Swot Analysis TescoEssay Preview: Swot Analysis TescoReport this essayDavid Blunkett has said he is “deeply sorry” for the embarrassment he has caused Tony Blair, after he resigned as work and pensions secretary.He said he was guilty of making a mistake on three occasions and was now “paying the price for it”.Tony Blair described Mr Blunkett as a “decent and honourable man”.Mr Blunkett quit after breaking the ministerial code of conduct over paid work he took while out of the Cabinet. John Hutton is to replace him.Michael Howard said the events showed a “haemorrhage” of Mr Blairs authority.David Blunkett chose to resign because he had reached the conclusion that the position was untenable and that he would be unable to continue in his position
David Blunkett has decided to resign on a number of grounds. First, he was under pressure to resign but his advisers were against him with them believing that doing so in such a short time allowed him to reach the final decision.
Mr Blunkett, when he gave the final answer on a personal issue – such as why he did not choose to speak out against the Tories in front of a Parliamentary inquiry on a personal issue – had a hard time choosing the right person to act as leader of“.
The decision to resign has shown that Mr Blunkett accepted there is a risk the leadership is not ready to work with the public – and that as a result of his decision, there is a risk that they will not be willing to work with the public in a meaningful way. As in any case, Mr Blunkett did not expect to win a second term – and has been advised to expect to win a second term if he makes the right decision.
For the majority of its history, Labour has been able to win three of five parliamentary and election elections between 1974 and 1988 – so having won by a narrow margin, Labour was able to form a majority government to avoid losing any of its majority and remain solvent, and the opposition parties failed out of power.
As he did on several occasions before the resignation, after Mr Blunkett resigned, Mr Blair spoke to the chairman of the Labour parliamentary committee about his decision and called the resignation a ‘huge success’. Mr Blair said he regretted that there was no option but to resign under pressure.
However he said as a result of his decision “there was a significant risk that the leadership was not ready to work with the public”.
Mr Blunkett was not alone in expressing his frustration with the leader who refused to talk to the media. Chris Huhne said:
Labour has suffered a serious financial loss for the last four years and Mr Blunkett is now having to confront this to find a suitable replacement.
The leadership was faced with the prospect of an uncertain future as they worked to prepare for the first ever General Election, with the likelihood of a General Election that is less favourable for the party.
I said to Tony Blair that he should resign and he said he regretted it but I now think that he should resign if he is not given the opportunity to find a suitable successor and I think it was a real mistake for him – and for Tony Blair. And he has resigned.
It will be fascinating to see where that next post will take him. The problem for the Labour leader and for the rest of us today is not the leadership, it’s the leader not the people. The leadership is not capable of responding effectively. It’s not able to act in public and the leadership needs to be better educated on the challenges of this government where we face the biggest challenges.
David Blunkett has decided to resign on a number of grounds. First, he was under pressure to resign but his advisers were against him with them believing that doing so in such a short time allowed him to reach the final decision.
Mr Blunkett, when he gave the final answer on a personal issue – such as why he did not choose to speak out against the Tories in front of a Parliamentary inquiry on a personal issue – had a hard time choosing the right person to act as leader of“.
The decision to resign has shown that Mr Blunkett accepted there is a risk the leadership is not ready to work with the public – and that as a result of his decision, there is a risk that they will not be willing to work with the public in a meaningful way. As in any case, Mr Blunkett did not expect to win a second term – and has been advised to expect to win a second term if he makes the right decision.
For the majority of its history, Labour has been able to win three of five parliamentary and election elections between 1974 and 1988 – so having won by a narrow margin, Labour was able to form a majority government to avoid losing any of its majority and remain solvent, and the opposition parties failed out of power.
As he did on several occasions before the resignation, after Mr Blunkett resigned, Mr Blair spoke to the chairman of the Labour parliamentary committee about his decision and called the resignation a ‘huge success’. Mr Blair said he regretted that there was no option but to resign under pressure.
However he said as a result of his decision “there was a significant risk that the leadership was not ready to work with the public”.
Mr Blunkett was not alone in expressing his frustration with the leader who refused to talk to the media. Chris Huhne said:
Labour has suffered a serious financial loss for the last four years and Mr Blunkett is now having to confront this to find a suitable replacement.
The leadership was faced with the prospect of an uncertain future as they worked to prepare for the first ever General Election, with the likelihood of a General Election that is less favourable for the party.
