Ethics of Meat EatingEssay Preview: Ethics of Meat EatingReport this essayEthics of Meat EatingEveryone differs in their own way. Some look skinny, some are heavy, and some have beauty while others are without it. These qualities are seen and judged in everyone a person encounters everyday of their lives. But there is never a thought of whether that person is a meat eater or a vegetarian when one look at someone, because it is not a physical attribute. However, being a vegetarian changes the dynamics of a person and the way they live. This way of life is now taking place all over the world. Today, vegetarianism means refraining from eating any meats, especially red meat. The traditional vegetarian has turned into a group of varied lifestyles, like vegans, lacto-vegetarians, ovo-vegetarians and many others. People who don’t understand vegetarians may think these people are a drop out of the hippies, or vegetarians may be labelled as weird. Vegetarianism may have a few disadvantages, but as a convenience and healthy alternative to meat, vegetarianism is a healthy choice for Americans.
There are many reasons why one would choose vegetarianism. The main advantage is that it is good for one’s health. There is a great risk of obesity and heart diseases from meats that contain an abundance of cholesterol. Vegetarianism has been proven to increase one’s lifespan and it is a lifestyle choice. Vegetarians are also less obese and have a more active and healthy lifestyle. “For whatever haphazard combination of proteins I ate, being a vegetarian did seem to have a stunning effect on my cholesterol level” (Fraser 687). Vegetables have fewer preservatives in them than meat since vegetables are primarily eaten raw. A good physical figure can be obtained easier on a vegetarian diet because vegetables have less cholesterol. “…My total cholesterol level was a super-low 135, and my ratio of HDL (good) cholesterol to LDL (evil) was so impressive that the doctor drawled…” (Fraser 687), Vegetables are a good aid for digestion as they contain a great amount of fiber. This food group gives the body more energy because vegetables are a primary source from the food chain. We consume twice the amount of protein that one needs to be on a meat-based diet, and this over-eating can lead to osteoporosis, kidney stones, and cancer. “Vegetarian diets have been shown to reduce one’s chances of forming kidney stones and gallstones. Diets that are high in protein, especially animal protein, tend to cause the body to excrete more calcium, oxalate, and uric acid” (Vegetarian Foods: Powerful for Health).
The second reason meat should be cut out of one’s diet, is the cruelty of killing animals to eat them. “The vast majority of our food animals are now raised under methods that are systematically abusive. This is not husbandry. This is persecution. In the face of such abuse, the moral defense of meat eating is left in tatters” (Gladden 697). Animals are kept in small, overcrowded cages. They are injected with steroids to put more meat on their bones. Animals are chemically engineered so that they are easier to slaughter and package to send off to stores. Once the animals get to the slaughterhouse, they are mutilated, for example cows are dehorned and branded without any sort of painkillers of any form. Summed up, when animals go to the slaughterhouse to be packaged, they do not have a painless death, as much as that would help, people should be made more aware because it is happening all over the world all the time.
The Slaughter Act
The House version of the House Slaughter Act is the main legislative tool used to prosecute human trafficking and to prevent it from receding. It makes it more difficult for an illegal trafficker to be traced, particularly if the victim has only been convicted of a capital offence—which is highly unlikely. However, the Act does not provide for the creation of an independent investigation unit. This leaves victims with little recourse to the legal system as to where they may be sent or whether they are prosecuted (Zimmerman 9). The Law Reform and Reconciliation Commission does, however, provide for victims to be able to claim compensation (Gupta 8). In addition, victims can request an independent investigation unit to investigate and prosecute human trafficking.
In a landmark report on human trafficking, the British Human Rights Commission (CHR) concluded that the UK’s human-trafficking framework was “less intrusive and less restrictive in the use of force than in other jurisdictions”.
The Committee for the Protection of Animals’ report on the abuse of animals from factory farms in the UK states that “the UK has limited authority to conduct investigations because it is unable and unwilling to use the most sophisticated methods to determine the proper treatment of animals”. While the Committee for the Protection of Animals recommends that the Government consider whether there is sufficient public resources available to facilitate any investigation, the Committee does not specify which, or how the government would use such resources (Journer 6). The UK Government agrees that the laws prohibiting human trafficking in the UK should be changed.
Human trafficking has been a big problem in the last decade, and its impact on those victims of it is almost certainly already well documented. That human trafficking has been a big problem in the last decade has led to a national debate on how to tackle it. Most recently, the United Nations has recently announced that it wants to increase measures to criminalise human trafficking by providing legal services and ensuring that all people in the developing world are held accountable for their trafficking. The Human Rights Council, which has been advocating for action for a decade, has issued a report expressing their opposition to the proposals for improving legislation and guidelines governing how human trafficking is treated (Wolff 6). The UN report, “The Trafficking in Persons Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination in the Employment of Children”, is available here.
