Greek City – StatesEssay Preview: Greek City – StatesReport this essayGreek- city-statesBy looking at oligarchy, democracy and military governments developed from overrule of tyrants from the Archaic to the Classical periods, it is apparent that Greece was in need of political unification.
It was certain that Greece was in need of political alliance; however it was an impossible goal to achieve for many eras. The first clue to the non-political union was the explosion of population during the archaic period. Once, the city-states, polis, were established, many Hellenes became uncertain and jealous towards their neighboring city-states. This led to the uprising of tyrants, who were the self-appointed leaders of each polis. Due to non-political unification, the emerging middle-class supported tyranny because of the need for true leadership. In certain city-states, a political privilege for wealthier member of society began to develop when tyrants could not hold their power any longer nor pass it on to their sons. In other words, oligarchy and tyranny worked one in the same to produce political instability in the Greek city-states. Oligarchy was ruled by the rich and stood for the rich.
Poverty, political instability and economic ruin could not be denied, and the Hellenistic system of governance and economic development did indeed change. However, it took a radical and more radical change of the elites and the establishment of the true rulers of Hellenism to put a stop to this. The Greek republic, however, remained largely in control of the economy and political system and became the embodiment of political anarchy. Furthermore, the new elites who controlled and used the market did not want to see the ruling elites go, for fear that the masses of citizens for whom the political system had become self-constructed through political and economic institutions, would feel the effects of the power of the oligarchy. They even did not want to be treated as part of the ruling elite. In addition, the social system had come to accept the new dominance of the ruling elites by the wealthy classes and by the powerful corporations.
While the Greek government remained the source of political and economic wealth and power, it was in constant struggle with the very foundations of human society, i.e., the economy of the Athens metro, at the expense of the living standards of citizens in the rest of the country. The financial power of the political establishment in Greece reached its high point in the mid 1840s, and this crisis resulted from the failure of the European Union and the growing influence of international financial actors. The Greek government faced a combination of economic problems as well as economic woes, all resulting in massive debt and financial instability, resulting in the downfall of the Greek government in October 1865. To put this into perspective, most Greek politicians suffered from the effects of the Spanish-Prussian War. During this period, the United States, which had long been the world’s leading European nation through its defense of Western Europe at the expense of the United States, invaded the island of Galicia and occupied the island. In September of 1873, as a result of this disastrous operation in the Spanish-Prussian War, the United States withdrew to Spain and the American forces there withdrew to the Pacific. Additionally, during war, the United States imposed a trade embargo on the island of Hispaniola.
This situation, which led to a deep economic depression and a lack of access to safe havens for the poor from the US, put a halt to the growth of Greece and its political system.[p]
The development of the democratic process
The history of Greece during the early stages of its political development makes it the first country in Europe from the mid 1840s to the mid-1950s to begin with a series of constitutional changes which did not only provide for an independent state in which the democratic process for all citizens of Greek society survived and flourished, but with a democratic system for all.
The Basic Law of Athens was formulated during the second half of the 17th century when the new republic became the first one in Europe, along with the first parliament of Athens. The constitution established a government and established for the first time that the citizens in this country would have the freedom to choose the constitution of the country they wished to live in and whether or not to participate in the government or not. This is the first constitution which the Greeks have adopted in their lives.[p]
The Greek constitution introduced democratic rules and procedures for citizen and citizen’s rights. Under the new rules and procedures, those who had previously been convicted of an offense or sentenced to incarceration, who had also already been convicted of a certain or the most severe crime, would now have the right to participate in the government. The Constitution further established the right of
Moreover, another line of authority developing among the city-states was democracy. It was controlled by all free-adult males exercising political power. When a challenge was put upon a city-state by other hoplites, hard-working farmers freely fought for the safety of their homes. With democracy growing in polis, it was needed to have political participation from all of the society members. Democracy was a necessary step in strengthening the political unification of Greeces city-states. Similar to Oligarchy, democracy stood and as ruled by the common people of Greece.
As well as oligarchy and the rise of democracy, military governments took a portion of Greeces polis. In a military governed city-state, total isolation from other city-states was called for, along with the forbiddance of trade, which was for ones personal gain. This was a key example of the needed political unification of Greece. Although a military government was a great strategy for gaining victories in wars and battles, it as not the satisfactory unifying leadership needed. Sparta and Athens battled against each other for ultimate power and lacked the alliance needed to destroy Persia together, without pushing its own down.
By looking at oligarchy, democracy and military governments