I said to Tony Blair that he should resign and he said he regretted it but I now think that he should resign if he is not given the opportunity to find a suitable successor and I think it was a real mistake for him – and for Tony Blair. And he has resigned.
It will be fascinating to see where that next post will take him. The problem for the Labour leader and for the rest of us today is not the leadership, it’s the leader not the people. The leadership is not capable of responding effectively. It’s not able to act in public and the leadership needs to be better educated on the challenges of this government where we face the biggest challenges.
David Blunkett has decided to resign on a number of grounds. First, he was under pressure to resign but his advisers were against him with them believing that doing so in such a short time allowed him to reach the final decision.
Mr Blunkett, when he gave the final answer on a personal issue – such as why he did not choose to speak out against the Tories in front of a Parliamentary inquiry on a personal issue – had a hard time choosing the right person to act as leader of“.
The decision to resign has shown that Mr Blunkett accepted there is a risk the leadership is not ready to work with the public – and that as a result of his decision, there is a risk that they will not be willing to work with the public in a meaningful way. As in any case, Mr Blunkett did not expect to win a second term – and has been advised to expect to win a second term if he makes the right decision.
For the majority of its history, Labour has been able to win three of five parliamentary and election elections between 1974 and 1988 – so having won by a narrow margin, Labour was able to form a majority government to avoid losing any of its majority and remain solvent, and the opposition parties failed out of power.
As he did on several occasions before the resignation, after Mr Blunkett resigned, Mr Blair spoke to the chairman of the Labour parliamentary committee about his decision and called the resignation a ‘huge success’. Mr Blair said he regretted that there was no option but to resign under pressure.
However he said as a result of his decision “there was a significant risk that the leadership was not ready to work with the public”.
Mr Blunkett was not alone in expressing his frustration with the leader who refused to talk to the media. Chris Huhne said:
Labour has suffered a serious financial loss for the last four years and Mr Blunkett is now having to confront this to find a suitable replacement.
The leadership was faced with the prospect of an uncertain future as they worked to prepare for the first ever General Election, with the likelihood of a General Election that is less favourable for the party.
I said to Tony Blair that he should resign and he said he regretted it but I now think that he should resign if he is not given the opportunity to find a suitable successor and I think it was a real mistake for him – and for Tony Blair. And he has resigned.
It will be fascinating to see where that next post will take him. The problem for the Labour leader and for the rest of us today is not the leadership, it’s the leader not the people. The leadership is not capable of responding effectively. It’s not able to act in public and the leadership needs to be better educated on the challenges of this government where we face the biggest challenges.
Prime Ministers official spokesmanMr Blunkett was previously forced to step down as home secretary in December 2004.At the centre of the recent controversy was Mr Blunketts two-week directorship of DNA Bioscience before Mays election, while he was out of the Cabinet.
Mr Blunkett broke ministerial rules by taking that job without consulting an independent committee which advises former ministers on whether they should take up jobs.
At a press conference in central London, Mr Blunkett told reporters he had been considering quitting since last week, but made his mind up to go on Wednesday “to protect the government”.
My faultHe had been due to appear before the Commons work and pensions committee on Wednesday morning.But instead he went to Downing Street to tell Mr Blair of his decision to resign.“What I am clear about is that I have made a mistake,” he said.He should have consulted an advisory committee before taking up new jobs after leaving office for the first time in December, he added.“Was I at fault not writing to the committee?” he asked. “Yes, I was. It was the same fault on three occasions arising from the same misunderstanding by me.
“I have to take the consequences of that, which is why I am standing down today.”Blair is the targetBut he denied he had done anything wrong by buying shares in DNA Bioscience. “Having investments and holding shares in modern Britain is not a crime, declaring them is imperative,” he said.
“I am deeply sorry for the embarrassment I have caused the prime minister,” he said.“Its the prime minister that some people wish to target. I wish to support him, I wish him to continue taking forward the modernisation.”HAVE YOUR SAYAfter a promising ministerial start, his career lapsed into a series of incidents characterised by poor judgementMichael, LondonSend us your commentsMr Blunkett said after speaking to Mr Blair, “Tony asked me to stay”.It was only while walking between Downing Street and Portcullis House, where he was due to appear before the work and pensions committee, that he could “smell and feel it was time to step away”.