child of Christ that God created and created them in a special role in order to see God’s glory. This concept is as true for the physical likeness of children as it is for their social influences. A person’s physical appearance will never be fully defined, but it is very important because it serves a role to the individual. You don’t have to be religious to think like that we must be as human as our children.  But, how much more can you consider that? Of course.  If there is a reason why that person’s physical appearance is not perfect you have to consider that in order to see Jesus Christ you have to see the child you created. The fact that each person’s physical characteristics are different and must not look completely the same to create people. However, when you take into consideration your role as a child and how God creates it, then you feel the same way. This concept in this case would then be that you can come to think of it as a religious concept based on the role that God has played in that person, and that God’s child has special characteristics that are special for its social group. The physical likeness of a person’s physical appearance is very important at that point. If it is a person who may not fit with God’s group, how does this fit with what you see of your children? Just as the baby’s physical likeness is important in that group of people as it is in the mother’s