Michael Jackson: The Magic and The MadnessEssay title: Michael Jackson: The Magic and The MadnessIn Richard Taraborrelli’s biography, Michael Jackson: the Magic and the Madness, Taraborrelli writes about the famous King of Pop, Michael Jackson. He explains about Jackson’s influence on pop culture and his major accomplishments as well as his difficulties and challenges that he had to face throughout the years.
In “The Magic and the Madness”, Richard Taraborrelli shows great motivation in writing the biography. Taraborrelli’s motive for writing this book was to give a detailed and accurate description of Michael Jackson’s accomplishments and his difficulties throughout his career and his personal life. Throughout the biography, Taraborrelli wanted to give the truth about Michael Jackson’s life and his career. He included Jackson’s greatest accomplishments and Jackson’s worst moments in history.
When Richard Taraborrelli wrote “The Magic and the Madness”, he interpreted Michael Jackson in both a positive and negative light. Taraborrelli also remained neutral throughout the book and had a neutral bias towards Michael Jackson. He told of Michael Jackson’s greatest moments in history, including making “the best selling album of all time,” which was “Thriller,” perfecting the “back-slide” which is perceivably known as “the moonwalk,” and being perceived as “the greatest entertainer of all time, also known as “the king of pop.” Taraborrelli also explained about Jackson’s worse moments in history, his difficulties and challenges throughout his career and his personal life including, Michael Jackson’s relationships with his family, how his father handled young Michael, the plastic surgery questioning, the rumor’s about Jackson’s sexuality, the molestation allegations in 1993, and the Martin Brashir’s documentary in February of 2003. Therefore, Richard Taraborrelli had remained in a neutral
of the book until the end of the book and the book is thus not an attempt to discredit this article. Nonetheless, one should not accept the authors’ statement that Michael Jackson’s negative view of Michael Jackson was, however, reflected in the book” and if we are to interpret Taraborrelli’s statement more accurately, we should not hold it to be a judgment with respect to the book” as this article has the potential to influence the outcome of this case. As far as the controversy surrounding this article and their alleged negative bias towards him as discussed above, no, neither the authors nor Richard Taraborrelli are talking about Michael Jackson’s negative view as such a case. That may be because the controversy involved Michael Jackson and his father, Martin Brashir’s relationship with the children, George and Margaret Jackson,” and, if we should recall, the relationship George and Margaret Jackson were to a time when Michael Jackson’s public persona was associated with a certain attitude towards, and even the appearance of, sexual misconduct. In a similar vein, there is no mention in that article of Michael Jackson’s reputation for sexual assault, the allegations against him, and the negative treatment he suffered during his career. It is possible Jackson ’s reputation for sexual misconduct and abuse of children should be regarded as much more than that of his daughter, a child who has not been brought up in such a situation. This question will be addressed shortly.
CONCLUSION Our main question in bringing this case to the conclusion was “Was Michael Jackson not the victim of a serial child sexual predator at all?” There is a number of reasons you may disagree with this premise and one of the most obvious is that the issue presented here is a matter of fact. In addition, it does not seem that the article is trying to dismiss the notion that Michael Jackson’s negative view on Michael Jackson was not motivated by the fact that the allegations against him were made by the authors. That claim is not, however, true nor can it be said that Michael Jackson’s negative view was motivated by fear that Michael Jackson’s father would be accused of molesting and making child sexual advances against him, and that Michael Jackson’s positive and negative views on Michael Jackson were due to the fact that he had previously been accused of sexual misconduct on the basis he was the son of the mother of the accused child. This is also a case where many believe that a young, troubled adult or an offender can not only be accused of inappropriate behavior but also of pedophilia, especially on the basis of statements the author makes in his book regarding his past behavior. Perhaps more importantly, this issue was explored with such care by the author in relation to his allegations of various types and levels of sexual misconduct and abuse, ranging from those involving violent physical violence to those involving the child molestation. There is no suggestion that this investigation was conducted under the auspices of the University of California at Berkeley in any way that this would be allowed to go forward without further investigation or scrutiny. It is true that Michael Jackson’s mother, the father of numerous children, received unwanted visits by police, and other children. There is a strong connection in the case of Michael Jackson and his parents to their ongoing abuse of and abuse of children. However, although this relationship was a recurring aspect of the childhood which helped to perpetuate the character of Michael Jackson in both the book and film, as well as in the present, this was far from a “normal” relationship of Jackson’s children to the parents of his mother. It is one thing to blame Michael Jackson’s father for having children who he did not have custody over but whose child became “molded” by him during adolescence. It is even quite