The Council urges the UK Government to consider whether and how it would make its current criminal and legal framework clear and how the UK is dealing with it. What this means for the UK, how its existing criminal and criminal laws are handling the issues of human trafficking, and how the criminal and prosecution laws and procedures with regard to human trafficking will make it clearer and more effective for UK human rights campaigners. The Human Rights Council also advises the UK Government not to introduce or revise criminal or punishment provisions that do not protect people in need from human trafficking; that no provision will make possible the establishment of a mechanism to punish people for serious or ongoing crimes of human trafficking
The human rights committee is committed to ensuring that human trafficking is seen to be the worst human trafficking crime that can be stopped with appropriate safeguards. This calls heavily for the UN, the Commission on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination in the Employment of Children (CEDAW), the United Nations Human Rights Council and all organisations who represent human-trafficking victims across the globe to urgently and publicly demand that the UK Human Rights Council work together with all states and international human rights organizations to make laws and implement a criminal and criminal justice framework that addresses the
The Slaughter Act
The House version of the House Slaughter Act is the main legislative tool used to prosecute human trafficking and to prevent it from receding. It makes it more difficult for an illegal trafficker to be traced, particularly if the victim has only been convicted of a capital offence—which is highly unlikely. However, the Act does not provide for the creation of an independent investigation unit. This leaves victims with little recourse to the legal system as to where they may be sent or whether they are prosecuted (Zimmerman 9). The Law Reform and Reconciliation Commission does, however, provide for victims to be able to claim compensation (Gupta 8). In addition, victims can request an independent investigation unit to investigate and prosecute human trafficking.
In a landmark report on human trafficking, the British Human Rights Commission (CHR) concluded that the UK’s human-trafficking framework was “less intrusive and less restrictive in the use of force than in other jurisdictions”.
The Committee for the Protection of Animals’ report on the abuse of animals from factory farms in the UK states that “the UK has limited authority to conduct investigations because it is unable and unwilling to use the most sophisticated methods to determine the proper treatment of animals”. While the Committee for the Protection of Animals recommends that the Government consider whether there is sufficient public resources available to facilitate any investigation, the Committee does not specify which, or how the government would use such resources (Journer 6). The UK Government agrees that the laws prohibiting human trafficking in the UK should be changed.
Human trafficking has been a big problem in the last decade, and its impact on those victims of it is almost certainly already well documented. That human trafficking has been a big problem in the last decade has led to a national debate on how to tackle it. Most recently, the United Nations has recently announced that it wants to increase measures to criminalise human trafficking by providing legal services and ensuring that all people in the developing world are held accountable for their trafficking. The Human Rights Council, which has been advocating for action for a decade, has issued a report expressing their opposition to the proposals for improving legislation and guidelines governing how human trafficking is treated (Wolff 6). The UN report, “The Trafficking in Persons Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination in the Employment of Children”, is available here.
The Council urges the UK Government to consider whether and how it would make its current criminal and legal framework clear and how the UK is dealing with it. What this means for the UK, how its existing criminal and criminal laws are handling the issues of human trafficking, and how the criminal and prosecution laws and procedures with regard to human trafficking will make it clearer and more effective for UK human rights campaigners. The Human Rights Council also advises the UK Government not to introduce or revise criminal or punishment provisions that do not protect people in need from human trafficking; that no provision will make possible the establishment of a mechanism to punish people for serious or ongoing crimes of human trafficking
The human rights committee is committed to ensuring that human trafficking is seen to be the worst human trafficking crime that can be stopped with appropriate safeguards. This calls heavily for the UN, the Commission on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimination in the Employment of Children (CEDAW), the United Nations Human Rights Council and all organisations who represent human-trafficking victims across the globe to urgently and publicly demand that the UK Human Rights Council work together with all states and international human rights organizations to make laws and implement a criminal and criminal justice framework that addresses the
The third reason that vegetarianism is a prime choice, is for the environment. “There is a huge loss of protein resources going from grain to meat, and that some animals, especially cattle and Americans, use up piggish amounts of water, grains, and crop land” (Fraser 688). The meat industry contributes to a lot of problems like the degradation of land, climate change, pollution of the air and of the water, a shortage of water, and loss of biodiversity. It is concluded that the meat industry is a main contributor to some of the most serious environmental problems.
There are not many people who choose to be herbivores. Today, most people are carnivores or omnivores. There are many people who may argue with the reasons above on why one should not eat meat. One may say that meat has vitamins and nutrients that one needs to survive that are not attainable through pairing two incomplete proteins to try and make one whole complete protein. It may be argued that many people do not know how to properly plan their diets to get all the nutrients and vitamins that their