The Interdependance Between Methylphenidate (ritalin) and Society
Join now to read essay The Interdependance Between Methylphenidate (ritalin) and Society
The amphetamine-like stimulant, methylphenidate, has been the source of a world of controversy in recent years. The drug, more commonly known as Ritalin, Concerta, Metadate, Attenda, or one of several other prescription names, exhibits numerous, deeply rooted connections to society. These ties to society are essential to understanding the drug, and the controversy surrounding it. As Anne Fausto-Sterling says in “Science Matters, Culture Matters,” “The modern view that science and culture are separate and that hybrids do not exist lies at the heart of our communication problem” (Fausto-Sterling, 117). The more we look at methylphenidate and its alleged connections to society, the bolder these interrelationships become. From unlikely beginnings, the drug was born into a society that would develop new and different needs for it. In looking at multiple aspects of the drug such as history, chemistry, controversy, use and abuse, it will become apparent that methylphenidates role in society influences the societal view of the drug, as mediated by several factors. Societys view of the drug, in turn, influences the role of the drug by directly changing how the drug is used, as the use of a drug is defined by the actions of individual members of society.
Early Uses
It was Jared Diamonds claim in Guns, Germs, and Steel that need stems from the creation of a technology (Diamond, 242). He goes on to discuss that at the time of a technological invention, societys need for that technology, assuming the society decides to adopt the invention, is undetermined. Cultures tend to find new and different uses for technologies, and methylphenidate is no exception to this trend.
Narcolepsy, chronic fatigue, and depression are all related in a more pertinent way than just being tied together symptomatically. Though they are all marked by exhaustion, sadness, weakness, and apathy, these diseases are similar in that they were the intended use of methylphenidate when it was first synthesized in 1944. Ciba Pharmaceutical Company, which today is known as the Swiss pharmaceutical company Novartus, coined the name Ritalin for their methylphenidate drug, and began marketing it for those uses in 1957 (Arria, Ritalin). It seems, however, that the facts to prove that society began by using methylphenidate to serve a different purpose than it does today, are much less surprising than the knowledge of what the drugs original function was. Who would guess that the same drug being poked fun at by todays media for turning Americas hyperactive children into soulless work-robots was originally used to give energy and motivation to individuals plagued by exhaustion and sadness? One may ask if todays Ritalin is the same drug as the Ritalin of 1957.
The answer to such an inquiry would certainly be yes. The methylphenidate chemical is somewhat structurally similar to both amphetamine and methamphetamine. Some classify it as an amphetamine, but many more classify methylphenidate in the broader group, stimulant. Either way, it works like most amphetamines, stimulating the central nervous system. In patients of depression, narcolepsy, and chronic fatigue, methylphenidate is the perfect kick to get them going, which is why it is still prescribed for those uses. This explanation makes sense in explaining how Ritalin works to treat the disorders it was originally intended to treat. However, it also raises a bigger question than it answers. If a stimulant works