Climate Change and Food Security in Australia – Essay – lisppvar paper_count = 89517;ga(create, UA-5244355-2, essaysforstudent.com);ga(send, pageview);(function(d, s, id) {var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if (d.getElementById(id)) return;js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);}(document, script, facebook-jssdk));SearchEssaysSign upSign inContact usvar toggle_head_search_input = 0;Tweet!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?http:https;if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js;fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, script, twitter-wjs);
Index/Social IssuesClimate Change and Food Security in AustraliaCitizens of Australia are, for the most part, lucky enough to enjoy its very high food security with readily available food and produce. However there are a variety of issues that may impact our food security in the near future, a major issue being climate change. Climate change is undoubtedly one of the largest problems that Australia and indeed the world is currently facing. It causes fluctuations in weather patterns and temperatures and result in many types of crops being unable to grow. As our population increases so does our consumption rates and the amount of greenhouse gases that are emitted. Unfortunately, excess of these greenhouse gases is the main cause of climate change and global warming, an issue that could not only damage the world’s environments and their inhabitants but also lead to a lack of food security in many countries including Australia.
Climate change and global warming is the result of an increase in greenhouse gases, which include methane and carbon dioxide emissions. With the world’s population growing by some 75 million people each year our demand for fossil fuels (like coal, oil and gas) to power our factories, energy sources and means of transport has also grown. Ceasing the use of fossil fuels for transport would greatly improve how we stand in terms of greenhouse gas emissions and our contribution to global warming. However, at this stage, where almost everything we do as humans requires the use of fossil fuels, this solution is unrealistic and most likely wouldn’t work. A better solution would be to have a less excessive meat production industry. With livestock farming making up 18% of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions, not only is this solution more realistic, but also more effective than eliminating the use of fossil fuels, with global transport only making up 13% of greenhouse gas emissions. Even though it may seem counter-intuitive; Â downsizing one of Australia’s largest food industries to better our food security, creating a less excessive meat production industry would greatly reduce our contribution to global warming and could actually create even more food, which we will talk about later in the presentation.
There are a variety of positive and negative social impacts that could arise as a result of having a less excessive and environmentally taxing meat industry. Meat, particularly beef, is a staple of the typical Australian diet and many Australians will be very unhappy with the prospect of having less steak and sausages at their next barbecue. However this is a necessary sacrifice if we want to contribute less to global warming and ensure our food security in the future. This negative social impact is also heavily outweighed by the fact that if we have a less excessive meat industry, we will have much more of other types of food. All the grains and soya produce that are given to livestock for food, could be used to feed humans. In 2011, 883 million tons of corn, and 260 million tons of soybeans were grown globally. However, on average, 40-50% of that corn, and 80% of those soybeans are fed to farmed animals, rather than being eaten directly by humans. Scientists have reached the conclusion that if all the food fed to animals were fed directly to humans, 70% more food would be added to the world’s supply, enough to feed an extra 4 billion people, which could cure world hunger four times over. So not only would making a less excessive meat industry help global warming, but it could directly provide food security for Australia and the world for years to come.
Economically speaking, the meat industry provides jobs and money for Australians all over the country, and downsizing the industry would result in unemployment on a national scale. However, again, this is merely a short term issue and is a sacrifice that must be made. With worldwide hunger, famine and starvation on the line a short term loss of jobs and a dint in the Australian economy is hardly worth considering. Not to mention there are some positive economic impacts that could come as a result of a less excessive meat production industry. There would be less equipment, machinery, land and housing required for these livestock, meaning the industry would cost less in the long run. Other job opportunities, previously unavailable, may arise in other food industries such as corn and soya.
This argument is not unique to the Australian case. A majority of the world’s industrialised economies have historically been heavily reliant on meat. What the country can do is move with less violence. They could expand with a stronger and diversified product base that makes up for the long run unemployment resulting from the shift to more sustainable sources of resources and a better environment. It is possible that more meat can be sourced locally and produced locally.
As many as half of Australia’s population lives just outside the dairy supply chain and is thus less likely to eat large quantities of protein and vitamins, compared to people living outside the main population. The food movement should demand that we move away from dairy as some of the major inputs of industry. Meat production should be a means of support for the poor in Australia, but it is a large part of the Australian economy. An increase in the production of meat products has the potential of providing more opportunities for the more well off and for those living longer, healthy lives. The long run impacts that a greater meat industry could bring on would include:
More meat production for people who need more protein.
Increased demand for dairy protein to feed the children, elderly and the sick.
More meat eating opportunities and access to high quality milk alternatives through improved milk packaging.
Saturated fat levels should be lowered and animal feed should be added to dairy products, but there have been some recent suggestions that reducing or eliminating fat from milk could be achieved quickly.
