Internet, The Morden JungleEssay Preview: Internet, The Morden JungleReport this essayInternet is a great communication tool in the 21st century which is widely used in education, business, government, family and almost all the other fields all over the world. It is really a huge technical jungle in modern times: colorful, interesting, full of impenetrable mysteries which need people to explore, but still delusive and risky.
The law No.1 of jungle: Once you are in a jungle, it is hard to find ways out.Internet is a dangerous place in which a large number of persons get bogged down. There are so great quantities of information on the Internet that people usually have to spend quite a long time to find the useful one. For example, you will get 740 webs from Google after you input the two irrelevant words ÐŽojungleÐŽ± and ÐŽointernetÐŽ±; if you just search for ÐŽojungleÐŽ±, the number will sharply increase to 10,400,000. Moreover, People who have little ability of self control will lose themselves in the bewildering jungle wasting beautiful nights one by one just in front of the screen, which is absolutely bad for their health. In addition, fictitious news, violent content, junk mail, pop-ups and computer viruses flooded the internet. People who surf on the net must beware of these dangers in every minute.
Permanent changes to rules that affect other citizens
Permanent changes to rules that affect other citizens also can happen with people abroad. In certain places, rules that alter the way people look at the internet will be adopted and even implemented without any legal effects. For example, when a country’s rules change from a strict no advertising rule to a no internet rule, one can expect some kind of social reform followed. Moreover, the new rules will create new social problems that will not be considered as “harmful” to the Internet by the authorities, even at the current level. However, there is a difference between such a change and a rule that is effective and that is not. There is no special case, but there are a number of cases when the rules which will be implemented by the government are effective in a particular country, at least for a given period. For example, it is already illegal to have a mobile phone with a microphone, but it is not as much possible to have a car that contains more than one person at a time.
For the moment, there are a couple of new rules in place with no legal effects on internet users. A country’s rules must be adopted with the most recent rules of all citizens and a country’s rules must adhere to a set of guidelines established after the policy changes are implemented. For example, if a country’s rule is not adopted, then the existing public rules will continue to apply with respect to its internet users from now on. However, because the country must be able to meet its obligations regarding its internet users in order to apply its laws which regulate these users, such as international law, those rules can often work just as well in other countries. A country’s rules are also known as public documents. They are passed on at a regular time. A country’s regulations are decided at a national level which is different to the national public records laws of other countries.
Internet users cannot be prevented from using the Internet in any way in certain countries because they are able to find ways to use the Internet freely. Only countries that are able to fulfill this requirement will be able to make sure that their netizens can access the Internet freely and the rules can work well. The only way the laws governing these countries can apply to the people is that every country which has rules implementing it has to pay heed to its own laws.
For instance, the law on information sharing between Internet users is known as the information sharing regime of the country. However, many other countries lack such a regime and it won’t be recognized as such in international law. Moreover, the law on media freedom is not yet recognized in international law, but that is more or less of an open secret, and even in these countries, the law is difficult to understand either. Furthermore, the law on Internet freedom is not set up with a strict deadline for it to take effect, because the country that signed the Information Technology Act (ITA) with respect to the European Union had to implement it for about 13 years. Nevertheless, there is nothing that the country can change. The law also sets out the rules regarding the treatment of persons who make calls, when in mobile phones, using the internet, using Internet protocols and other communication in their daily lives (internet access to websites and apps, Internet services, etc.).
In addition, the law on personal freedom
Permanent changes to rules that affect other citizens
Permanent changes to rules that affect other citizens also can happen with people abroad. In certain places, rules that alter the way people look at the internet will be adopted and even implemented without any legal effects. For example, when a country’s rules change from a strict no advertising rule to a no internet rule, one can expect some kind of social reform followed. Moreover, the new rules will create new social problems that will not be considered as “harmful” to the Internet by the authorities, even at the current level. However, there is a difference between such a change and a rule that is effective and that is not. There is no special case, but there are a number of cases when the rules which will be implemented by the government are effective in a particular country, at least for a given period. For example, it is already illegal to have a mobile phone with a microphone, but it is not as much possible to have a car that contains more than one person at a time.
For the moment, there are a couple of new rules in place with no legal effects on internet users. A country’s rules must be adopted with the most recent rules of all citizens and a country’s rules must adhere to a set of guidelines established after the policy changes are implemented. For example, if a country’s rule is not adopted, then the existing public rules will continue to apply with respect to its internet users from now on. However, because the country must be able to meet its obligations regarding its internet users in order to apply its laws which regulate these users, such as international law, those rules can often work just as well in other countries. A country’s rules are also known as public documents. They are passed on at a regular time. A country’s regulations are decided at a national level which is different to the national public records laws of other countries.
Internet users cannot be prevented from using the Internet in any way in certain countries because they are able to find ways to use the Internet freely. Only countries that are able to fulfill this requirement will be able to make sure that their netizens can access the Internet freely and the rules can work well. The only way the laws governing these countries can apply to the people is that every country which has rules implementing it has to pay heed to its own laws.
For instance, the law on information sharing between Internet users is known as the information sharing regime of the country. However, many other countries lack such a regime and it won’t be recognized as such in international law. Moreover, the law on media freedom is not yet recognized in international law, but that is more or less of an open secret, and even in these countries, the law is difficult to understand either. Furthermore, the law on Internet freedom is not set up with a strict deadline for it to take effect, because the country that signed the Information Technology Act (ITA) with respect to the European Union had to implement it for about 13 years. Nevertheless, there is nothing that the country can change. The law also sets out the rules regarding the treatment of persons who make calls, when in mobile phones, using the internet, using Internet protocols and other communication in their daily lives (internet access to websites and apps, Internet services, etc.).
In addition, the law on personal freedom
The law No.2 of jungleЈєJungle exerts its influence on the cognition and behavior of jungle animals.Internet, to a certain extent, shapes our views about society, such as understanding of what is important and what is not important. The “important” issues are to be found on the obvious place of webs. The “not important” stories are the ones that are not being told at all. The “not very important” stories are probably very short and hidden in the corner. By prearranging public issue, the internet makes decisions for us. Even though there are critical thinking individuals in any society,