Mba 590Essay Preview: Mba 590Report this essayProblem Solution: Harrison-Keyes Inc.University of PhoenixMBA 590: Strategic Implementation and AlignmentDr. Jay DebIntroductionHarrison-Keyes is at a pivotal point in the companys history. It must decide what strategy will carry it into the future and mitigate the current circumstances that are pervasive in the industry.
BackgroundHarrison-Keyes was founded in 1899. It came to profitability by publishing well known authors. As time progressed, the company felt that it needed to shift its focus. In the 1950s H-K moved to business, scientific and technical information content. In addition it has spread into journals, professional and consumer books, textbooks and other educational materials. Within their library of content they have over 22,000 titles and add 2000 new titles every year.
Currently they are facing similar problems as other publishers. Big box retailers are dominating the market. This has caused independent retailers to struggle or fail. As a result distribution channels are consolidating and reducing profits. In addition, large retailers are offering a generous return policy which effecting profits further.
As a result of stagnate situation of the publishing industry; Harrison-Keyes has hired a new CEO Meg McGill. Based on industry review Mrs. McGill has developed an e-publishing strategy. Harrison-Keyes also believes this to be a sound strategy because rivals have also adopted it. Unfortunately, for H-K, they have been quick to implement their digital strategy.
In trying to implement their strategy H-K has faced some problems. William X. Harper, a best selling and Pulitzer Prize winning author has not accepted this as a viable strategy for his books. He is so intolerant of the strategy that he has spoken out in different venues. Inside sources have leaked to the media problems with foreign vendors, technology and implementation issues that are plaguing the launch of McGills strategic initiative. Further Wall Street analysts have placed a hold recommendation on H-K stock.
H-K is also facing technical problems with the development of the program. First the foreign program vendor, Asia Digital, is difficult to communicate with. This has caused unforeseen delays. Further H-K has realized unforeseen costs with the distribution of the digital material. Specifically, $ 250 thousand for hardware and $75 thousand in software upgrades.
Issues, Challenges and OpportunitiesH-K is facing some specific issues that will prevent it from being successful with their digital strategy. First, author retention is crucial for any publisher. The company must have content the consumer desires in order to stay profitable. Second, if H-K is able to retain their talented author, they must protect the copyrighted content to prevent piracy, maintain profitability, and royalties. Third, they must control the project costs. As with any new strategy it takes time for the audience to adopt. Therefore it is crucial to make the project profitable as early as possible. Fourth, H-K has a decreased market share. As a result they could be losing the prestige and power of a large organization.
The challenge with piracy is the not the elimination of such events, but to limit their ability to effect royalties and profits. Next, if H-K is not able to maintain their talented pool of authors, they will find it difficult to sell any new content. If the company wants to be a leader must continue to have the content that makes it a leader in their category. If this is not addressed it could affect the company as a whole. Another challenge will be to keep the costs of the project under control. If the project costs exceed the original projections significantly the payback period could exceed the useful life of the project.
By addressing the piracy issue effectively H-K could attract other authors thus increasing its content library. In addition, having great content would also help to increase market share and profitability. Another financial consideration is H-Ks ability to effectively work with Asia Digital to maximize current investments and deliver profits at the lowest cost possible.
Framing the ProblemH-K believes it needs to approach the problem in a manner that does not limit it to any particular publishing strategy. Therefore, based on the issues, challenges, and opportunities H-K has framed the problem in the following: Harrison Keyes will develop a publishing strategy to maximize market share by addressing the needs of its authors.
End Stated Goals:In terms of financials H-K should have increased market share. Further the strategy should increase profits over the print publishing strategy. H-K also wishes to gain the support of its authors. As a result it can attract more authors to increase its content.
Generic BenchmarkingOrganization BackgroundGerman Cologne Sports University is a pubic ally funded school that specializes in sports education. According to J. Bernstein (2006) GCU specializes in sports medicine, applied human movement, and natural sciences, to name a few. It has an enrollment of 7000 students. It offers undergraduate, post graduate and doctorate level research and education. It has also received recognition from the International Olympic Committee as an accredited laboratory for drug testing. (Bernstein, 2006)
IssueRecently GCU has faced a significant business challenge in protecting copy righted material while allowing access to interested parties, both inside the organization and outside. The specific challenge was to allow access for students, faculty and others to reproduce digital textbooks and multimedia products while protecting the information from competing organizations. Digitization was a viable strategy because it produced original work and did not have a long history of publication; therefore the university was open to then process. (Bernstein, 2006) GCU also wanted to tap a new stream of revenue by selling the information electronically while avoiding piracy. This was validated
The Future
Although the use of the online is expanding, the current approach does not solve the underlying problem of protecting the original work and the current model does not address the source for the content. Although the new generation of publishers has a number of innovative ideas and features, the core principles are not changing. While we are working on a new model to protect the source for the content, we continue to develop new technologies to make it possible for other publishing platforms to do the same. These are ongoing discussions and ongoing development in the field of copyright. We remain focused on expanding the capabilities of current technologies such as the new RIAA and CDMA and on developing better ways for independent publishers to protect their intellectual property and to retain those intellectual property.
1 The RIAA has a strong history of being an important regulator of intellectual property. In its 2010, New York Times editorial page, it asserted that “no person, the person who creates a system or institution, should be restricted by the law… To a certain extent, there should be no restriction of the use of copyright as the primary force for producing new works of art without first having obtained approval from the court.
The RIAA is also a powerful regulator and an important step in the development process if all of our customers are willing to submit the necessary licenses. Because of their close relationship and strong belief that the RIAA will be a great regulator, many of our customers are willing to take full ownership of the content stored on our property, and should also be able to comply with all applicable laws.
It is a challenge, not an option
One of the things that can make the transition to using digital copyright information is the need for the organization to develop technologies that would make it nearly impossible for one institution to access copyright material and its information can be shared with another. Even our legal obligations can’t provide it. While we’re still waiting for some form of the RIAA to be approved for use through the Internet Archive, it is clear that we haven’t yet considered a variety of options for how to obtain the files we need so we cannot ignore it entirely.[1]
The goal is to make an organization’s digital files as available for peer-to-peer sharing. However, as with the original source, it is possible that some organizations can find themselves without such an option in spite of the possibility and will find it difficult to resist. The new approach to protect content does not address the source, its limitations, and how it has affected the legal and administrative framework for both the publishing world and our content creation process. Thus, it still does not provide meaningful protection to content that makes people less likely to share it privately and at all costs.
References:
A. Hirsch, M. & G. Meekson,