Nutrition experts and the public should help to provide the dairy sector with resources to help in the transition to a dairy-based diet. This would include:
Reducing or eliminating unhealthy choices by dairy producers
Suffering from obesity, diabetes or diabetes in the dairy sector.
Increased demand for dairy protein to feed the young, healthy and old.
Increasing demand for lean protein.
Increasing demand for dairy products.
Changing Australian milk quality and quantity. It is important for the nation, by means of dairy products, to be given this opportunity and for it to be properly sourced. Increasing competition within dairy markets should facilitate the supply of high quality dairy products.
In terms of economic value, the dairy industry could be expected to be expected to provide more of the income and economic value it currently receives from the meat industry. This would also include purchasing and selling beef that is less expensive and produce with far better quality that the less expensive beef used in the Australia-Europe Meat Market. However, by reducing the animal cost for dairy production, the dairy industry would provide a greater amount of revenue, as well as providing a healthier environment to produce and consume meat in the future.
As you can see, the benefits could be vast (as it will enable us to pay higher taxes for the dairy industry and reduce costs for the food industry, and also generate more money for the Australian taxpayer). In reality, one need only put the dairy industry on an even larger scale to take all of the economic benefits and benefits of reducing dairy prices and reducing beef production.
As long as Australia continues to support a more sustainable dairy intake, we’ll reap far more income
In terms of how the environment would be effected, there are very few, if any, negative environmental impacts worth considering that would come as a result of less meat production. There are, however, a multitude of positive impacts such as a decline in CO2, methane and other greenhouse gas emissions that are produced as a result of the machinery, equipment and the livestock themselves. There would also be a lot less deforestation. Rainforests, which are needed to absorb the world’s copious amounts of CO2 emissions, are being
Continue for 6 more pages »Read full documentDownload as (for upgraded members)Citation GeneratorMLA 7CHICAGO(2016, 08). Climate Change and Food Security in Australia. EssaysForStudent.com. Retrieved 08, 2016, from“Climate Change and Food Security in Australia” EssaysForStudent.com. 08 2016. 2016. 08 2016 <
"Climate Change and Food Security in Australia." EssaysForStudent.com. EssaysForStudent.com, 08 2016. Web. 08 2016. <
"Climate Change and Food Security in Australia." EssaysForStudent.com. 08, 2016. Accessed 08, 2016.
var gp2 = _01035_;
var _gallery = "2f4d643ba61e3430d2fd1b9f6ca4265b,325556efe1fcf8f67077f8df04a73999,bf269c41215c75e8f92cb9571ebf548c,02f1a0794c94170078cc2b0f31ca4725,788ca8750b9766849cbfb6d98505fe8d".split(",");
var previews = "2f4d643ba61e3430d2fd1b9f6ca4265b,325556efe1fcf8f67077f8df04a73999,bf269c41215c75e8f92cb9571ebf548c,02f1a0794c94170078cc2b0f31ca4725,788ca8750b9766849cbfb6d98505fe8d".split(",");
var document_title=decodeURIComponent(Climate+Change+and+Food+Security+in+Australia);
var blur = "0,0,0,0,0".split(",");
var blur_title=JOIN NOW
to read this document;var blur_btn_text=Sign up;var blur_btn_href=/join.html?clk=preview;var _page=Page;var blur_advantages = [Get Access to 89,000+ Essays and Term Papers,Join 209,000+ Other Students,High Quality Essays and Documents];Essay PreviewBy: lisppSubmitted: August 22, 2016Essay Length: 1,513 Words / 7 PagesPaper type: EssayViews: 511Report this essayTweet!function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0],p=/^http:/.test(d.location)?http:https;if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src=p+://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js;fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document, script, twitter-wjs);
Related EssaysThe Effects of Climatic Change on the Fall of CivilizationFor decades, the dominant view has been that cultural factors- war, religion, trade, palace intrigue- explain civilizations’ ups and downs (Grossman 2002). As we are
1,796 Words  |  8 PagesGlobal Climate Change Case Study AnalysisOne atmospheric phenomenon that enables the Earth to sustain life is known as the “greenhouse effect.” However, vital this effect is for human life,387 Words  |  2 PagesClimate and Food of GreeceClimate GREEK CLIMATE Greece has a climate all its own. Greece has fairly warm temperatures all year round and is very nice to live in…well963 Words  |  4 PagesFood SecurityFood security exists when all people, at all time have physical and economical access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food to meet their dietary needs
320 Words  |  2 PagesSimilar TopicsLucas Foods Case AnalysisShould Nations Be Forced to Address Climate ChangeGet Access to 89,000+ Essays and Term PapersJoin 209,000+ Other StudentsHigh Quality Essays and DocumentsSign up© 2008–2020 EssaysForStudent.comFree Essays, Book Reports, Term Papers and Research PapersEssaysSign upSign inContact usSite MapPrivacy PolicyTerms of ServiceFacebookTwitter